Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In the second part of his paper (the first part was published in the 2011 issue of Yearbook of Dogmatic Theology), Massimo Serretti, an Italian theologian and personalist, shows that the parallel use of two terms, nature and person, is fundamental for the development of anthropology. The history of philosophical thought has proved that the gradual separation of those two categories has led to the rejection of the very notion of human nature, diminishing the value of the concept of human itself, understood materialistically and biologically. In the first part of his paper, Serretti concluded that the origin of the contemporary anthropological personalism is to be found in the Trinitarian doctrine.
EN
In the first part of the article the Italian theologian and philosopher Massimo Serretti presents the stages of formation of two concepts: person and nature, the stages of connecting them, and the stages when they appeared separately. On the example of the presented history of thought the author shows that separating the concept of nature from the concept of person has caused, among others, separating anthropology from personology, and in this way has influenced the view of man and the differentiated ethical approach to man as part of nature and as a being transcending nature thanks to the power of spirit. The author of the article proves that for Christian thought based on Revelation anthropology is personology, as the nature of man is not similar to anything in the world of nature; it only has counterparts in the world of Divine persons.
EN
The author shows that in the contemporary crisis of Christianity fits crisis of questioning his “claim to the truth.” Skepticism about the truth that bringing Christianity is supported by the achievements of modern science, which intends to overcome thinking about the existence of man and his relationship to God. To contribute two more factors: critical exegesis and critique of classical metaphysics. In the context of these risks, the Author attempts to read the explanatory signs of the times, pointing to the issue of religious truth through the prism of the uniqueness and universality of Jesus Christ. The position to be adopted in relation to truth, Author believes for crucial, because it gives rise to this, to talk about the true religion. In this way he desires to make a challenge for Christian thought associated with the current growth and spread of religious movements.
PL
Autor pragnie wykazać, że we współczesny kryzys chrześcijaństwa wpisuje się kryzys związany z kwestionowaniem jego roszczenia do prawdy. Sceptycyzm wobec prawdy, którą niesie chrześcijaństwo, jest wspierany przez osiągnięcia współczesnej nauki, która zamierza przezwyciężyć dotychczasowe myślenie na temat egzystencji człowieka i jego relacji do Boga. Do tego przyczyniają się jeszcze dwa czynniki, jakimi są: krytyczna egzegeza oraz krytyka klasycznej metafizyki. W kontekście wymienionych zagrożeń, Autor podejmuje próbę wyjaśniającego odczytywania znaków czasu, wskazując na kwestię prawdy religijnej przez pryzmat wyjątkowości i powszechności Jezusa Chrystusa. Stanowisko, które przyjmuje Autor w odniesieniu do prawdy, uważa za decydujące, ponieważ daje ono podstawę do tego, aby mówić o prawdziwej religii. W ten sposób pragnie sformułować wyzwanie dla myśli chrześcijańskiej związane z obecnym wzrostem i rozprzestrzenianiem się ruchów religijnych.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.