Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
PL
Powszechnie przyjmuje się, że szkoła fizjokratów była pierwszym naukowym i spójnym systemem poglądów ekonomicznych, który opierał się na przyjętych założeniach, metodach badawczych i koncepcjach teoretycznych. Fizjokratyzm stanowił zdecydowaną reakcję przeciwko dominującemu wcześniej systemowi merkantylnemu z silnym interwencjonizmem, protekcjonizmem państwa oraz rozbudowanym systemem przywilejów i regulacji. Fizjokraci propagowali zasady leseferyzmu gospodarczego, a wśród ich najważniejszych postulatów, obok wolności gospodarczej, pojawiły się postulaty dotyczące wolności własności prywatnej i jej ochrony. Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie znaczenia własności oraz jej postrzegania w dyskursie fizjokratów. W pierwszej części artykułu wskazano kontekst społeczno--gospodarczy, w którym narodził się system fizjokratyczny. Druga część artykułu stanowi syntetyczną prezentację tezy, że fizjokraci byli rzecznikami własności prywatnej.
EN
It is generally accepted that Physiocracy’s school was the first concise and coherent system of economic views, which was based on adopted assumptions, research methods and theoretical concepts. The Physiocracy was a decided reaction against the dominant mercantile system characterized by strong interventionism, protectionist state and a complex system of privileges and regulations. The Physiocrats advocated laissez-faire economic principles, and among the most important ideas, next to economic freedom, there was an idea of private property freedom and idea of this property protection. The main aim of this paper is the presentation of the importance of ownership and its perception in the discourse of the Physiocrats. In the first part of paper the socioeconomic context where this system was born will be indicated. The second part of the paper will be a synthetic presentation of the thesis that the Physiocrats were advocates of private property.
EN
espite many crisises, for more than 200 years capitalism has been a system which does not lose its significance. The French school of regulation, which was created as an answer to the crisis of the 1970's and the co-existing phenomenon of stagflation, is trying to explain why despite numerous crisises afflicting this system, it manage to evolve and adapt to new conditions. The objective of the article is to discuss synthetically the problems of capitalism from the point of view of regulation theory. The first part of the article explains the basic principles of regulation theory. Categories such as regimes of accumulation, modes of regulation, means of production or institutional forms constitute the starting point of consideration for the regulationists. This perspective allows to explain significant reasons for crisises and to indicates many types of productions regimes and their evolution. The abovementioned issues were discussed in the second part of the article.
EN
Jean-Baptiste Say (1767-1832) was one of the most staunch supporters and exponents of liberal classical economics. His undeterred faith in automatic balance restoring thanks to market mechanism was expressed in his market law. Say's economic liberalism based on certain, indispensable principles. Economic freedom and private ownership in this French economist doctrine were foundations of economic order. Say's liberal postulates contain ideas of broadening economic freedom, especially entrepreneurship freedom, freedom of ownership and trade exchange and the necessity of proprietary rights protection.
Horyzonty Polityki
|
2016
|
vol. 7
|
issue 21
167-184
EN
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The goal of the paper is to explain the essence of megatrends, to show global trends most often perceived as megatrends, and also to present some implications of these phenomena. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The research problem can be expressed in the form of questions: Are megatrends as phenomena important? Can the method which is appropriate for conducting global trends be determined? The paper has a conceptual character; the main research methods that are applied include literature studies, the method of analysis, the method of comparative analysis and the descriptive method. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The disquisition is composed of three major parts. The first concerns conceptualisation of megatrends: definitions, the nature of the phenomenon and also identification of phenomena approached as megatrends. The second part provides explanation why research of megatrends is important. The third part presents foresight as the most often applied research method of the discussed phenomenon. RESEARCH RESULTS: With respect to definitions concerning megatrends there are no significant divergences. However, they occur at the attempt of classification of a particular phenomenon as a megatrend. Megatrends have the nature of permanent trends that in a growing degree permeate all areas of human life. Megatrends increase complexity, uncertainty and risk and accelerate feedback within and between economic, social, political, technological and environmental systems. Therefore it is necessary to monitor and assess these phenomena. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Prediction of megatrends can be an important element of the potential of an organisation, the key to economic decision-making, as well as for planning and building the strategy on different levels of economic and social area, from micro to global level. However research of megatrends is associated, among others, with the problems resulting from ambiguous classification, dynamic character of these phenomena, uncertainty they are accompanied by, and also application of an adequate research method. It is important to contribute to the development of a more innovative research agenda for effective projection of megatrends.Keywords: megatrends, global economy, globalisation, foresight.
EN
The debate among economists over the scope of state intervention in economic processes has a long history. After periods in which laissez-faire theories were dominant, views that promoted the active participation of the state in economic life increasingly came to the fore. Economic theory and business practice, both subject to fluctuations, have sometimes preferred the first approach and sometimes the second. The modern state operates in an increasingly globalized, dynamic, and turbulent environment. This changeable environment, the diversity of development levels, and the emergence of new institutions urge a redefinition of its role in modern economies. This paper contributes to the debate on the challenges and economic role of modern state and identifies some of those challenges.
PL
Spór ekonomistów dotyczący zakresu interwencji państwa w procesy gospodarcze trwa od dawna. Po okresach dominacji teorii leseferystycznych następuje wzrost znaczenia nurtów promujących aktywny udział państwa w życiu gospodarczym. Teoria ekonomiczna i praktyka gospodarcza, poddawane fluktuacjom, preferują raz jedno, raz drugie podejście. Współczesne państwo działa w coraz bardziej zglobalizowanym, dynamicznym i turbulentnym otoczeniu. Konieczność redefinicji roli państwa wynika z dynamiki współczesnych procesów gospodarczych, zróżnicowania poziomów rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego czy też wyłaniania się nowych instytucji. Artykuł stanowi głos w dyskusji dotyczącej dylematów związanych z ekonomiczną rolą państwa, a także wskazuje niektóre wyzwania stające przez współczesnym państwem.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.