Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 2 Acta Neophilologica

Years help

  1. 1 2012

  2. 1 2006

Authors help

  1. 2 Довгополый Я.

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

ДОПЕТРОВСКИЕ ЛЕКСИЧЕСКИЕ ЗАИМСТВОВАНИЯ ИЗ НИДЕРЛАНДСКОГО ЯЗЫКА

100%
Довгополый Я.
Acta Neophilologica
|
2012
|
vol. XIV/1
19-30
EN
The article analyzes the borrowing from the Dutch language taking into account the etymological and historical aspects. The origins of relations between Russia and the Netherlands lie in those distant times, when the European system of political, trade and other relations developed itself. The beginning of this relationship can perhaps be traced back to the example of Staraya Ladoga, city in northern Russia, which for eight centuries before the founding of St. Petersburg in 1703, was the first key port on the main trade route of ancient Russia “from the Vikings to the Greeks”. In the beginning of the XII century merchant guilds have begun nucleation alliance of cities, mostly in the basin of the North and Baltic seas, the so-called Hanseatic League. Since the main centers of which activities were carried out of the Hanseatic League was North and East Germany, the Netherlands, respectively, then the language of communication of the Hanseatic League was Low German. This article discusses the scope of the term “German”, which is characterized by considerable inconsistency. In modern Netherlandistic to refer to this controversial use the term bifurcation, which is derived from Latin bifurcus – “forked”. Dialects of Low German are widely spoken in the northeastern area of the Netherlands (Dutch Low Saxon) and are written there with an orthography based on Dutch orthography.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Этнофолизмы как прозвища с эмоционально-экспрессивной оценкой

100%
Довгополый Я.
Acta Neophilologica
|
2006
|
issue VIII
49-57
EN
The present article deals with the nicknames based on expressive and emotional evaluation. Those characteristics are based on conceptual partition of the world into the following categories: WE - OUR - THEY - STRANGE. The categorization based on the principles WE (ARE GOOD) - THEY (ARE BAD) is connected with explicit and implicit evaluation aimed at making the native ethnos gracious and at insulting the foreign ethnos. Despite the ‘dipolar moment’, the appearance of new nicknames at the given step of a language development is not easy to predict.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.