Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
This article is the semotic and cultural analysis of Patriarch Kirill’s speeches at conferencesand meetings of the World Russian National Council. Such speeches arenot only a part of the policy of the Russian Orthodox Church - which remains ina particular relationship with the official policy of the Russian state, but - makingan appeal to the Russian cultural identity - also aspire to be the synthetic approach,to show most important things for the Church. In doing so, they must refer to thoseparts of the Russian semiotic universe that are most recognizable to users of culture- as a sign of “selfdescription”. The recipient of a message, by “finding himself” inthis construct of identity, also can better understand the ideological level of message.Therefore, ideological constructs tend to have unusually abundant cultural background.This article focus on the background of those ideological constructs, whichare very current topic in the official discourse of the Russian Orthodox Church inrecent years - such as “The Russian Civilization” and “The Russian World”.
PL
KULTURA „JEDEN” W KULTURZE „DWA”W KWESTII OPISU ISTOTY RADZIECKIEJ KULTURY OFICJALNEJ Streszczenie Autor artykułu wskazuje, iż w określonych sytuacjach ofi cjalna kultura radziecka modelu „dwa” (a zatem, według klasyfi kacji Władimira Papiernego, statyczna kultura totalitarna o wektorze dośrodkowym) wykorzystuje znaki, emblematy i wątki, wypracowane przez kulturę „jeden” (rewolucyjną, dynamiczną, o wektorze odśrodkowym). Następuje to przede wszystkim wówczas, gdy w obrębie kultury „dwa” dokonuje się kompleksowe konstruowanie świadomości mitologicznej jej uczestników. Kultura „jeden” oferuje kulturze „dwa” gotowe schematy kosmogoniczne. CULTURE ‘ONE’ IN CULTURE ‘TWO’FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT THE NATURE OF SOVIET OFFICIAL CULTURE Summary The author points out in the article that in certain situations the offi cial Soviet culture, so-called model ‘two’ (i.e. according to Vladimir Paperny’s classifi cation, the static totalitarian culture, driven by centripetal forces) uses the symbols, emblems and ideas developed by culture ‘one’ (revolutionary, dynamic and driven by centrifugal forces). This takes place fi rst 
Studia Religiologica
|
2012
|
vol. 45
|
issue 4
323–326
PL
Historia kulturowa – schyłek czy nowa odsłona? [Recenzja książki: Peter Burke, Historia kulturowa
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.