Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Presumptions on Discretion in Law Enforcement of Financial Legal Provisions

100%
Barikova A.
Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie
|
2021
|
vol. 2(30)
7-24
EN
The author has outlined the essence of legal presumptions on discretion in law enforcement of financial legal provisions as both current legal phenomena and legal regulations. The relationship between presumptions and principles of law, as well as the classification of presumptions has been researched into. Presumptions on discretion in law enforcement of financial legal provisions are formed in relation to a particular legal fact or group of facts or compositions that correspond with a particular law enforcement situation, which is due to the origin, content and purpose of these facts or compositions, the relationship between them. With regard to discretion in law enforcement of financial legal provisions, it could also be argued that there are both legally defined irrefutable presumptions (innocence, “all doubts in favour of the taxpayer”) and rebuttable in a particular case, which does not terminate its effect as a whole. It has been concluded that presumptions on discretion in law enforcement of financial legal provisions are applied due to logical methods of induction or modelling, when the probability of a phenomenon is not high enough.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Penal (financial) sanctions for non-payment of agreed amounts of tax obligations

100%
Barikova A.
Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne
|
2023
|
vol. 21
|
issue 1
51-62
PL
O celowości badań stosowania sankcji karnych (finansowych) za niepłacenie uzgodnionych kwot zobowiązań podatkowych przesądzają wieloaspektowe i kontrowersyjne relacje, jakie powstają w zakresie poboru podatków i opłat, kompetencji organów kontrolnych, uprawnień i obowiązków ich funkcjonariuszy, odpowiedzialności za naruszenia przepisów podatkowych. Celem artykułu jest ujawnienie cech stosowania sankcji karnych (finansowych) za niepłacenie uzgodnionych kwot zobowiązań podatkowych. Zastosowano współczesne metody ogólnofilozoficzne, ogólnonaukowe i szczegółowe. Omówiono procedurę pociągnięcia płatnika do odpowiedzialności finansowej oraz model fintech przy nakładaniu kar. Wskazano, że datą, od której liczy się termin, w którym można nałożyć karę pieniężną, jest data zapłaty umówionej kwoty zobowiązania podatkowego, a nie data, w której upływa ustawowy termin zapłaty umówionej kary pieniężnej. Przeanalizowano szczególne problemy pojawiające się w związku z datą, od której liczony jest ten termin, a związane z przeprowadzaną przez organ podatkowy kontrolą w zakresie terminowości zapłaty umówionego zobowiązania podatkowego (pieniężnego) oraz stosowania kar za zwłokę podatnika uzgodnionego zobowiązania pieniężnego. Praktyczna wartość uzyskanych wyników polega na tym, że mogą one posłużyć do ustalenia określonych limitów czasowych do obliczenia okresu, w którym można by przeprowadzić izbową kontrolę terminowości regulowania uzgodnionych zobowiązań pieniężnych.
EN
The relevance of the research of applying penal (financial) sanctions for non-payment of agreed amounts of tax obligations has been determined by multifaceted and controversial relations that arise regarding tax and fee collection, competence of controlling bodies, powers and duties of their officials, responsibility for violations of tax legislation. The purpose of the article is to reveal the features of applying penal (financial) sanctions for non-payment of agreed amounts of tax obligations. Contemporary general philosophical, general scientific and specific scientific methods have been used. The procedure for bringing the payer to financial responsibility and fintech model when applying fines have been addressed. It has been adduced that the date from which the period during which a fine could be imposed is calculated is the date of payment of the agreed amount of the tax liability, and not the date on which the statutory payment period for the agreed monetary liability expires. Specificity of the date from which this period is calculated, has been dealt with in terms of the tax authority conducting a chamber audit on the timeliness of payment of the agreed tax (monetary) obligation, and the application of fines for late payment by the taxpayer of the agreed monetary liability is the date of actual payment of the agreed amount of the tax liability. The practical value of the results is that they could be used to establish specific temporal limits for calculating the period during which a chamber check could be conducted on the timeliness for paying the agreed monetary obligations.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.