Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The object of the article is to present the stance of Germany on the issue of transformations within the euro area proposed by France and the European Commission in the period from the presidential election in France (which ended on May 7, 2017) to the summit of the European Commission (March 22-23, 2018). The authors analyze the reaction of the representatives of the FRG government to proposals of reforms of the euro area in the above mentioned period, with a focus on the four most frequently debated issues: creation of a separate budget of the euro area or a special budget line dedicated to the euro area as a part of the general budget of the European Union, transformation of the European Stability Mechanism into a European Monetary Fund, the completion of a banking union, and the creation of the office of a euro area finance minister or an EU economy and finance minister. A hypothesis was adopted that the government of the FRG in its reactions to those proposals upheld the postulates presented in previous years concerning the necessity of respecting budget discipline and introducing structural reforms in the countries of the euro area, at the same time expressing skepticism toward risk sharing across members of the euro area through, among others, a European deposit insurance scheme. It was also assumed that Germany pursued the adoption of solutions which would prevent the possibility of increasing divisions between member states. The source base of the study consists of official documents of the German government and the European Commission as well as public utterances of the main political actors responsible 83-95for shaping the economic and financial policy at national state level and the EU level.
PL
W artykule dzielnica traktowana jest jako przestrzeń społeczna, która dziś funkcjonuje w obrębie dużego miasta, niegdyś zaś znajdowała się poza nim jako w pewnym stopniu odrębna i autonomiczna całość: wioska, obszar podmiejski, osobne osiedle czy małe miasto leżące przy większym ośrodku. W nawiązaniu do genezy miast, w tekście omówione są wybrane elementy tożsamości dzielnic miejskich. Następnie przedstawia się różne, charakterystyczne dla wybranych szkół w socjologii miasta, sposoby rozumienia i opisywania dzielnicy. Pośród wielu możliwych perspektyw Autorzy za szczególnie przydatną uważają tę, którą nazwać można ujęciem tożsamościowym. Tradycję badań w tym nurcie rozpoczął w Poznaniu Florian Znaniecki, a ich specyficzną cechą jest zwrócenie uwagi na autostereotyp mieszkańców danej przestrzeni oraz na badanie tego autostereotypu w kontekście innych tożsamości (np. narodowych, klasowych, religijnych). Na przykładzie poznańskich dzielnic, takich jak Śródka, Jeżyce, Święty Marcin czy Wilda, w tekście mówi się o zjawiskach kształtujących współcześnie tożsamości dzielnic w mieście.
EN
In the article the district of a city is treated as a social space, which operates today within a big city, and which was once beyond its certain extent as a separate and autonomous being: as a village, a suburban area, a separate estate or a small town situated near a bigger city. With reference to the genesis of cities, the text describes the selected elements of urban districts’ identity. Afterwards, with reference to selected urban sociology schools, different ways of understanding and describing the district are presented. Among the many possible perspectives, Authors consider particularly useful the one which may be called the identity approach. The tradition of conducting research in this trend was started in Poznan by Florian Znaniecki, and their characteristic is to draw attention to the autostereotype of residents living in a given place and study of this autostereotype in the context of other identities (eg. national, class, religious). Using the example of Poznan districts such as Śródka, Jeżyce, Św. Marcin or Wilda, the text speaks of the phenomena that form the modern identity of city’s districts.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.