Search results

1

Kontrowersje interpretacyjne wypowiedzi typu „Nie sądzę, że p, ja to wiem.”

100%

Ziembicki D.

Polonica

|

2018

|

vol. 38

232-244

EN

The subject of the paper are such types of utterances as Nie sądzę, że p, ja to wiem (I don t believe that p, I know it). In particular, interpretive controversies of this kind of utterances are discussed. The applied research method consists in a comparative analysis of the collected language material. Moreover, the present-ed extensive empirical material confirms the thesis that such utterances are indeed corrective. The conclu-sions from the analyses support the thesis that the classical definition of knowledge (of justified true belief) is internally contradictory due to the fact that verb wiedzieć, że_ (know that_) is defined by a non-factive verb być przekonanym, że_ (be convinced that_).

2

Pytania rozstrzygnięcia z udziałem czasowników epistemicznych. Co wynika z ich użycia?

100%

Ziembicki D.

Poradnik Językowy

|

2017

|

vol. 748

|

issue 9

76-91

EN

The object of the research is utterances used at the same time to express an epistemic attitude towards the state of affairs refl ected in propositional object and to receive an answer from the interlocutor, for instance: Chyba nie sądzisz, że Anna nadaje się na to stanowisko!? (You can’t think Anna is suitable for the position, can you!?). The author intends to determine how factive and non-factive verbs behave in such structures. Three groups of expressions were analysed in the fi rst place: epistemic, speech and discovery verbs. The applied research method consisted in a comparative analysis of the collected language material. Clear syntactic, semantic and pragmatic differences between the structures with the use of factive and non-factive verbs were noticed.

3

On Conversational Implicatures in Questions

63%

Puczyłowski T., Ziembicki D.

Filozofia Nauki

|

2018

|

vol. 26

|

issue 1

23-48

PL

This article explores the connection between questions and conversational implicatures. We put forward a theoretical argument to the effect that questions can contain such implicatures. We also present extensive empirical material that confirms this hypothesis. The article focuses on a class of utterances used simultaneously to express an epistemic stance toward a state of affairs stated in a subordinate clause and to receive a response from an interlocutor, like in the following example: Don’t you think Peter should be going home now?

Refine search results

1 Filozofia Nauki

1 Polonica

1 Poradnik Językowy

3 Ziembicki D.

1 Puczyłowski T.

2 2018

1 2017

Kontrowersje interpretacyjne wypowiedzi typu „Nie sądzę, że p, ja to wiem.”

Pytania rozstrzygnięcia z udziałem czasowników epistemicznych. Co wynika z ich użycia?

On Conversational Implicatures in Questions