Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Innowacje w płatnościach elektronicznych – tendencje rozwojowe

100%
Szpringer W., Szpringer M.
Problemy Zarządzania
|
2015
|
issue 3/2015 (54), t.1
11-28
EN
The aim of this study is to investigate the development trends of innovation in the market for electronic payments and related challenges for regulation. A key aspect of the regulation of payment systems is the ability to foster innovative solutions created by new technologies and introduce them in the sphere of payment services, taking into consideration efficiency and security. Innovative payment services are services based on new approaches, new technologies and new standards that improve in a substantial, qualitative way the current methods of payments. There are three areas of innovation in the field of retail payments: innovative payment instruments, innovative channels and payment methods, innovative forms of money.
PL
Celem opracowania jest zbadanie tendencji rozwojowych innowacji na rynku płatności elektronicznych i związanych z nimi wyzwań dla regulacji. Kluczowy aspekt regulacji systemów płatności to zdolność wspierania innowacyjnych rozwiązań, które niosą ze sobą nowe technologie, oraz ich wprowadzania w sferze usług płatniczych z równoczesnym zapewnieniem efektywności i bezpieczeństwa. Innowacyjne usługi płatnicze to usługi, w których zostały wprowadzone nowe rozwiązania, technologie lub standardy zmieniające w istotny, jakościowy sposób dotychczasowe metody dokonywania płatności. Można wskazać trzy obszary innowacji w dziedzinie płatności detalicznych: innowacyjne instrumenty płatnicze, innowacyjne kanały i sposoby dokonywania płatności, innowacyjne formy pieniądza.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The European system of financial supervision – regulatory impact assessment

100%
Szpringer M., Szpringer W.
Journal of Banking and Financial Economics
|
2017
|
issue 2(8)
84–104
EN
Complexity and uncertainty in the application of the regulations of the European system of financial supervision are due to the fact that its particular elements were implemented over a period of time. First, it was a system of European financial supervision authorities i.e. the European Banking Authority (EBA), the European Insurance and the Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), whose main objective was to coordinate national actions. Then there were established the European Banking Union, including the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM), as well as the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), which constitutes also a part of the system of support for endangered banks. Legal interpretation problems are a result of differences in the scope of competences of these entities. For example, there is uncertainty whether the regulations refer to the eurozone or the whole European Union and if they refer to banks only or to other financial institutions as well. An analysis of the SSM, the SRM or the ESM does not always offer a clear answer to questions such as: who, when and using what tools should act; when, for example, the ECB may and should correct the decisions of national supervisors; what is the role of the ESRB, if we take account of the enhanced competences of the ECB in the banking union; if and when banks may question supervisory decisions concerning, for example, establishing a buffer or classifying an institution as SIFI, etc. Similarly, the role of the EBA or the ESM is unclear in the context of the establishment of the banking union, the SSM, the SRM, the ESM and the delegation of power of the ECB and the European Commission to regulatory agencies (Meroni doctrine) or the practice of establishing regulatory agencies outside the bounds of the treaty (Pringle doctrine). Therefore the regulatory landscape in this context requires impact assessment.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.