Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Skutki przekroczenia granicy sąsiedniego gruntu przy wznoszeniu budynku lub innego urządzenia (relacja między art. 151 a art. 231 k.c.)

100%
Górecki W.
Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego
|
2011
|
vol. 20
|
issue 2
391-443
EN
Determining the relations between the articles 151 and 231 of the Civil Code raises some doubts according to civil law and based on doctrine and judicial decisions. This problem gains special importance particularly when a person, who is the owner of one property, has had a building constructed partly on his/her own property and partly on the property he/she is not the owner of. The analysis of the above-mentioned situation has been performed in the current literature in three possible ways. The assumptions of the firs perspective (Position No.1 ) are based on the observation that, despite considerable similarities, articles 151 and 231 of the Civil Code, are not in the concurrence, as each of them relates to a different situation. The provision of the article 151 of the Civil Code may be only applicable in the event of a minor attachment of someone else's property. On the other hand, the analysis of a case where a building has been constructed on a larger area of someone else's property can be only performed pursuant to the article 231 of the Civil Code. Advocates of the next two approaches, with respect of the above-mentioned situation, allow the possibility of merging the scope of hypotheses provided in the Articles 151 and 231 of the Civil Code. The consequences of the concurrence of the provisions are not perceived uniformly. According to one of the perspectives (Position No. 2) it is affirmed that the application of the art. 231, paragraph 1 of the Civil Code does not definitely exclude the application of the art. 151 of the Civil Code and attention is paid to the fact that due to lack of grounds for the application of art. 231, paragraph 1 of the Civil Code, the owner of a neighboring property is entitled to exercise his/her powers specified in art. 151 of the Civil Law. The essence of another approach (Position No. 3) consists in the fact that the art. 231, paragraph 1 of the Civil Code excludes the application of the provisions of the art. 151 of the Civil Code. In the event that there are no grounds for the application of the art. 231, paragraph 1 of the Civil Code, the provisions of the art. 151 sentence 1 of the Civil Code can be applied. In addition to this, it is emphasized, within this approach, that in a situation described above, the owner of a neighboring property can support his/her claim by one of the powers specified in the art. 151, sentence 1 of the Civil Code and art. 231, paragraph 2 of the Civil Code. The author of the article gives his critical opinion of the Position No. 1 and No. 2. According to the opinion, the analysis of the situation related to a partial development of someone else's property ought to be performed in principle, based on the Position No. 3. The author of the article presents and looks into detailed effects arising out of accepting such an approach. He modifies it to some extent. The modification of the approach is that apart from art. 151 of the Civil Code, the provisions of the art. 231, paragraph 1 can be only applied. There are no grounds, however, for the application of the art. 231, paragraph 2 of the Civil Code.
2

Konsekwencje dokonania przez jednego z małżonków czynności prawnej w sferze prawnej drugiego małżonka

100%
Górecki W.
Rejent
|
2021
|
issue 8 (364)
27-49
EN
In this article, we can find a view criticism, according to art. 36 § 2 sentence 1 of the Family and Guardianship Code the contents of which serve to indicate that statutory mutual statutory representation of the spouses to make the activity of managing the assets of the spouses. In the author’s opinion a role of this provision is different. From art. 36 § 2 sentence 1 of the Family and Guardianship Code the authorization of each spouse results remaining in a joint marital property regime to exercise independently joint subjective rights towards third parties, i.e. the marital property subjective rights, including entitlement to disposal of these rights. In case of the legal acts obliging one of spouses to enter into financial commitment does not mean that another spouse is his/her party. In case of acquiring a property right by one of the spouses, its covering with the joint property of the spouses is a consequence of obliging art. 31 § 1 sentence 1 of the Family and Guardianship Code, and also art. 33 point 2 in fine of the Family and Guardianship Code.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Modern neurooncology – the development of the field and the possibilities of glioma therapy in Warsaw – a neurosurgical perspective

45%
Ząbek M., Warzecha A., Wójcikiewicz T., Górecki W., Czapski B.
MAZOWSZE Studia Regionalne
|
2019
|
issue 30
135-141
EN
This article is devoted to discussing the possibility of treating malignant brain tumors in the Mazovia region. The difficult clinical problem confronted by doctors and scientists is discussed in relation to the complex nature of gliomas. The current state-of-the-art treatment along with its limitations is subjected to discussion. The opportunities available to Mazovian doctors, which can be used to significantly prolong and improve the quality of patients’ lives, are presented in detail. Finally, the paper presents the wide range of possibilities for scientific cooperation and the directions it should take in order to learn more about the genesis of brain cancer and make it curable.
PL
Artykuł ten poświęcony jest omówieniu możliwości leczenia złośliwych nowotworów mózgu w województwie mazowieckim. Omawiany jest złożony problem kliniczny, dotyczący skomplikowanej natury guzów glejopochodnych. Obecny schemat leczenia jest poddawany pod dyskusję wraz z jego ograniczeniami. Przedstawiane są możliwości, z których mogą korzystać lekarze mazowieckich szpitali, mające istotny wpływ na zwiększenie jakości, jak i przedłużenia życia pacjentów. Na zakończenie przedstawione są szerokie możliwości współpracy naukowej oraz jej kierunki mające na celu poznanie genezy nowotworów mózgu, aby w przyszłości uczynić je uleczalnymi.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.