Search results

1

Zofia Brzozowska, Święta księżna kijowska Olga - wybór tekstów źródłowych, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2014

100%

Szefliński B.

Przegląd Rusycystyczny

|

2016

|

issue 1

PL

recenzja książki Zofia Brzozowska, Święta księżna kijowska Olga - wybór tekstów źródłowych, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2014

2

Kilka uwag na rzecz rehabilitacji zapomnianej filiacji Stefana Nemanji

100%

Szefliński B.

Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia

|

2015

|

vol. 22

|

issue 2

4-15

EN

Contemporary historians agree that the father of grand prince Stephen Nemanja was Zavida. This opinion is based on the comparison of genealogical data from different sources. The data, however, is not as unequivocal as it is supposed to be. The close analysis of the account of Ansbert, the chronicler of the third crusade, suggests a different understanding of some of the data. It should be admitted that the discussion concerning the identity of Nemanja’s father was closed too early. The seals of Nemanja and his brother Stracimir prove beyond doubt that both brothers had the same name Stephen. Most probably they inherited the same names from their father. Even though already at the end of 1980s Jan Leśny in one of his works mentioned this fact, it still has not been properly explored in historiography. However, this observation lets us assume that Nemanja’s father could be Stephen Vukan, known only from reference made by Anna Komnene. Such a filiation has been already presented but on the basis of wrong premises. Now it receives a deserved recognition.

PL

Contemporary historians agree that the father of grand župan Stephen Nemanja was Zavida. This opinion is based on convergent evidence of genealogical data from different sources. The data, however, is not as unequivocal as it is supposed to be. A more detailed analysis of the account of Ansbert, the chronicler of the third crusade, suggests a different understanding of some of the data. It should be admitted that the discussion concerning the identity of Nemanja’s father was ceased too early. The seals of Nemanja and his real brother Stracimir prove beyond doubt that both brothers had the same name Stephen; most probably they inherited it from their father. Even though at the end of 1980s Jan Leśny in one of his works already mentioned this fact, it still has not been properly explored in historiography. However, this observation lets us assume that Nemanja’s father could be Stephen Vukan, known only from reference made by Anna Komnene. Such a filiation has been already presented but on the basis of wrong premises. Now it receives a deserved recognition.

3

Kiedy i gdzie została wystawiona Chilandarska povelja Stefana Nemanjicia?

100%

Szefliński B.

Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia

|

2019

|

vol. 26

93-104

EN

The so-called Second Charter for Hilandar given by Stephen Nemanjić is one of the oldest Serbian documents that preserved to our times. It dates itself on 29th September, but without any year or indiction. Since the publishing of Aleksandar Solovjev's paper in 1925 it had been commonly accepted that the charter was given before 1202 because Stephen Nemanjić could name himself the son-in-law of emperor Alexios III Angelos only before the divorce with Eudokia Angelina. However, in 2010 Đorđe Bubalo has noticed that two later inscriptions – discovered after Solovjev's research – also emphasizes family connections between Nemanjić dynasty and Alexios, so the argument used by Solovjev cannot be held. Therefore, Bubalo has reanalysed the charter and suggested a new dating – to 1207-1208. However, one of his arguments – the Second Charter for Hilandar was used by Sava Nemanjić when writing the Life of Blessed Symeon – has lost its strength as such a relation between these texts is questioned in the newest research. Therefore, the objective of the hereby paper is to provide a new analysis of the Second Charter for Hilandar focused on when and (for the first time) where the document was given. The conclusion is that it happened after the hierophany of St Symeon – most probably on 29th September 1210 in the Hilandar monastery.

PL

Tak zwana Druga chilandarska povelja Stefana Nemanjicia jest jednym z najstarszych serbskich dokumentów zachowanych do naszych czasów. Jest ona opatrzona datą 29 IX, ale bez żadnego roku ani indykcji. Od publikacji artykułu Aleksandara Solovjeva w 1925 r. powszechnie przyjmowano, że przywilej został wystawiony przed 1202 r., ponieważ Stefan Nemanjić mógł nazwać siebie zięciem cesarza Aleksego III Angelosa jedynie przed rozwodem z Eudoksją Angeliną. Jednak w 2010 r. Đorđe Bubalo zauważył, że dwie późniejsze inskrypcje – odkryte po badaniach Solovjeva – również podkreślają powiązania rodzinne pomiędzy dynastią Nemanjiciów a Aleksym, więc argument Solovjeva nie może zostać utrzymany. Z tego powodu Bubalo ponownie przeanalizował przywilej i zaproponował nowe datowanie – na lata 1207-1208. Jednak jeden z jego argumentów – Druga chilandarska povelja wykorzystana przez Sawę przy pisaniu Żywota błogosławionego Symeona – stracił swoją siłę, gdyż taki związek pomiędzy tekstami został zakwestionowany w najnowszych badaniach. Z tego powodu celem niniejszego artykułu jest dostarczenie nowej analizy Drugiej chilandarskiej povelji skoncentrowanej na tym, kiedy i (po raz pierwszy) gdzie dokument został wystawiony. W konkluzji stwierdzono, że miało to miejsce po hierofanii św. Symeona – najprawdopodobniej 29 IX 1210 r. w Chilandarze.

4

O tajemniczym poprzedniku wielkiego żupana Serbii Stefana Nemanji, zwanym Tihomirem

100%

Szefliński B.

Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia

|

2016

|

vol. 23

35-46

EN

The paper is focused on the figure of the predecessor of grand župan Stephen Nemanja. The name of thismysterious person has not been preserved in any source. However mentions in different sources enable toresearch major facts in his life. On the basis of convergent evidence of several sources, his name can bereconstructed as Stephen Tihomir. He was born probably about 1105 as the first son of one of membersof Vukanović dynasty – Stephen Vukan or Zavida. In his childhood he spent a few years in Zeta wherehis father escaped from Raška. There is no data about Tihomir until the year 1165 when he was appointedgrand župan by the emperor Manuel Komnenos. During his short reign he was driven by his brothersto capture the youngest one – Nemanja. However Nemanja managed to flee and take over the throne.Nemanja’s brothers had to escape. They came back with the Byzantine troops commanded by TheodorPadiates but they lost in the battle near Pantino. One of the brothers was drowned in the Sitnica river then.Most scholars believe it was Tihomir but more careful analysis of sources suggests it was another brotherof Nemanja (maybe his name was Constantin), not his predecessor. It is hard to say what happened toTihomir after the battle – maybe he lived in Skopie, maybe he came back to Serbia, acknowledged hisyoungest brother supreme power and received his own principality. If he had come back, he would havedied before September 27th 1186.

PL

The paper is focused on the figure of the predecessor of grand župan Stephen Nemanja. The name of thismysterious person has not been preserved in any source. However mentions in different sources enable toresearch major facts in his life. On the basis of convergent evidence of several sources, his name can bereconstructed as Stephen Tihomir. He was born probably about 1105 as the first son of one of membersof Vukanović dynasty – Stephen Vukan or Zavida. In his childhood he spent a few years in Zeta wherehis father escaped from Raška. There is no data about Tihomir until the year 1165 when he was appointedgrand župan by the emperor Manuel Komnenos. During his short reign he was driven by his brothersto capture the youngest one – Nemanja. However Nemanja managed to flee and take over the throne.Nemanja’s brothers had to escape. They came back with the Byzantine troops commanded by TheodorPadiates but they lost in the battle near Pantino. One of the brothers was drowned in the Sitnica river then.Most scholars believe it was Tihomir but more careful analysis of sources suggests it was another brotherof Nemanja (maybe his name was Constantin), not his predecessor. It is hard to say what happened toTihomir after the battle – maybe he lived in Skopie, maybe he came back to Serbia, acknowledged hisyoungest brother supreme power and received his own principality. If he had come back, he would havedied before September 27th 1186,

5

Chronologia życia Stefana Nemanji. Próba uporządkowania

100%

Szefliński B.

Roczniki Historyczne

|

2014

|

vol. 80

PL

Lebensstationen des Stephan Nemanja: Ein OrdnungsversuchZusammenfassungDer Lebenslauf und die Herrschaft des serbischen Großžupans Stephan Nemanja gehört zu den nicht endenden Problemen der serbischen Historiographie. Die in der bisherigen Forschung erfolgte qualitative Analyse der Quellen erwies sich als ein unvollkommenes Mittel, da sie die vielen Forscher zu gegensätzlichen Ergebnissen führte. Damit ist es nun an der Zeit, sich der quantitativen Analyse zu bedienen, bei der jede Angabe, die in den Quellen vorkommt, als eine eigene Einheit behandelt wird. Durch den Einsatz dieser Methode läßt sich die Art der Jahreszählung feststellen, die sein Sohn und Hagiograph Sava Nemanjic anwandte. Dies wiederum führt in Verbindung mit den Angaben aus anderen zeitnahen Quellen zu neuen Ergebnissen, die sich folgendermaßen darstellen: Geboren ist Nemanja nach dem 14. Februar / 2. März 1112, spätestens am 25. März 1112 / 1. März 1113. Er wurde zwei Mal getauft, das zweite Mal als er nicht mehr als vier Jahre zählte, also vor dem 25. März 1116 / 1. März 1117. Er empfi ng einen Teil des väterlichen Erbes nach dem 14. Februar / 2. März 1126, auf jeden Fall vor dem 25. März 1134 / 1. März 1135. Die Herrschaft über Globočica und damit die Stellung eines Fürsten erlangte er in jedem Fall nach dem 8. April 1143, höchstwahrscheinlich 1155 oder 1158. Er geriet in einen Konflikt mit seinen Brüdern und wurde frühestens 1165, spätestens 1168 Großžupan. Mönch ist er am 25. März 1195 geworden. Im Kloster Studenica blieb er bis zum 8. Oktober 1197, und bis zum 2. November 1197 gelangte er auf den Berg Athos. Er zog sich schließlich zwischen dem 14./16. Mai und 13./15. Juni 1198 in das Kloster Hilandar zurück. Chronology of Stefan Nemanja’s life: an attempt at settling things downAbstractThe paper analyses all information concerning the chronology of the life of grand zupan Stefan Nemanja from the sources close to the events, with special attention paid to the data included in the works written by his sons Stefan and Sava. The question has been a matter of controversy and scholarly discussion for over 130 years. Because the qualitative analysis used so far proved unreliable, the author decided to apply quantitative analysis, which has not been considered until now. This method allows to discover the way years were calculated by Sava, and this forms the basis of further modifications.

6

Odpowiedź na recenzję prof. Ilony Czamańskiej

75%

Szefliński B.

Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia

|

2017

|

vol. 24

241-245

Refine search results

4 Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia

1 Przegląd Rusycystyczny

1 Roczniki Historyczne

1 2019

1 2017

2 2016

1 2015

1 2014

6 Szefliński B.

Zofia Brzozowska, Święta księżna kijowska Olga - wybór tekstów źródłowych, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2014

Kilka uwag na rzecz rehabilitacji zapomnianej filiacji Stefana Nemanji

Kiedy i gdzie została wystawiona Chilandarska povelja Stefana Nemanjicia?

O tajemniczym poprzedniku wielkiego żupana Serbii Stefana Nemanji, zwanym Tihomirem

Chronologia życia Stefana Nemanji. Próba uporządkowania

Odpowiedź na recenzję prof. Ilony Czamańskiej