Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
RU
Кем на самом деле был Шестов? Философ, который отрицал академический образец философии. Он страстно искал истину, истину в которую он сам смог бы поверить. Истина, по Шестову, никогда не может быть чем то сухим, пустой теоретической игрой в ораторскую разрядку. Oтрицал безличную форму научного разума, но также и стремления философского мышления, стремящего стать только наукой – по словам Э. Гуссерля – «строгой наукой».
EN
Who was in fact Lev Shestov? Philosopher, who rejected the academic form of philosophy. He urgently resisted to the idea that his thoughts and work could become the object of academic arguing. He was passionately looking for the truth which is alive and real. The truth according to Shestov is not in any case only a kind of dry theorizing and word games, or rhetorical exercise. He refused any kind of nonpersonal form of scientific mind but at the same time also the philosophic thinking which wanted to become only the science – according to E. Husserl – the strict science.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2006
|
vol. 61
|
issue 5
359-368
EN
The paper deals with the rise of modern thought in connection with the origins of modern mathematical science. Leibniz, one of the founding fathers of modern science and the language of science (characteristica universalis), scientific questions and modern knowledge as such, is an extraordinary thinker among others because of his comprehensiveness. He aimed at a new synthesis of science, which should first of all maintain the unity of science, philosophy and morals (or ethics). By the help of the notions such as 'cleverness', 'brightness', 'calculating and considering reason' Leibniz wanted to stress his conviction, that the topical questions of his time could be resolved only in dependence on creative thinking and mainly moral action.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2023
|
vol. 78
|
issue 8
649 – 663
EN
Through the texts of philosophers and philosophizing artists, musicians and writers, the study opens up the problem of the relationship between philosophy and art, science and philosophy, using atypical ways of inquiring about life, man and his times, not only through reason, but also through the heart. An important moment in the search for intersections and connections is the history – the topos of that which was – as captured in the works, correspondence and conversations of selected giants of European culture. The intention of the study is to highlight the fact that behind an artistic, philosophical or scientific work, which we may nowadays already consider as a classic, an unproblematic “thing at our disposal,” there is often hidden a life experience of a tragic existence. And even in turbulent times of crises, it is important to remember, as Ortega y Gasset reminds us, that to lose illusions is not to lose hope.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.