Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Z fonetyki Listów Swięteo Oyca Partheniusza (1643)

100%
Klimek J.
Acta Baltico-Slavica
|
2013
|
vol. 37
575-584
EN
This paper is devoted to a selection of issues concerning the phonetics of the 17thcentury Kievan variety of Polish, analyzed in the context of the 17thcentury standard Polish and its other regional varieties. Polish translations of the letters written by the Patriarch of Constantinople Parthenius I to the Kievan Metropolitan Piotr Mohyla were used as research material. The vocalic analysis covers the follo­wing aspects: the raised vowels, the reduction of oN into uN, the alternation between każdy and kożdy, as well as the nasal vowel articulation. The paper also discusses the following consonantal features: the distortion in the palatalization of consonants, the phonetic realization of -ou-, -au- in borrowings, the presence of the palatalized ch’ – and the problematic spelling of l – ł. No significant phonetic contrasts have been detected between Listy... [‘Letters...’] and other texts written in the Kievan variety of Polish. This allows a conclusion that the phonetics of the translated letters is representative of the Kievan Polish of the 1640s. This variety, on the other hand, exhibits the influence of the standard Polish as well as of Russian,
RU
Статья посвящена вопросам фонетики языка семнадцатого века Киева, рассматриваемого на фоне восточного варианта и общепольского языка. В качестве исходного материала взят польский перевод писем патриарха Константинополя Партения I митрополиту Киева, Петру Могиле. Анализ вокализма включает: суженные гласные, чередование każdy – kożdy и реализацию носовых гласных. Анализ консонантизма включает: нарушения мягкости согласных, судьбу -ou-, -au- в заимствованных формах, наличие мягкого -ch’-, ошибочные записи l – ł. Не обнаруживается больших различий между Письмами... и другими польскими текстами, напечатанными в XVII в. в Киеве, поэтому можно прийти к выводу, что фонетика перевода Писем... характерна для польского языка, употребляемого в то время в Киеве. В описываемом варианте языка можно найти следы воздействия как общепольского языка, так и восточнославянского субстрата.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Z fonetyki "Listów Święteo Oyca Partheniusza..." (1643)

100%
Klimek J.
Acta Baltico-Slavica
|
2013
|
vol. 37
EN
Selected remarks on the phonetics of Letters of Father Parthenius... (1643)This paper is devoted to a selection of issues concerning the phonetics of the 17th‑century Kievan variety of Polish, analyzed in the context of the 17th‑century standard Polish and its other regional varieties. Polish translations of the letters written by the Patriarch of Constantinople Parthenius I to the Kievan Metropolitan Piotr Mohyla were used as research material. The vocalic analysis covers the follo­wing aspects: the raised vowels, the reduction of oN into uN, the alternation between każdy and kożdy, as well as the nasal vowel articulation. The paper also discusses the following consonantal features: the distortion in the palatalization of consonants, the phonetic realization of -ou-, -au- in borrowings, the presence of the palatalized ‑ch’ – and the problematic spelling of l – ł. No significant phonetic contrasts have been detected between Letters... and other texts written in the Kievan variety of Polish. This allows a conclusion that the phonetics of the translated letters is representative of the Kievan Polish of the 1640s. This variety, on the other hand, exhibits the influence of the standard Polish as well as of Russian. Фонетика текста Listy Swieteo Oyca Partheniusza... (1643)Статья посвящена вопросам фонетики языка семнадцатого века Киева, рассматриваемого на фоне восточного варианта и общепольского языка. В качестве исходного материала взят польский перевод писем патриарха Константинополя Партения I митрополиту Киева, Петру Могиле. Анализ вокализма включает: суженные гласные, чередование każdy – kożdy и реализацию носовых гласных. Анализ консонантизма включает: нарушения мягкости согласных, судьбу -ou-, -au- в заимствованных формах, наличие мягкого -ch’-, ошибочные записи l – ł. Не обнаруживается больших различий между Письмами... и другими польскими текстами, напечатанными в XVII в. в Киеве, поэтому можно прийти к выводу, что фонетика перевода Писем... характерна для польского языка, употребляемого в то время в Киеве. В описываемом варианте языка можно найти следы воздействия как общепольского языка, так и восточнославянского субстрата.
3

Konstrukcja accusativus cum infinitivo w XVII-wiecznych polonikach kijowskich

100%
Klimek J.
Poznańskie Spotkania Językoznawcze
|
2010
|
vol. 21
61-74
EN
The article discusses the constructions of the type accusativus cum infinitivo in 12 Polish writings from Kiev from the years 1633-1691 and constitutes an attempt at placing the Polish language of those writings on the linguistic map of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. In source texts there dominates the so-called a.c.i. proper being a continuation of its Latin original whose structure was: verbum dicendi/sentiendi/declarandi + infinitivus + direct complement. In this group of examples special attention shall be paid to relatively numerous notations with a different infinitive than być (“be”). The so-called Polish a.c.i., which incorporates the infinitive być in the structure of nominal predicate, has fewer occurrences in the studied material, which is surprising in the light of data from Polish lands in the 17th century. Juxtaposition of the results of study with chronologically corresponding data from the northern territories of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth demonstrates different linguistic tendencies and becomes another reason for posing the question about the status of the Polish language of the Kievan printed material.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Język inskrypcji nagrobnych kilkunastu cerkiewnych cmentarzy powiatu tomaszowskiego

63%
Klimek J., Koper M.
Facta Simonidis
|
2010
|
vol. 3
|
issue 1
243-263
EN
This paper presents a linguistic analysis of sepulchral inscriptions in a number of Orthodox cemeteries in the district of Tomaszów Lubelski. The inscriptions under analysis date back to mid-19th and early 20th century – in the region there are no Orthodox graves from an earlier period. The linguistic analysis of the inscriptions is preceded by a brief survey of the history of the region. A detailed analysis of the inscriptions helped establish their main components: name, surname and the date of death. Additionally, the inscriptions include initial and concluding forms that make the obligatory element precise. Two tendencies occur in the inscriptions’ orthography. On the one hand, Church Slavonic influences are evident; on the other, Ruthenian elements are inserted. A similar variation is observable on the lexical level: Ukrainian (the territory of the former Austrian Partition) or Russian (the territory of the former Russian Partition – Congress Kingdom of Poland) forms are employed.
PL
W artykule przedstawiono analizę językową inskrypcji nagrobnych z kilkunastu cerkiewnych cmentarzy, które współcześnie pod względem administracyjnym należą do powiatu Tomaszów Lubelski. W zdecydowanej większości badane napisy pochodzą z drugiej połowy XIX i początku XX wieku. Analizę stricte lingwistyczną greckokatolickich i prawosławnych inskrypcji nagrobnych poprzedza rys historyczny tego obszaru. Szczegółowa charakterystyka materiału inskrypcyjnego pozwoliła na wyodrębnienie podstawowych elementów tablic nagrobnych – imienia, nazwiska i roku śmierci osoby zmarłej. Dodatkowo pojawiają się formuły inicjalne i finalne, które doprecyzowują wymienione elementy obligatoryjne. W zakresie ortografii zauważono dwie tendencje. Z jednej strony jest to uleganie wpływom cerkiewnym, z drugiej zaś wprowadzanie cech ruskich. Podobną wariantywność zaobserwowano również na poziomie leksykalnym. Przejawia się ona stosowaniem form ukraińskich (obszar dawnego zaboru austriackiego – Galicja Wschodnia) bądź rosyjskich (tereny należące do byłego zaboru rosyjskiego – Królestwo Polskie).
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.