Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Accounting Integration Issues of EU Member States

100%
Kamela-Sowińska A.
Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
|
2015
|
vol. 10
|
issue 2
223-236
EN
The aim of this article is to discuss the dilemmas over the integration of accounting in EU member states. The dilemma could be divided into the following main groups. Dilemma of the user of financial statements. This dilemma consists in determining for whom the integration of accounting in EU is crucial, and who is the intended beneficiary of integration. Dilemma arising from the lack of theoretical framework for drafting directives and standards: the accounting paradigm assuming that accounting is strictly quantitative. Accounting is a social science, whereas the accounting practice has greater influence on social, rather than purely economic, reality. Dilemma over legal regulations and the legitimization of standard setters could be attributed to accounting regulations as legal norms. A classic example of this might be the transition from rule-based to principle-based IFRSs. The dilemma over the legitimization of standard setters has its roots in the legal aspect of accountancy. In order to solve it, it is necessary to answer the question: ‘who controls the processes of accounting integration?’ since the participants of this process often present divergent viewpoints, and sometimes even opposite priorities. Dilemma over the politicization of accountancy. The more globalized and complex the economic environment is, the more of political intervention there is expected to be in the standard setting process, affected by global geopolitical trends.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Kryteria wyboru metody wyceny przedsiębiorstw państwowych na potrzeby prywatyzacji w Polsce w świetle dotychczasowej praktyki

100%
Kamela-Sowińska A., Akademia Ekonomiczna w Poznaniu
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica
|
1993
|
vol. 127
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Rola środowiska akademickiego w kontradyktoryjnym procesie karnym w Polsce po zmianie kodeksu postępowania karnego

100%
Kamela-Sowińska A.
Studia Ekonomiczne
|
2016
|
vol. 284
214-222
PL
Cel – wskazanie na rolę ekonomicznego środowiska akademickiego w ocenie i osądzie prawidłowości prowadzenia procesów gospodarczych i ochronie obrotu gospodarczego poprzez stopniowe włączanie się w procesy sądowe. W efekcie, do czego sprowadza się teza, znacznie wzrośnie dowodowa rola rachunkowości, a wraz z nią zapotrzebowanie na niezależne opinie ekspertów pochodzących ze środowisk akademickich. Metody/podejścia badawcze – zastosowano metodę badania teoretyczno-prawnego i badania nad stanem i funkcjonowaniem obowiązującego prawa. Wartości poznawcze – wykazano, że zmiana kodeksu postępowania karnego (k.p.k.) w Polsce uświadomi i spowoduje znacznie większe włączenie się środowiska akademickiego – szczególnie dotyczy to obszarów rachunkowości i finansów – w obsługę karnych procesów gospodarczych, co będzie realizacją postulatów i wytycznych MNISW odnoszących się do łączenia nauki i praktyki.
EN
The Polish Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) is forced on July 1, 2015. The most fundamental changes relate to the rules regarding the process of criminal trials, where the Court will not be entitled to play as active a role in the evidentiary part of proceedings. Expert evidences as the independent product of the expert uninfluenced as to form or content by the exigencies of litigation will play the significant role. Expert evidence is sought most obviously in disputes requiring detailed scientific or technical knowledge. Academic accounting and finance experts will play the most important role in incoming criminal procedure.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.