Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 10

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Public service is characterized by a number of restrictions. A police officer must submit to a special type of regime resulting from the character of the service he performs. He is obliged to perform binding orders and service commands issued by his superior. Non-performance or improper performance of orders and service commands may cause consequences of a service nature, i.e. disciplinary liability. Establishing during disciplinary proceedings that a police officer has violated service discipline or has not followed the rules of professional ethics may result in them being subjected to disciplinary punishment. However, there are also other consequences that may cause a violation of service discipline or non-compliance with the rules of professional ethics confirmed in the final ruling of disciplinary proceedings. One of these is the necessity of reducing the annual award given to a police officer. This paper is entirely devoted to the issues related to the legal structure of reducing the annual award based on Art. 110 (5) (2) Act on the Police. This issue is of significant importance for Police authorities obliged to apply the legal provisions of service pragmatics as well as for police officers themselves because causes consequences in the financial sphere of a police officer. Violation of service discipline established in the final ruling of disciplinary proceedings is the most common reason for the need to reduce a police officer’s annual award. The application of this legal institution requires establishing that the final ruling of disciplinary proceedings confirming the violation of service discipline or non-compliance with the rules of professional ethics by a police officer exists in legal circulation. Attention is focused on the prerequisite of reducing the annual award. It is also indicated which entity is obliged to issue a decision on reducing the annual award, and procedural issues related to this institution are discussed. Discussion of this matter is preceded by a discussion of the issues related to the institution of the annual award, because such a reduction may only take place if a police officer previously obtained a right to this award.
EN
This paper focuses solely on issues related to the obligatory suspension of police officers from official duties. The relevant provisions are contained in Art. 39 (1) of the Act of 6 April 1990 on the Police. Suspension from official duties is obligatory when the stage of preparatory proceedings conducted against a police officer changes from in rem to ad personam. Such change automatically results in loss of impeccable opinion, which is a necessary condition for serving in the Police. Attention is focused on the objective to be achieved by the institution. The limits of the meaning of the phrase “initiation of proceedings against a police officer” were also indicated as a prerequisite for the application of the legal construction of Art. 39 (1) of the Police Act.
EN
On October 1st 2020, a new institution was introduced to the Act on the Police – the incentive benefit. It is intended by the legislature to keep officers with at least 25 years active service. Awarding this benefit depends on the period of service held by the officer. The regulation relating to the incentive benefit also provides for a number of negative premises, the materialization of which results in the refusal to grant the benefit. This article is entirely devoted to the issue related to the refusal to grant an incentive benefit in the cause of initiating criminal proceedings against a Police officer. It was therefore necessary to indicate at what point the stage of criminal proceedings changes from in rem to ad personam, because this results in initiating them against a specific person. The change in the stage of criminal proceedings depends on the offence it concerns. If it is a public prosecution offense, the change takes place in connection with the presentation of charges to the specific person. However, in the context of Art. 120a (7) (2) Act on the Police, the initiation of criminal proceedings against a specific person should be equated with the very fact of drawing up a decision on the presentation of charges. However, it is different in the situation specified in Art. 55 § 1 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, or in proceedings in cases prosecuted by private prosecution. The mere submitting of a subsidiary indictment, private indictment or complaint results in the initiation of proceedings against a specific person, provided that they have been submitted effectively. It was also emphasized that the administrative authority is bound by decisions undertaken in the criminal proceedings and cannot make any independent determinations in this regard, as it cannot interfere with the competences reserved to another entity.
EN
This article has been completely devoted to the issues which concern delegating a police officer from the office for temporary service in a different organizational unit of the Police or in another locality on the basis of Art. 36 (1) of the Act of 6 April 1990 on the Police, as well as the scope of protection resulting from Art. 32 of the Act of May 23, 1991 on Trade Unions in reference to a police officer who is a member of a trade union organisation of police officers. The provisions of the Act on Trade Unions must take into account specific features of the service relationship. Therefore, the construction of the legal ties has been discussed, including the characteristic features of this legal structure. In the following part, the reference is made to the provision of Art. 32 of the Act on Trade Unions and the scope of its permissible application to a police officer who is a member of a trade union organisation, and to the protection that this provision provides in particular.
PL
Niniejszy artykuł w całości został poświecony omówieniu zagadnienia dotyczącego delegowania policjanta z urzędu do czasowego pełnienia służby w innej jednostce organizacyjnej Policji lub w innej miejscowości na podstawie art. 36 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 6 kwietnia 1990 r. o Policji, a także zakresu ochrony wynikającego z art. 32 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych przewidzianego dla policjanta będącego członkiem organizacji związku zawodowego policjantów. Stosowanie regulacji ustawy o związkach zawodowych musi uwzględniać specyfikę i charakter stosunku służbowego. Wobec tego omówiono konstrukcję tej więzi prawnej, a także wskazano charakterystyczne cechy tej konstrukcji prawnej. W dalszej części odniesiono się do przepisu art. 32 ustawy o związkach zawodowych oraz do zakresu jego dopuszczalnego stosowania do policjanta członka organizacji związku zawodowego, a w szczególności ochrony jaką przepis ten przewiduje.
EN
This paper was entirely devoted to the issues connected with the prohibition of membership in a political party of an officer of the Internal Security Agency and Foreign Intelligence Agency and the participation in the activities of that party or on its behalf. This prohibition was established in Article 81 (1) of the Act of 24 May 2002 of the Internal Security Agency and Foreign Intelligence Agency. Public service requires the introduction of certain restrictions on the rights of officers in relation to the rest of members of society. Political neutrality guarantees proper implementation of the tasks and aims of this formation. There was indicated that aforementioned provision of Article 81 (1) of the Act of 24 May 2002 of the Internal Security Agency and Foreign Intelligence Agency contains two independent legal norms i.e. prohibition of membership in a political party and prohibition of participation in the activities of political party or on its behalf. Attention was therefore focused on indicating the limits of these prohibitions. In this aspect, the sphere of official behavior has been demarcated. There was also underlined that these limits in question do not violate the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Polish Constitution.
PL
Służba publiczna ma charakter selekcyjny. To oznacza, że nie każdy, kto się ubiega o przyjęcie do niej, musi zostać przyjęty. Wszystkie formacje zmilitaryzowane (paramilitarne) odrębnie określają wymogi, których spełnienie umożliwia nawiązanie więzi prawnej z kandydatem do służby, tj. stosunku służbowego. Również w art. 44 Ustawy z  dnia 24 maja 2002 r. o  Agencji Bezpieczeństwa Wewnętrznego oraz Agencji Wywiadu (dalej: ustawa o  ABW oraz AW) enumeratywnie zostały wskazane cechy, jakimi powinna legitymować się osoba fizyczna zgłaszająca gotowość podjęcia służby w tych formacjach. Jedną z  nich jest warunek wymieniony w  art. 44 pkt 5 ustawy o  ABW oraz AW4. Kandydat do służby musi być gotowy do poddania się szczególnego rodzaju 1 Szerzej na temat stosunku służbowego zob. T. Kuczyński, E. Mazurczak-Jasińska, J. Stelina, Stosunek służbowy, w: System prawa administracyjnego, t. 11, R. Hauser, Z. Niewiadomski, A. Wróbel (red.), Warszawa 2011; P. Szustakiewicz, Stosunki służbowe funkcjonariuszy służb mundurowych i żołnierzy zawodowych jako sprawa administracyjna, Warszawa 2012; M. Wieczorek, Charakter prawny stosunków służbowych funkcjonariuszy służb mundurowych, Toruń 2017; także: P. Gacek, Nawiązanie stosunku służbowego z funkcjonariuszem Agencji Bezpieczeństwa Wewnętrznego i Agencji Wywiadu. Charakter prawny mianowania - wybrane aspekty, „Przegląd Bezpieczeństwa Wewnętrznego” 2020, nr 22, s. 98 i nast., i przywołana tam literatura.
EN
This paper is entirely devoted to the prerequisite of obligatory suspension of an officer of the Internal Security Agency or the Foreign Intelligence Agency. This regulation is included in the Article 58 sec. 1 of the Act on the Internal Security Agency and the Foreign Intelligence Agency. Suspension from official duties is obligatory in the event of an initiation of criminal proceedings in the case of an intent offence subjected to a public accusation. Therefore, attention was focused on the wording: “initiation of criminal proceedings in the case of intent offence prosecuted with public accusation against an officer of the International Security Agency and the Foreign Intelligence Agency” as a condition enabling the use of the legal construct included in Article 58 sec. 1 of the Act on the International Security Agency and the Foreign Intelligence Agency. This happens in a situation of changing the phase of preparatory proceedings in the criminal case prosecuted against an officer of the International Security Agency or the Foreign Intelligence Agency from in rem to ad personam, submitting subsidiary indictment to the court and reopening of the criminal proceedings.
PL
Artykuł został poświęcony problematyce związanej z przesłanką obligatoryjnego zawieszenia funkcjonariusza ABW albo AW w czynnościach służbowych. Ta regulacja jest zawarta w art. 58 ust. 1 Ustawy z dnia 24 maja 2002 r. o Agencji Bezpieczeństwa Wewnętrznego oraz Agencji Wywiadu. Zawieszenie w czynnościach służbowych jest obowiązkowe w przypadku wszczęcia postępowania karnego w sprawie o przestępstwo umyślne ścigane z oskarżenia publicznego. Uwagę skoncentrowano na sformułowaniu „wszczęcie postępowania karnego o przestępstwo umyślne ścigane z oskarżenia publicznego przeciwko funkcjonariuszowi ABW albo AW” jako na przesłance warunkującej zastosowanie konstrukcji prawnej zawartej w art. 58 ust. 1 ustawy o ABW i AW. Następuje to w sytuacji zmiany stadium postępowania przygotowawczego prowadzonego wobec funkcjonariusza ABW albo AW z in rem w ad personam, wniesienia subsydiarnego aktu oskarżenia do sądu, a także wznowienia postępowania karnego.
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych
|
2019
|
vol. 29
|
issue 4
201-221
PL
Artykuł został poświęcony problematyce związanej z konstrukcją prawną nagrody rocznej. Instytucja ta została uregulowana w art. 110 ustawy z dnia 6 kwietnia 1990 r. o Policji. Omówiono warunki formalne, których spełnienie uprawnia do nabycia tego prawa, a także wskazano podmioty uprawnione do przyznania nagrody rocznej. Skoncentrowano również uwagę na kwestii zwolnienia ze służby w Policji, w tym na podstawie art. 41 ust. 2 pkt 5 ustawy o Policji i wskazano, w jakich okolicznościach zwolniony policjant nabywa uprawnienia do nagrody rocznej.
EN
The article is devoted to the issues related to the legal structure of the annual award. This institution is regulated in the Art. 110 of April 6, 1990 on the Police. Formal conditions which have to be fulfilled to entitle and acquire this right were discussed. There were also indicated entities entitled to the annual award. Attention was also focused on the issue related to the dissmision from the Police, in particular on the Art. 41 (2) (5) Act on the Police and there was indicated in which circumstances in these situations dismissed police officer acquires the right to annual reward.
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych
|
2021
|
vol. 31
|
issue 1
27-42
EN
The article is entirely devoted to the issues related to the dismission from the service in the Police based on the Art. 41 (2) (4) Act on the Police. This provision conditions the dismission of a police officer from the fact of acquiring the right to a pension due to reaching 30 years of retirement service. Therefore, the prerequisite for the application of this legal ground for dismission from service was discussed. However, the decision in this respect is of a discretionary nature. Thus, it requires taking into account both the public interest and the legitimate interest of the party. Therefore, the limit of administrative discretion justifying the decision to dismiss on this legal ground was indicated.
PL
Niniejszy artykuł został w całości poświęcony problematyce zwolnienia ze służby na podstawie art. 41 ust. 2 pkt 4 ustawy o Policji. Przepis ten warunkuje zwolnienie policjanta od faktu nabycia przez niego prawa do emerytury z tytułu osiągnięcia 30 lat wysługi emerytalnej. Omówiono zatem przesłankę umożliwiającą zastosowanie tej podstawy zwolnienia ze służby. Decyzja w tym zakresie ma jednak charakter uznaniowy. Wymaga zatem uwzględnienia zarówno interesu społecznego, jak i słusznego interesu strony. Wskazano wobec tego na granicę uznania administracyjnego uzasadniającego podjęcie decyzji o zwolnieniu na tej podstawie prawnej.
EN
The judgment commented on here concerned the issue connected with the period for filing an appeal. The view was shared that the period for lodging an appeal begins on the day on which the administrative decision is served upon the party (com- municated orally to the party) and it is at this moment that the period commences, although the day on which an administrative decision is served is not counted when calculating this time limit. Therefore, on the very day on which an adminis- trative decision is served, the party may submit an appeal against it, an application to reconsider the matter or waive the right of appeal. An appeal, an application    to reconsider the matter or a statement on waiving the right of appeal are legally effective, because they are submitted during period for the filing an appeal. not content of Art. 57 (1) of The Code of Administrative Proceedings, which regulates the way of calculating the time limit in days. Given the content of this provision, it cannot be assumed that the period for lodging an appeal commences on the day following the one on which the administrative decision is served.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.