Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 8

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wacław Komarnicki o Konstytucji marcowej

100%
Mohyluk M.
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
|
2015
|
vol. 14
|
issue 2
143-163
EN
Wacław Komarnicki (1891–1954) was an outstanding Polish lawyer and academic. He was a constitutionalist and served in government in the II and III terms of the Second Polish Republic (1918–1939). Educated in Lyviv and at Dopat, Komarnicki taught law at the University of Stefan Batory in Vilnius, where he became a professor, and at the School of Political Science in Warsaw. He was also a member of the Polish Academy of Sciences, a political activist and Minister of Justice in the Polish Government in Exile in London, where he later died. His academic research and personal contribution in rela- tion to the March Constitution of 1921 and its amendment in August 1926, is deserving of particular attention.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Leopold Caro o ustawodawstwie radzieckim

100%
Mohyluk M.
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
|
2007
|
vol. 5
95-104
EN
Leopold Caro was an outstanding Polish lawyer, working on Uniwersytet Jana Kazimierza in Lvov in the pre-war period. He was analyzing both penal and civil branches of Soviet law in their early period of development. He was very critical about contents of Soviet codes of 1922. His works on Soviet law are original. He can be regarded as one of the pioneers in the research on Soviet law in Poland.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Rola „Wileńskiego Przeglądu Prawniczego” w rozwoju myśli sowietologicznej II Rzeczypospolitej – zarys problemów

100%
Mohyluk M.
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
|
2017
|
vol. 16
|
issue 1
141-152
EN
On 23rd February 1930 in Wilno (Vilnius), an inaugurational meeting of members of the East Europe Scientific-Research Institute took place. This Institute played the most im- portant role in Polish Sovietology research prior to World War II. The Institute annually published “Rocznik Instytutu Naukowo-Badawczego Europy Wschodniej w Wilnie”. In addition, legal issues were published in “Wileński Przegląd Prawniczy”. This mon- thly journal was first published on 1st February 1930 and was dedicated to Wilno la- wyers. The role of this journal in Polish and world legal Sovietology is underestimated and requires deep research.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Szymon Rundstein o prawie radzieckim

100%
Mohyluk M.
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
|
2008
|
vol. 6
67-77
EN
Before World War II Polish lawyers were very much interested in the changes taking place in Soviet law. They were making comparative studies, both from the theoretical and practical perspectives. Szymon Rundstein played important role in this research. He was outstanding lawyer, specialist in the international public law. He was taking part in preparing conventions in the League of Nations and also he was a judge in the international arbitration in Hague. He is recognized as a representative of Kelsen’s normativism. He was analyzing the political system and law of the totalitarian states, including Soviet Union.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Arkadiusz Bereza, Lublin jako ośrodek sądownictwa, lublin 2006, 140 stron.

100%
Mohyluk M.
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
|
2008
|
vol. 6
206-207
PL
Arkadiusz Bereza, Lublin jako ośrodek sądownictwa, lublin 2006, 140 stron.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wacław Makowski o radzieckim prawie karnym

100%
Mohyluk M.
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
|
2009
|
vol. 7
85-94
EN
Wacław Makowski (1880–1942) was an outstanding Polish politician, lawyer and scientist. He was one of the authors of the 1932 criminal code and of Polish constitution of 1935 (so called April Constitution). His scientific interests included also Soviet penal law. He wrote the preface to Soviet Penal Code of 1927 (Kodeks karny Rosji Sowieckiej 1927, Warszawa 1928). His critical remarks on Soviet penal law, although not very spacious, are important, because he questioned common opinion in the scientific Western world about this law. He criticized opinion that Soviet penal law was based on views of the Italian school of positive law. He started the discussion on Soviet penal law in Polish jurisprudence. This discussion seemed to be very interesting, but it was interrupted by the outbreak of World War II.
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Teoria prawa radzieckiego w poglądach wybranych prawników II Rzeczypospolitej

100%
Mohyluk M.
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
|
2010
|
vol. 9
67-81
EN
Polish lawyers in the period of Second Republic (1918–1939) were interested in changes of Soviet law, its theoretical grounds and practice. They were trying to analyze the Soviet law on comparative basis. From the beginning of 1920 the big stream of individual and group (organized) research has started. Such outstanding Polish lawyers as: Leopold Caro, Ignacy Czuma, Konstanty Grzybowski, Szymon Rundstein and Wiktor Sukiennicki can be regarded as pioneers in research on this field. Each of them represented his own method of research, due to differences in legal education, scientific interests or in philosophy of life. However, their conclusions were similar with those coming from modern sovietologists.
8
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

O sędziach pokoju w pracach Komisji Kodyfikacyjnej II RP

100%
Mohyluk M.
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
|
2021
|
vol. 20
|
issue 1
253-280
EN
The article presents work on the unification of the Polish judiciary in the Second Republic in the years 1918-1928. It was carried out in three tracks.  The initiator of the first moves consisting in unification of district regulations, reorganisation and taking over the judiciary was the government and the Ministry of Justice. Since February 1919, these measures were supported and approved by the Legislative Sejm (later the Sejm). Since November 1919 the burden of work was taken over by the Codification Commission of the Republic of Poland. The aim of this article is to discuss the course of work on the law on the system of common courts within the Codification Committee of the Republic of Poland, with particular emphasis on the provisions on justices of the peace. From this point of view, it will help to solve the main research problem of the article: to what extent did the Polish Codification Commission contribute to shaping the institution of justices of the peace in the Ordinance of the President of the Republic of Poland on Law on the System of Judiciary of 6 February 1928. The article makes use of archival materials, protocols from the sessions of the Codification Commission of the Second Polish Republic, the legal literature of the Second Republic and the current literature on the subject.
PL
W artykule przedstawiono prace nad unifikacją sądownictwa polskiego w II Rzeczypospolitej w  latach  1918-1928.  Prowadzone były one trzytorowo.  Inicjatorem pierwszych posunięć polegających na ujednolicaniu przepisów dzielnicowych,  reorganizowaniu i przejmowaniu sądownictwa był rząd i Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości. Od lutego 1919 r. działania te wspierał i zatwierdzał Sejm Ustawodawczy (później Sejm). Od listopada 1919 r. ciężar prac przejęła Komisja Kodyfikacyjna RP. Celem niniejszego artykułu ma być omówienie przebiegu prac nad prawem o ustroju sądów powszechnych w łonie Komisji Kodyfikacyjnej RP ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem przepisów dotyczących sędziów pokoju. Z tego punktu widzenia, pozwoli to na rozstrzygnięcie głównego problemu badawczego artykułu: w jakim stopniu Komisja Kodyfikacyjna RP przyczyniła się do ukształtowania instytucji sędziów pokoju zawartego w rozporządzeniu Prezydenta RP Prawo o ustroju sądownictwa z 6 lutego 1928 r. W artykule wykorzystano materiały archiwalne, protokoły z obrad Komisji Kodyfikacyjnej II RP, piśmiennictwo prawnicze II Rzeczypospolitej oraz aktualną literaturę przedmiotu.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.