Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Qualitative methods, due to their specific approach to social reality - which in turn leads to specific approach to the subjects of analysis - have the same proportion of adherents as opponents. Additional problem results from the interpretative paradigm that blurs the borders between particular theoretical conceptions, which consequently favors freedom of interpretation. This situation results in widespread criticism of qualitative analyses, voiced mostly by supporters of the positivist conception of science. As a result, social researchers tend to contrast these two methodologies, often disregarding qualitative analyses. Still, both types of analysis have their advantages and disadvantages. More importantly, proper understanding of qualitative analysis combined with quantitative approaches could help to create a complementary unit, which would provide a relatively comprehensive explanation of social phenomena and processes - both on an individual and collective level. Therefore, the aim of the paper is to indicate the aforementioned dangers and to show the specific nature of qualitative analyses as a new way of exploring different spheres of reality.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.