Results found: 2

Search results

Sort By:

Limit search:

Pozór malarstwa w poglądach estetycznych G.W.F. Hegla

100%

Drohomirecki A.

Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja

2015

vol. 8

issue 2

131-140

The author refers to the term "aesthetic appearance," which was shaped in the mid-eighteenth century, mainly in German philosophy and aesthetics. He stresses that its appearance coincided, not without reason, with aesthetics be coming an autonomous philosophical discipline. That was the foundation for the subsequent understanding of aesthetics as the sc ience about art. The author is particularly interested in the philosophical system of Georg WF Hegel, for whom learning about art plays a special role - it represents just one of the many forms of knowledge, also being the first - in terms of quality and history - form of the development of self-awareness, ie. be coming a spirit. Ambiguity of the con cept of aesthetic appearance results from the inability to separate it from the category of illusion, falsehood and truth, ideas, inscribed in the structure of each work of art. The art of painting does not escape this law. According to Hegel, implacable, phenomenal structure of painting is defined by the perceptual process itself. Paintings make us enter the current presence of daily life that is similar to our everyday lives, as well as they cut all the threads of needs and inclinations, likes and loathing and they show us these items in their specific fullness of life as goals for themselves. Painting, as a uniform pictographic visualization of subject and object proximity includes an immanent game providing knowledge and a kind of a semantic core.

Zabawy za lustrem

100%

Drohomirecki A.

DYSKURS: Pismo Naukowo-Artystyczne ASP we Wrocławiu

2012

vol. 13-14

122-135

In my article I undertake a problem of relations between art as mirror, play and work in aesthetic thought, than ancient tradition – which is represented by Plato – to contemporary thought, like Bauman’s sociology or Rancierè’s philosophy. I would like to show how “art as mirror” and “art as play” were contrasted which notion of work. A historical situation of art is not clear. Of course in ancient Greek thought an art was described by the techné and mimesis notion. But by the other way Plato was rejected poetry (as some kind of mimetic “art”) form polis, because loss of techné. The same different is appear in postmodern thought, like Rancierè or Bauman. For example Bauman show how “work” begins to looks likeness a “play”, people want to have they consequences/effects right now. When thought about “work” and “play” has changed, the same “work” and the “play” – as human activity – was in itself also changed. Question of aesthetic is following: in what place, between work and play, is now art? Article is also meant to be some kind of play with a reader. The point of play is to appear this subject in other, not academic way.

Refine search results

1 DYSKURS: Pismo Naukowo-Artystyczne ASP we Wrocławiu

1 Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja

2 Drohomirecki A.

1 2015

1 2012

Search results

Pozór malarstwa w poglądach estetycznych G.W.F. Hegla

Zabawy za lustrem