Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Poczucie jakości życia osób długowiecznych

100%
Frąckowiak T.
Psychologia Rozwojowa
|
2012
|
vol. 17
|
issue 1
101-115
EN
The changing demography and the progress in medicine, pharmacy, undertaking preventive actions, allow a wider group of people reach the age of aging, and even a longevity. Unparalleled in the human history number of people will reach and exceed the ninetieth and hundredth year of life. Therefore the main aim of this study was to determine the level of the sense of the quality of life for generations of 90+ and comparing it with the sense of the quality of life for people in earlier stages of aging (75–89, 60–74). The sense of the quality of life was defined as a multidimensional occurence, including four main spheres of man’s functioning: psychophisical, psychosocial, subjective and metaphisical (spiritual).
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

RECENZJA

63%
Frąckowiak T.
Psychologia Rozwojowa
|
2010
|
vol. 15
|
issue 4
PL
Robert D. Hill (2010), Pozytywne starzenie się,Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Laurum, 312 s.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

REGISTERED REPORTS AS A METHOD TO INCREASE CREDIBILITY OF SCIENCE – EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AMONG PSYCHOLOGICAL STUDENTS

45%
Sorokowski P., Groyecka A., Błaszczyński K., Frąckowiak T., Kobylarek A.
Journal of Education Culture and Society
|
2019
|
vol. 10
|
issue 2
67-75
EN
Aims: The modern scientific publishing system suffers from many problems, amongst which one of the most important  is the pressure to publish positive results. A potentially simple way to mitigate publication bias are reviews of manuscript, prior to the data collection and analyses, as well as results presentation and discussion (i.e. Registered Reports). Methods: To test this prediction we conducted a quasi-experiment: two groups of students (n=38), as a part of their academic classes, were asked to design and conduct research projects. They were divided in two groups – Registered Reports- and control group. In both groups students have been encouraged to publish their papers in a local scientific journal. Results: Analyses revealed significant differences in p levels between groups, suggesting more reliable scores for Registered Reports group. Conclusions: Our study partially confirmed the  stated hypothesis and suggested, that registered reports might mitigate publication bias. Future recommendations are advised.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.