Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 7

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

NIEZNANY LIST FRYDERYKA ALEMBEKA DO WŁADYSŁAWA DOMINIKA ZASŁAWSKIEGO-OSTROGSKIEGO ZE ZBIORÓW SKOKLOSTER W RIKSARKIVET W SZTOKHOLMIE

100%
Gałuszka J.
Rocznik Przemyski
|
2018
|
vol. 54
|
issue 1(21): Historia
267-275
EN
The letter from the Skokloster collection is an interesting example of the relations between a very important figure in the church hierarchy of the Przemyśl diocese and one of the richest magnates in the then Ruthenian province. In the letter Alembek informs of the death of his patron, the Przemyśl bishop Paweł Piasecki (1579-1649), the Przemyśl ordinary in the years 1644-1649, historian and author of theological writings. Alembek shares with Ostrogski his doubts as to his own future. The letter was found in the Skokloster collection in Riksarkivet in Stockholm.
2

„PRZEMOWA JMCI PANA JANA SZĘSNEGO HERBOTA STAROSTY WIŚNIEN NA SEJMIKU WYSZYŃSKI NA TEN CZAS, GDY SIĘ WRÓCIŁ Z POSELSTWA TURECKIEGO 1589AO” – EDYCJA ŹRÓDŁA

100%
Gałuszka J.
Rocznik Przemyski
|
2017
|
vol. 53
|
issue 1(20): Historia
215-236
EN
This paper discusses a speech by Jan Szczęsny Herburt (1567-1616) delivered presumably on 19 January 1600 at the regional diet (summoned prior to the National Diet) in Sądowa Wisznia. The speech included not only his impressions from the mission to the Ottoman Porte in 1598 but also his opinion on the current internal and external policies of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The text confirms the author’s good education and considerable refinement, as well as his notable oratorical skills.
3

KILKA UWAG DO NAJNOWSZEJ BIOGRAFII „UCZONEGO WARCHOŁA” – JANA SZCZĘSNEGO HERBURTA

100%
Gałuszka J.
Rocznik Przemyski
|
2018
|
vol. 54
|
issue 1(21): Historia
411-420
4

POSELSTWO JANA SZCZĘSNEGO HERBURTA DO PORTY OTTOMAŃSKIEJ (1598 R.) I NIEUDANA PRÓBA JEGO RECEPCJI NA SEJMIKU WISZEŃSKIM

100%
Gałuszka J.
Rocznik Przemyski
|
2017
|
vol. 53
|
issue 1(20): Historia
3-18
EN
This paper discusses a legation of Jan Szczęsny Herburt (1567–1616) to Ottoman Porte and its’ effect among local nobility of Przemyśl Land. Herburt delivered a speech presumably on 19 January 1600 at the regional diet (summoned prior to the National Diet) in Sądowa Wisznia. The speech included not only his impressions from the mission to the Ottoman Porte in 1598 but also his opinion on the current internal and external policies of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The text confirms the author’s good education and considerable refinement, as well as his notable oratorical skills.
5

KILKA UWAG W KWESTII KAZNODZIEJSTWA PRZEMYSKIEGO FRANCISZKANINA KONRADA KAWALEWSKIEGO

100%
Gałuszka J.
Rocznik Przemyski
|
2017
|
vol. 53
|
issue 2(21): Literatura i Język
233-239
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

„Akt sławny, wielki i nigdy w Polszcze niewidziany…” Warszawski triumf Stanisława Żółkiewskiego (1611) na tle uroczystości z 1583 roku

100%
Gałuszka J.
Zapiski Historyczne
|
2019
|
vol. 84
|
issue 2
171-203
EN
The article discusses the military triumph of the Crown Field Hetman Stanisław Żółkiewski, which took place in November 1611 in Warsaw during the General Sejm, as against a similar ceremony in 1583. Both of those events crowned the war struggle with the Muscovite state and were closely associated with the Polish-Lithuanian triumphs over the eastern neighbour. In both cases, those spectacles constituted the crowning achievement of long-standing fights. Triumphs were organized in Cracow and Warsaw, and its spectators were the country’s political elites gathered at the wedding of Jan Zamoyski with Gryzelda Batory (1583) and participants of the Sejm. One can also indicate a wider audience, which was the noble society, because the propaganda activities undertaken by Stefan Batory and Sigismund III Vasa were to bring not only desired short-term results, e.g. introducing taxes for the continuation of the war with Muscovy, but also long-term effects by shaping political attitudes desired in a given moment. In both cases, the originators of the triumphal marches could obtain information from one of the chapters of Hetman’s Books of Stanisław Sarnicki. The author collected there the most important comments related to the organization of such marches. Żółkiewski’s triumph was closely related to the capture of the Smolensk fortress and the defeat of the Muscovite army near Kłuszyn in 1610. Those events gave rise to the organization of another triumph, but this time not of the king himself, but of the hetman. It was to be used primarily as an argument for the nobility sitting in parliament to pass the taxes necessary for further warfare. The analysis and comparison of both celebrations show that much greater effort was put into organizing the Cracow events of 1583. Their artistic and ideological setting was given great attention to detail. Twenty-eight years later, participants and observers of the Warsaw triumph did not experience similar impressions. Neither the king nor his entourage took care of preparing the scenario of the ceremony, music or elements of occasional architecture, etc. Many people took part in the Cracow events: dancers, musicians, actors, soldiers and exotic animals. In 1611, the triumph in Warsaw was extremely simple. Not much attention was paid to the preparations. The course of events shows the animosities between Sigismund III and Stanisław Żółkiewski along with the lack of a unified position towards the Muscovite state. The article was supplemented with a critical source edition of one of the descriptions of the events of 1611. The text is stored in a collection of manuscript documents – the so called “miscellanea” in the Czartoryski Library in Cracow. The author of this account is unknown, although he probably witnessed the Warsaw triumph, which is indicated, for example, by detailed descriptions of the appearance of Muscovite prisoners of war.
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

„Powinność oddajecie Waszmościowie patriarsze”. Mowa Feliksa Kryskiego na pogrzebie prymasa Jana Tarnowskiego 9 października 1604 r. jako element staropolskiego ceremoniału pogrzebowego

100%
Gałuszka J.
Wschodni Rocznik Humanistyczny
|
2020
|
vol. XVII (2020)
|
issue 3: Dwór w Rzeczypospolitej i państwach ościennych, pod red. Artura Goszczyńskiego i A. Selina
83-96
PL
Artykuł prezentuje jeden z elementów XVII-wiecznych uroczystości pogrzebowych, jakim były okolicznościowe przemówienia bliskiego krewnego, przyjaciela lub znajomego, które uzupełniały kazania kaznodziejów. Niniejszy tekst stanowi omówienie i krytyczne wydanie źródłowe przemówienia Feliksa Kryskiego (1562–1618 na pogrzebie jego mentora i politycznego przewodnika, prymasa Jana Tarnowskiego (1552–1604). Kryski był znakomitym mówcą, pisarzem i politykiem. Wielokrotnie przemawiał w czasie obrad sejmu, nie stronił również od oratorstwa okolicznościowego. Celem utworu było dokonanie nowoczesnej edycji, która została przybliża tekst staropolski szerszemu kręgowi odbiorców.
EN
The article presents one of the elements of the 17th-century funeral ceremonies – occasional speeches given by a close relative, friend or acquaintance, which complemented the preachers' sermons. This text is an overview and critical source edition of Feliks Kryski's speech (1562–1618) at the funeral of his mentor and political guide, Primate Jan Tarnowski (1552–1604). Kryski was an excellent speaker, writer and politician. He spoke many times during the sessions of the Sejm and did not avoid occasional oratories. The aim of this article is to make a modern edition, which brings the Old Polish text closer to a wider audience.
RU
В статье представлен один из элементов похоронных обрядов XVII в. - случайные выступления близких родственников, друзей или знакомых, дополнявшие проповеди проповедника. Этот текст представляет собой обсуждение и критическое издание речи Феликса Крыского (1562–1618) на похоронах его наставника и политического наставника примаса Яна Тарновского (1552–1604). Крыски был прекрасным оратором, писателем и политиком. Много раз давал речи во время сеймов, не избегая также и случайного ораторского искусства. Целью работы было сделать современное издание, которое приблизило бы старопольский текст к более широкой аудитории.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.