Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The purpose of this study was to examine the connection between two different implicit measures of attitudes towards others. In base on previous studies on prejudices and national stereotypes, also with use of these techniques, Jews were chosen as target group. Two techniques were used. The first of them was the graphic, questionnaire technique to assess asymmetry in the self-other distance rating. Stereotypical perception of Jews was indicated by Judocentric asymmetry effect, which was reversed in relation to typical egocentric asymmetry effect. The second technique was Polish version of the Implicit Association Test (IAT), a method using reaction time as an indicator of automatic processes, which is widely applied to measure implicit attitudes. The stronger IAT effect the more stereotypic perception of Jews. Forty-seven psychology students participated in described study. The obtained results indicate that there is a significant correlation between these two techniques: the higher Judocentric asymmetry effect the stronger IAT effect.
EN
There are many theoretical reviews and empirical investigations about the identity determinants of stereotyping. The majority of them are connected with the classic understanding of a stereotype as a mental representation of a typical member of an out-group. The purpose of this current research was to investigate the relation between identity and readiness for conspiracy stereotyping. Two studies were conducted. The results obtained suggest that both personal and social identity might influence the subject's readiness for conspiracy stereotyping. The higher the level of personal identity formation (when SELF schemata is distinct form WE schemata) the weaker tendencies for conspiracy stereotypisation, whereas the higher the level of social identity formation (when WE schemata is distinct form OTHERS schemata) the stronger the readiness for conspiracy stereotyping. It was also observed that the categorical form of social identity is more conductive for conspiracy stereotyping than the attributional form of social identity.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.