Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
Podstawowym celem tekstu jest prezentacja i próba klasyfikacji dorobku socjologii muzyki w Polsce na tle socjologii. Ponadto tekst ma na celu przyjrzenie się prawidłowościom jej rozwoju oraz podjęcie próby wyjaśnienia przyczyn aktualnego stanu rzeczy. Omówione zostały zastane w literaturze diagnozy kondycji socjologii muzyki, kontakty i obecność międzynarodowa badaczy, ich więzi i platformy dyskusji oraz prowadzenie dydaktyki. Informacje zawarte w niniejszym tekście są efektem ponad dwuletnich badań, na które złożyły się pogłębione kwerendy biblioteczne, analizy zebranych tekstów oraz seria wywiadów z badaczami. Do podsumowania sytuacji socjologii muzyki w Polsce wykorzystano krążeniowy model B. Latoura.
EN
First aim of a text is to present the state of sociology of music in Poland in the context of development of sociology in Poland. Second, is to interpret it in sociological terms and attempt to explain mentioned underdevelopment’s reasons. The text is summary of library queries, publication analysis and conducted by the author interviews with 25 researchers. There has been applied a model of idea circulation in science from Bruno Latour’s work to review and explain the situation of sociology of music in Poland.
EN
According to Harry Lehmann the philosophy of music as an academic field of study appears when musical complexity needs deeper philosophical interpretation and then disappears. Similar opinion has been a part of theoretical work of Aleksander Lipski about the rise of sociology of art in 20th century. Th at is why the digital revolution in the art of sounds can and should be studied in a sociological way. Lehmann sees this need but does not take this opportunity as a philosopher to fulfill it. However, he uses sociological terminology like: democratization or deinstitutionalisation. This article gives succor to the problem. It focuses on projecting empirical research which can be used to verify the speculative (or philosophical) character of Lehmann’s work.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.