Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 2 Logos i Ethos

Years help

  1. 1 2014

  2. 1 2013

Authors help

  1. 2 Rożdżeński R.

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Pytanie o istotę koniecznego związku, o jakim mówi treść Kartezjuszowej zasady: myślę, więc jestem

100%
Rożdżeński R.
Logos i Ethos
|
2013
|
issue 1(34)
171–189
EN
Cartesian rule cogito ergo sum is like a foundation of all Rene Descartes’s philosophy. It points to the essential relationship between subject’s own thinking and his being. How are we to understand that relationship? A thoughtful approach to that brings us to the conclusion that our being – mentioned in the Cartesian rule – must inevitably possesses a proper complex structure. This is so because our present thinking is possible at all for us only thanks to our participation in that specifically given being. Analyses carried out in this paper aim at showing how our thinking is necessarily conditioned by that complex way of being where the essence of our existence is being realized.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Zagadnienie istoty prawdy w rozprawie Martina Heideggera Bycie i czas

100%
Rożdżeński R.
Logos i Ethos
|
2014
|
issue 1(36)
151–171
EN
Heidegger claimed that traditional understanding of the truth as correspondence of the proposition with the entity is grounded in more primordial phenomena. He called them “the more fundamental truth”. Heidegger pointed out that the latter also comprise of such phenomena as Entdeckend-sein der Aussage and Erschlossenheit of the human Dasein. However, Heidegger’s attempt to call these phenomena as “the fundamental truths” can be justified only when they possessed so key character as the traditional concept of the truth. The latter understands its content as a basic regulative idea which is binding for all our thinking and talking about anything real. That is why the truth is considered as a necessary condition of possibility of any authentic bond among people. This key character of the truth does not exist in the mentioned-above phenomena. Hence, the attempt to call them “the truth” seems to be unjustified and mistaken.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.