Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 16

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Czy finansista jest człowiekiem (moralnym)?

100%
Filek J.
Prakseologia
|
2010
|
issue 150
71-86
EN
The title of the article could suggest the author’s assumption that a fi nancier is a human being, and the essence of the question pertains solely to whether he / she is a moral being or not. Actually, however, the text is also an attempt to answer a much more iconoclastic question: Can a model financier be considered a human being with the use of ideas and characteristics of philosophical anthropology? While taking trouble to answer both questions, the author comes to a conclusion that from a perspective of anthropological concepts it is quite difficult to regard a model homo pecuniosus as homo sapiens. Moreover, certain concepts of ethics question considering homo pecuniosus as moral human being. The main reasons of those doubts include essential features of a model homo pecuniosus, such as: uncontrollable inclination to counting, unlimited greed to possess, strong desire of power, a radical technocratic rationalism attitude, uttermost individualism, incapability of emotions, lack of sense of community feeling, moral indifferentism, and excessive inclination to risk.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wolność i odpowiedzialność w świecie wielkich korporacji. Rozważania wokół pytania: czy wierzymy jeszcze w wolny rynek?

100%
Filek J.
Prakseologia
|
2015
|
vol. 157/2
137-161
PL
Bezpośrednią inspiracją do napisania tego tekstu było pytanie zadane uczestnikom międzynarodowej konferencji zorganizowanej przez EBEN Polska w 2014 r., a brzmiące: Czy wierzymy jeszcze w wolny rynek? Refleksja nad pytaniem o aktualną wolność rynku doprowadziła autorkę do ponownego przeanalizowania charakteru wolności ekonomicznej, szczególnie w porównaniu z jej rozumieniem filozoficznym. Wynik tej analizy w skrócie można oddać w postaci tezy: oderwanie rozumienia wolności ekonomicznej od jej filozoficznych źródeł oraz nadużywanie tej idei w przestrzeni gospodarczej za pomocą indywidualizmu ekonomicznego doprowadziło do paradoksalnej sytuacji, w ramach której rynek staje się – głównie w wydaniu korporacyjnym – coraz mniej wolny, a rozwój gospodarki oparty na wzroście siły korporacyjnej zagraża wolności człowieka zarówno jako pracownika, klienta, jak i obywatela.
EN
A direct inspiration to write this text was a question asked to participants of the International Conference organized by EBEN Poland in 2014: do we still believe in the free market? Reflection on the question of the current market freedom has made the author re-examine the nature of economic freedom, particularly compared with its philosophical understanding. The result of this analysis could be shortly presented in the form of a following thesis: separation of economic freedom understanding from its philosophical roots, and over-use of this idea in the economic space by means of economic individualism, has led to a paradoxical situation in which the market becomes – mainly in the corporate environment – less and less free, while development of economy based on the growth of corporate power threatens the freedom of man as an employee, customer and citizen alike.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Rozważania wokół nierówności

100%
Filek J.
Prakseologia
|
2014
|
issue 156
283-295
EN
The objective of considerations is both to reach the understanding of inequality according to A.K. Sen and to pose a new query analogous to a heuristic question asked by this Indian author in his Inequality Reexamined: “quality of what?” By posing the question inequality of what?”, the author of this article attempts to demonstrate the importance of such a query for social policy, as well as its complementarity with Sen’s question “equality of what?”, pointing at the same time to specific examples of practical complexity of a process expected to eliminate social inequalities.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Od doświadczenia głodu do Nagrody Nobla

100%
Filek J.
Prakseologia
|
2014
|
issue 156
9-23
EN
It seems that some of the facts of the rich and interesting but also very instructive bio graphy of Amarty Kumar Sen, a modern economist of Indian origin, allow to understand better not only his selection of issues from a wide range of the latest economic problems, which differs from many other economists and to which he has devoted his research works, but also to understand a system of values adopted by him. Het article is therefore an attempt to reach the source of thinking of one of the most interesting contemporary economists. Th e author tries to show the deep roots of his economic and social thoughts, mainly derived from the Hindu philosophy but fi ltered through the Western way of thinking, with many interesting references to the European philosophy. The author also attempts to outline a surprisingly rich area of his interests and to draw attention to a social rank of problems undertaken by him.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Social economy as a new challenge

100%
Filek J.
Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym
|
2017
|
vol. 20
|
issue 8
41-52
EN
The article discusses the concept of the social economy. In the first part, some essential historical sources of the subject matter are described. The second part deals with the concept of social economy, taking into special consideration its definitional problems, founding values and characteristic principles as well as the dilemmas and difficulties connected with its implementation.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Ekonomia społeczna jako nowe wyzwanie

100%
Filek J.
Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym
|
2009
|
vol. 12
|
issue 1
179-188
EN
The article discusses the concept of social economy. In the first part, some essential historical sources of the subject matter are described. The second part deals with the concept of social economy, taking into special consideration its definitional problems, founding values and characteristic principles as well as dilemmas and difficulties connected with its implementation.
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Na pomoc pomocy

100%
Filek J.
Prakseologia
|
2012
|
issue 153
359-378
EN
The author analyzes aid as it is perceived nowadays. I argue that, as a result of many factors, there has been an overflow of meanings of aid and thus not everything that is commonly regarded as aid is, in fact, aid in its essential meaning. I distinguish between aid activities and apparent aid activities and indicate that, at the same time, aid elements determine that a given action becomes aid. The distinction between real aid and an apparent aid activity is important due to the fact that granting aid is a constitutive element of human nature.
8
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Rola edukacji w kształtowaniu społeczeństwa obywatelskiego

100%
Filek J.
Prakseologia
|
2005
|
issue 145
43-57
EN
It is impossible to overestimate. It seems quite obvious that citizens should be educated. It is not clear, however, to everyone what such education should look like. The article attempts to show that this education should be based on the idea of bringing-up understood, first of all, as building of the inner human being (as meant by Socrates) and, secondly, understood as the formation of social engagement abilities.
9

Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu jako nowa forma dialogu w obszarze działań gospodarczych

100%
Filek J.
Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
|
2018
|
issue 5(977)
97-113
PL
W ramach rozważań opartych na analizie filozoficzno-społecznej autorka prezentuje tezę mówiącą o idei społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu jako nowej formie dialogu społecznego. W celu poparcia tej tezy dokonuje porównania cech komunikacji społecznej (na poziomie języka potocznego), cech dialogu w sensie filozoficznym oraz cech dialogu w ujęciu społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu. Po zaprezentowaniu dialogu w ujęciu społecznej odpowiedzialności autorka opisuje antropologiczne, gospodarcze i społeczne zalety dialogu między firmami i ich interesariuszami. Jednym z zasadniczych wniosków prowadzonej w artykule analizy jest wykazanie, że w obecnej sytuacji społeczno-gospodarczej dalszy rozwój gospodarczy w coraz większym stopniu zależy od rozwoju narzędzia, jakim jest dialog firmy z interesariuszami. W ramach podsumowania wskazane zostają także niektóre korzyści, jakie firma może uzyskać z prowadzenia odpowiedzialnego dialogu z interesariuszami.
EN
Built on a philosophical and social analysis, the paper’s thesis is that corporate social responsibility is a new form of social dialogue. To support the thesis, the features of social communication (on the level of colloquial language), features of philosophical dialogue, and features of corporate social responsibility dialogue are compared. Following the presentation of the corporate social responsibility dialogue, the anthropological, economic and social advantages of a dialogue between companies and their stakeholders is described. One conclusion the analysis led to is that, in the current social-economic situation, further economic development has been increasingly dependent on a company’s dialogue with its stakeholders. Further benefits a company can derive from conducting a responsible dialogue with stakeholders are also indicated.
10

Koncepcja umowy społecznej Thomasa Hobbesa a idea społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu: podobieństwa i różnice

100%
Filek J.
Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
|
2012
|
issue 882
5-26
EN
While some thinkers have already announced the decline of the idea of the social contract, the author believes it is definitely too early to relegate the idea to the dustbin of history. She therefore returns to the idea of the social contract and tries to read it anew, using the modern idea of corporate social responsibility. In her juxtaposition of the two ideas, the author points out many similarities but also significant differences between them. She eventually reaches the conclusion that the idea of corporate social responsibility is complementary to the previously accepted contract, a new approach that allows us to improve on the historical version’s lack of cohesion to accommodate our ever more rapidly changing world.
11
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Spór o odpowiedzialność: między odpowiedzialnością jednostki a odpowiedzialnością wspólnotową

100%
Filek J.
Prakseologia
|
2016
|
vol. 158/2
35-52
PL
W związku z tym, że w filozofii współczesnej fenomen odpowiedzialności nabiera coraz istotniejszego znaczenia, autorka postanowiła przyjrzeć się jego rozumieniu w kontekście myśli liberalnej i komunitariańskiej. Artykuł jest zatem próbą porównania fenomenu odpowiedzialności w ujęciu liberałów oraz komunitarian. Zawarte w tekście rozważania prowadzą autorkę do wniosku, iż oba te stanowiska odmiennie postrzegają fenomen odpowiedzialności; liberalizm, koncentrując się nieomal wyłącznie na jego jednostkowym rozumieniu, podczas kiedy w ramach myśli komunitariańskiej otwiera się przestrzeń do jego rozumienia w ujęciu wspólnotowym.
EN
Due to the fact that in contemporary philosophy phenomenon of responsibility is becoming more significant meaning the author decided to look at its meaning in the context of liberal thought and comunitarin. The article is thus an attempt to compare the phenomenon of responsibility in terms of the liberals and communitarians. Included in the text the author considerations lead to the conclusion that both these positions differently perceive the phenomenon of responsibility, liberalism focusing almost exclusively about his understanding of the individual, while in the framework of comunitarian’s thought opens up space for its understanding in terms of the community.
12
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Czy społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu jest nową wersją umowy społecznej?

100%
Filek J.
Prakseologia
|
2009
|
issue 149
21-38
EN
The idea of social contract has been, from the very beginning, connected with a reflection on problems relative to functioning of society. Thus, from time to time, this idea was referred to in the hope that it would help solve, generally speaking, the fundamental mankind problem of a proper, as some thought, or optimal, as the other dreamed, way of society functioning. According to the authoress, the present-day social and economic problems are so serious that they require a new social agreement more adequate to problems resulting from globalisation. It seems, therefore, right to analyse a more and more popular in Europe and the USA concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and to verify whether it possesses all the most fundamental elements that allow to consider it a new social agreement or at least its outline leading to this idea in the future.
13
Content available remote

Głos w dyskusji

75%
Filek J.
Diametros
|
2005
|
issue 6
143-146
PL
Głos w debacie: Instytucjonalizacja moralności w działalności gospodarczej
14
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wprowadzenie

63%
Filek J., Guczalska K.
Prakseologia
|
2016
|
vol. 158/2
5-14
15
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wprowadzenie

63%
Filek J., Kwarciński T.
Prakseologia
|
2014
|
issue 156
5-8
16
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wprowadzenie

44%
Filek J.
Prakseologia
|
2012
|
issue 153
5-10
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.