Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 4 Biuletyn Edukacji Medialnej

Authors help

  1. 4 Wyrostkiewicz M.

Years help

  1. 2 2014

  2. 2 2013

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

[spr] Infoetyka na IX Lubelskim Festiwalu Nauki

100%
Wyrostkiewicz M.
Biuletyn Edukacji Medialnej
|
2013
|
issue 1
120-122
EN
Five projects at IX Lublin Science Festival (15-21 September 2012) related to media and communications. These activities are focused on the use social media, plagiarism, violence in the media, manipulation of the media.
2

Lying and Communication – Lying as an Anti-Communicative Act

100%
Wyrostkiewicz M.
Biuletyn Edukacji Medialnej
|
2014
|
issue 1
44-54
EN
A lie is incompatible with the objective state of affairs, meaning that it is an assertion divergent from the truth. It is an act of deliberately bringing someone into error; at its core is the offender’s free decision to express thoughts contrary to his own conviction on a given matter – the liar in fact says what is untrue not because he does not know the truth, but because someone to whom he transmits this message will accept as truth what is not. And he does so with the knowledge and intention of convincing someone that he knows the truth. However a lie is considered by some to be an ordinary means of communication, we can conclude that this is not so. There is no doubt that lying is an example of some kind of anti-communication. It is in fact an action which on the surface resembles an act of communication. Due to its nature, which is not to build up a community, but the realization of self-serving, unauthorized purposes, it does not deserve to be called a communicative action.
3

Manipulation and Communication – Manipulation as an Anti‑Communicative Act

100%
Wyrostkiewicz M.
Biuletyn Edukacji Medialnej
|
2014
|
issue 2
21-32
EN
Oftentimes, it is believed that the manipulation is one of the activities involved in communication. It is not simply one among many competencies, but a kind of art; it is something one should learn in order to make remarkable achievements that will bring real benefits. However, in the humanities, philosophy and theology, the way of looking at manipulation is somewhat different. We must remember that it still means “a skillful hand grip”, we have to be aware that here we mean another person hold something. In other words, “to manipulate someone” is “to have something in one’s hand”, to have power over something, to treat something as an object, and to use something for one’s own needs. More specifically, manipulation is defined as the intentional, biased and secretive operation in to dictate to some man or group of people a false picture of reality in order to achieve their personal benefits; it is using people to achieve their own goals (according to the used neighbor). It is shaping the opinions and attitudes and directing behavior and human emotions, not only without a person’s consent, but also without their knowledge (in this sense, manipulation very clearly differs from formation, education and persuasion, which will be discussed later). However, we cannot be under the illusion that caring for our needs is always an action against another person, and demanding the implementation of legitimate needs is manipulation. Every person has the right to pursue their own legitimate needs. Of course, the limit that cannot be exceed is respect for the interlocutor. These reflections do not leave any doubt as to the fact that manipulation is seen as an unnatural (non-ecological) reality, and thus harmful to the human person. It is an evil that destroys a manipulated person as well as the manipulator and negatively affects the social order, impeding its proper maintenance. While the manipulator does not actually lie, a liar’s mentality and that of a manipulator’s are similar. They merely use different tools to obtain their undeserved and selfish interests. Both the manipulator and the manipulated person are responsible for the evil that appears in the world as a result of manipulation. The manipulated committed a mistake by showing too little concern for the truth and not sufficiently using their reason, allowing the manipulator to directly lead them into error. Manipulation cannot be considered to be communication. It is in fact a reality (action) that apparently resembles an act of communication. Due to its nature, meaning that it does not build the community (which belongs to the essence of communication), but is the achievement of self-serving purposes, it appears to be the action of anit-communication.
4

[rec] Capire i new media. Culture, comunicazione, innovazione tecnologica e istituzioni sociali, a cura di Leah A. Lievrouw, Sonia Livingstone, edizione italiana a cura di Giovanni Boccia Artieri, Luciano Paccagnella, Francesca Pasquali, Editore Urlico Hoepli, Milano 2011, pp. 415

100%
Wyrostkiewicz M.
Biuletyn Edukacji Medialnej
|
2013
|
issue 1
118-119
EN
The book is a handbook of communictaion and new media for students and researchers. It is a collection of 14 articles that discuss this topic from the point of view of different scientific fields. The strong point of the book is the extensive bibliography.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.