Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Polityka „non-decision” u Platona

100%
EN
The aim of presented paper is an explanation of historical-systematic problem of „non-decision” by P. Bachrach&M.S. Baratz as silence sanctioned in linear (democratic) political practice. There are examples of this pattern in modern times as „taboo”, „political corectness” and „state secret”, in times of Plato there is the concept of „aporrheta” (secret), who developed the theory of it as elements of synchronic (totalitarian) discourse.
PL
Celem artykułu jest wyjaśnienie historyczno-systematycznego problemu „non-decision” u Bachracha, P. i Baratza, M.S. jako usankcjonowanego w praktyce politycznej linearnego (demokratycznego) milczenia. Przykładami takiego milczenia w czasach nowszych jest „tabu”, „poprawność polityczna” i „tajemnica państwowa”, w czasach Platona – pojęcie „aporrheta” (sekret, tajemnica) u Platona, który przedstawia je jednak jako element synchronicznego (totalitarnego) dyskursu.
2
100%
EN
The paper aims to defend classical numerical monism against thesis about predicative monism (Barnes, Curd). The instrumentarium is rich in philological-philosophical argumentation. The main line is the thesis of Mourelatos about Greek words on genos, genes suffixes and the argumentation of C.H. Kahn from The thesis on Parmenides. Argumentation is also against localistic interpretation of sphericity of Being in Parmenides.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.