Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The EEA–ESEM congress was a major event in this year's economics conference season, organized in Budapest by the Central European University and the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in the last week of August. It was attended by some 1600 delegates, including 300 from Germany, 170 each from the United States and the UK, 140 from France, 110 from Spain, and 73 registered Hungarians. This account of a few sessions seeks to exemplify the tone of the conference and identify the subject areas at the centre of scientific attention today. No complete account can be given in this form, as up to 40 sections were at work at one time.
EN
Flat-tax schemes are being adopted by many Central and Eastern European countries as a way of boosting their economies and tax revenues. Though there are signs that some countries do manage to improve in both respects, it is hard in general to distinguish the behavioural response to tax changes from the effect of increased tax enforcement. This study addresses this gap by estimating the elasticity of taxable income in Hungary, one of the outliers in terms of not having a flat-tax scheme. The authors analyse taxpayer behaviour using a medium-scale tax reform episode in 2005, which changed marginal and average tax rates but kept enforcement constant. They employ a Tax and Financial Control Office (APEH) panel dataset for 2004-5, with roughly 215,000 taxpayers. The results suggest a relatively small but highly significant tax-price elasticity of about 0.06 for the population earning above the minimum wage (about 70 per cent of all taxpayers). This value increases to about 0.3 for the upper 20 per cent of the income distribution, with some income groups exhibiting even higher elasticities (0.45). Using these results, the authors have quantified the impact of a hypothetical flat income-tax scheme. The calculations indicate that although there is room for parallel improvement of budget revenues and after-tax income, the gains are modest (2.0 and 1.4 per cent, respectively). Moreover, such a reform entails important adverse changes in income inequality, with the burden falling mostly on lower-middle income taxpayers.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.