Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 8

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Slavica Slovaca
|
2007
|
vol. 42
|
issue 2
152-162
EN
In the first part, general theoretical principles of Cucko's book are analyzed and the author of the present paper states the latter represents the fundamental work of the Slavic diachronic onomastic research. In the second part, the author tries to suggest how to step beyond the actual anthroponymy now existing in Transcarpathian Ukraine toward an earlier anthroponymic system by means of the onomastic theory that has recently been developed in the Slovak onomastics.
Slavica Slovaca
|
2006
|
vol. 41
|
issue 2
97-104
EN
Stur's grammatical work is here evaluated 1) in respect to the earlier grammatical studies, 2) in respect to the contemporary linguistics, 3) as an important link in the chain of the development of the Slovak linguistic research. Even if his work partly continues the earlier Slovak grammatical tradition, its conception surpasses it, as it already exhibits marks of the then pullulating diachronic comparative linguistics. The focus of Stur's work lies in the codification of the standard Slovak language. It is the fundament sustaining the following development of the language.
Slavica Slovaca
|
2004
|
vol. 39
|
issue 2
163-165
EN
The dictionary of Old-Lusatian types of local names is an essential component of the series of the forthcoming atlases which is part of the research project on the Slavonic onomastic atlas. The dictionary represents a substantial contribution to the knowledge of Old-Lusatian structural types of local names providing us with important data for comparative Slavonic onomastics.
Slavica Slovaca
|
2008
|
vol. 43
|
issue 2
108-117
EN
Slovak Onomastics in International Context. The Slovak onomastics is distinguished by several characteristic traits: it takes active part in the development of onomastic theory; it attempts to merge theory and practice in heuristic tasks and in onymic analyses; real-life onymy as used in communication and onymic phenomena as represented within a system are considered as two sides of the same coin. All these characteristics are included in the designation Slovak Onomastic School.
EN
If we want to look at the work of the first codifier of literary Slovak it is necessary to pursue how the conception of Bernolak's prescriptive codification was created. Bernolak's attitude to foreign specialized literature (Schlögel, Dolezal, Rosa) deserves special attention. The problem was in the past given quite a lot of attention, but new research puts this question into a different light. Using of foreign sources in Bernolak's literary work usually represents more complicated process which can't be separated from creative author's participation. The whole work of Anton Bernolak can be evaluated as an individual text connected to contemporary specialized literature, which, nevertheless, was filtered by Bernolak's creative approach.
Slavica Slovaca
|
2006
|
vol. 41
|
issue 1
69-71
EN
The author deals with the ethics of scholarly debate and he refutes the manner of the argumentation applied by Lubomir Durovic in oral and written performance. In the discussion concerned with adaptation of foreign names, as e.g. in his article published in Slovenská rec (2005, vol. 5), arguments are displaced by half-truths and offensive statements exceeding the norms of any usual discussion. In this way, the necessary cooperative ambience is being disturbed.
EN
Contemporary onomastics made progress in interpretation of proper nouns, especially in conception of proper name that is viewed semiotically as a linguistic sign sui generis. Proper noun represents relevant onymic system. Study of onymic sign content enables more exact placing of ethnonyms (folk-names) and nouns denoting persons according to their place of abode into transitory area between common noun and proper noun (close to common noun). Stur's conception of proper noun as a separate thing of a certain class is significant for analysis of this lexical layer. In the contrary to antic tradition of the period, Benolak and Stur took into consideration also place of the folk-names and names denoting persons according to their place of abode. Conclusions of their considerations are not identical, but the fact, that both of them explained this question in relation particular - general (common noun), not particular - individual (proper noun), is motivating.
Onomastica
|
2005
|
vol. 50
67-83
EN
The complexity of the proper noun appears in defining individual objects from the viewpoint of two aspects of the onymic sign. At issue here are both its linguistic construction as well as its orthography understood in the normative-administrative sense. Very important for understanding the essence of the onymic sign is indication of the realization of semantic characteristics in the linguistic sphere. It is noted that the proper noun comprises a two-element sui generis linguistic sign, and at the same time is incorporated as a real element of the language into the specific category of names. Proper names form open sets of lexical elements of a given language, but belong also to specific onymic subsystems governed by their own rules. Numerous onymic characteristics differentiate the construction of personal names formed from appellatives to a significantly greater degree than occurs in the case of other onomastic categories. For onomastic researchers there is fundamental significance to the statement that this phenomenon reveals the double status of the proper noun - linguistic and onomastic.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.