Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 39

first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last
EN
The new national security vision of Poland came after political transformation in Poland in 1989, the liquidation of the Warsaw Pact and aspirations to join the Western security and political system. After joining the NATO (1999), admission to the European Union (2004), has been fully integrated with the structures of these institutions. This placed the new challenges by identifying key priorities in its national security. New quality in the global and national security occurred on 11 September 2001, since when it has directly threatened the security of the United States. Under the influence of the country were changed the strategy of global security, followed by the national security of many countries, including the Polish market. In it, there was also the threat of international terrorism and declaration – also actively involved – to participate in its combat missions. A particularly important tool for the implementation of national security strategy, in addition to international guarantees and block and properly conducted foreign policy, is to have adequate national military capabilities including appropriate to the threats of the armed forces. The management of Polish political and military formally recognizes that premise – this has been reflected in the developed "Vision – 2030 Armed Forces."
EN
From the review of the interest in historiography of military aspects of the Polish-Russian war of 1919-1920, mainly Polish and Russian one, it seems that it went through various phases: from a huge interest to the time of clear stillness and another explosion during the last two decades. It was conditioned by political factors. During the interwar period at the Polish side, they tried to prove above all a genius of Józef Piłsudski in leading to the Polish victory in this war. Opposite opinions were marginalized and that is why they were little known. Among the Russians, there was an explosion of diaries and memoirs written by the most important leaders of the war. They tried to make their failures smaller explaining them with a conspiracy of imperialistic states and their military help given to Poland. In 1945-1989 in Poland, it was a taboo. The opposite side presented an imperialistic character of the war caused by the Polish bourgeoisie. There however appeared basic sources on military actions, published of course under tsar's supervision. After political changes, the Polish historiography experienced a huge increase of various publications (printed sources, compact studies of a monograph character but also chosen operations, battles and episodes from the war) and also many fragmentary papers published as articles (scientific, popular scientific, journalistic ones).
PL
Recenzja książki: Magdalena Molendowska, Paweł Górecki, Piotr Zalewski, Martyna Ostrowska, Logika bezpieczeństwa. Wybrane zagadnienia, Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, Toruń 2022, ss. 216
RU
Российская «историческая политика» - это попытка инструментальной трактовки истории с целью формирования нового образа русского патриотизма после распада СССР. Его иниции-ровал Горбачев, новое содержание ему придал Ельцин, а особую форму использовал Путин. Последний из них использовал историю для текущей политики. Впрочем, к исторической правде это имеет мало отношения, но это не главное в его «исторической политике». Однако имеет значение возможность размещения её в ведущейся «информационной войне», а это, в свою очередь, направлено на наращивание имперских позиций современной России, в том числе с применением вооруженных сил. Понимаемая таким образом «историческая политика» служила формированию сильного русского национализма.
EN
The Russian “remembrance policy” is an approach to instrumental treating history for creating new image of Russian patriotism after the collapse of the USSR. It has been initiated by Gorbachev, supplemented by Yeltsin, and specified by Putin. The latter has used history for actual politics. It has little to do with the historical truth but that is not important in his “remembrance policy”. Significant is a possibility of placing its elements the “information warfare” that aims to enhance the imperial position of contemporary Russia, also by using military force. A “remembrance policy” understood in this way has served for building strong Russian nationalism.
first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.