Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The revolutionary social and political changes initiated in the summer of 1980, related to the birth of and activities conducted by the Solidarity movement, took place mainly because of the social mobilization of workers. The direction and nature of these changes were also determined – albeit not necessarily in an active manner – by the attitude of other social structures, particularly the creative circles. Opole, the city regarded since 1963 in terms of an informal capital of the Polish song – is a good example. The 19th National Contest of the Polish Song, held from 25 until 28 June 1981, became a legend. The song “Let Poland be Poland”, performed to the general public at this festival, became an unofficial anthem of the Solidarity revolution. For political reasons, the festival organizers could not interfere in the course of the festival. The censorship intervention proved unsuccessful, as well. The activity of TSA, a rock group set up in Opole, was also a major phenomenon on a national scale. The group’s songs constituted a certain attempt at escaping from the greyness and hopelessness of everyday life in communist Poland. Somehow shadowed by these phenomena were local facts connected with individual attitudes of representatives of the Opole creative circles towards the revolutionary changes taking place in Poland’s social and political life. These facts, however, are also significant in the context of illustrating the social realities of the 1980s. A vast majority of artists from Opole was not actively engaged in the endeavours of the opposition forces, but – at the same time – they would neither attack the opposition nor side with the authorities. Cases of active involvement in the activities undertaken by one or the other side of the political barricade were quite rare. The longstanding opposition activity of the Opole actor Tadeusz Żyliński calls for special attention. This man is an example through which one can see quite clearly how much could be done by politically active artists after August 1980. Unfortunately, only a small part of the Opole creative circles was interested in such opportunities. Political passivity, coupled with efforts aimed at fulfilling one’s own personal and professional ambitions, were definitely more prevailing. Everyday social and political reality of the 1980s in Poland was a far cry from the idealistic views on the social mission of our intelligentsia.
XX
The materials created by the Security Service (SB, Służba Bezpieczeństwa) of the Ministry of Interior (MI) and other special services of the People’s Republic of Poland (PRL, Polska Rzeczpospolita Ludowa) are valuable, and often even irreplaceable sources that enable conducting research on the most recent history of Poland. However, they ought to be treated in a reasonable manner, with utmost caution, because they were created by the services that conspired their operational activity also within their own ranks. One ought to remember about the different specifics of the operational materials allocated for internal use by SB operational units, as well as other materials, such as for instance investigative files, personal files of internees, reporting materials, inter-department or external correspondence. This concerns especially the documentation concerning the human intelligence sources of the SB. The persons registered as SB human intelligence sources could be interrogated or searched by officers of the SB investigation division who were not fully familiar with the actual role of the individual. The documentation created on such occasions (interrogation or search protocols, etc.) simply could not contain information that the given individual performed the role of an agent. The same concerns court and prosecution files. Drawing unilateral conclusions only on the basis of such materials, without including relevant operational materials and record entries, could result in the erroneous belief that we are dealing solely with a victim of oppression. Incorrect conclusions can also be drawn if SB inter-department correspondence or routine correspondence with the MI is used unilaterally. Moreover, these materials could not contain information uncovering human intelligence sources. The same regards the files of those interned during martial law. Opposite situations might also take place – the contents of the preserved entries that confirm the registration of an individual as an SB human
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.