Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 8

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Kobiece oblicze wyborów parlamentarnych w Polsce. Pomiędzy przeszłością a teraźniejszością

100%
Lis-Staranowicz D.
Studia Wyborcze
|
2018
|
vol. 25
31-44
PL
Artykuł ma charakter przeglądowy, ponieważ zawiera zbiorcze zestawienie wyników osiągniętych przez kobiety w wyborach do Sejmu i Senatu w latach 1919–2015. Jego celem jest przypomnienie starań kobiet o przyznanie im praw wyborczych, sylwetek pierwszych polskich parlamentarzystek i drogi do zwiększenia partycypacji obywatelek w sprawowaniu władzy. Artykuł odnosi się także do efektów działania kwot wyborczych, wprowadzonych kodeksem wyborczym. Przedstawia również wyniki wyborów do Sejmu z 2015 roku na tle innych krajów, które wraz z Polską weszły na drogę transformacji ustrojowej.
EN
The article has a review character because it contains a summary list of womenʼs results achieved in the Sejm and Senate elections during the period of 1919–2015. Its aim is to recall women’s efforts to grant them electoral rights, the profiles of the first Polish parliamentarians and the way to increase the participation of female citizens in the exercise of power. The article also refers to the effects of the election quotas introduced by the Electoral Code. It also presents the results of the elections to the Sejm in 2015 in comparison to other countries, which together with Poland entered the path of political transformation.
2
Content available remote

Posiadanie gospodarstwa przez małżonków a wpis do ewidencji producentów rolnych. Studium jednego przypadku

100%
Lis-Staranowicz D.
Studia Warmińskie
|
2015
|
issue 52
241-255
PL
Na podstawie art. 12 ustawy o krajowym systemie ewidencji producentów, ewidencji gospodarstw rolnych oraz ewidencji wniosków o przyznanie płatności rolnicy, pozostający w związkach małżeńskich, ale prowadzący dwa odrębne gospodarstwa (np. rozdzielność majątkowa), nie mogli ubiegać się osobno o dopłaty, co ograniczało ich samodzielność ekonomiczną. Problem ten nabierał szczególnego znaczenia w sytuacji pozostawania przez małżonków-rolników w separacji. Mimo sygnalizowanych problemów, ustawodawca nie dokonał nowelizacji ustawy o systemie ewidencji producentów rolnych. Dopiero wyrok Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z 3 grudnia 2013 r. (sygn. akt P 40/12) otworzył drogę rolnikom-małżonkom do odrębnego umieszczenia ich w ewidencji producentów rolnych i samodzielnego ubiegania się o dopłaty.
EN
On the basis of Act of the national register of producers, the record of farms and records of claims for payment, farmers, being in the matrimony and running farms on your own account (eg. separate property) were not able to autonomously apply for the area payment. Such situation limited their economic independence. This problem took on special meaning when spouses-farmers were on the legal separation. Despite the identified problems, the legislature did not introduced amendments in the Act. It was not until the Constitutional Court's judgment of 3 December 2013. (Ref. P 40/12 P) gave farmers-spouses all the clear to place them separately in the register of agricultural producers and independently apply for area payments.
DE
Auf der Grundlage des Art. 12 des Gesetzes über das nationale Anmeldesystem der Hersteller, das Register landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe und über das Register der Zahlungsanträge, Landwirte, die verheiratet bleiben aber gleichzeitig zwei separate Bauernhöfe führen (z. B. separates Eigentum ), könnten bis vor kurzem, separat leider keine Subventionen beantragen. Dadurch wurde auch ihre ökonomische Unabhängigkeit stark begrenzt. Trotz der festgestellten Probleme, hat der Gesetzgeber keine Änderungen im Gesetz über das Register der landwirtschaftlichen Produzenten eingeführt. Erst das Urteil des Verfassungsgerichtes vom 3. Dezember 2013 (AZ P 40/12) hat dazu geführt, dass Landwirte-Ehepartner, können getrennt in das Register der landwirtschaftlichen Produzenten eingetragen werden und auch unabhängige Beantragung für Subventionen machen.
3
Content available remote

Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z 19 czerwca 2018 r. (sygn. akt SK 19/17)

100%
Lis-Staranowicz D.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2019
|
issue 3(152)
151–158
EN
The commented judgment concerned the disclosure of disability symbol on the disability certificate. The complainant, both in the constitutional complaint and during the proceedings, claimed the symbol 02-P (mental illnesses) was stigmatising. Although the Constitutional Tribunal decided on non-constitutionality of the challenged provisions, the commented judgment caused the further stigmatisation of persons with mental illnesses. Organs still placed other symbols on the disability certificate, as they did not lose competences in this scope, and all symbols (specified in the challenged regulation) maintained their force, with the exception of 02-P. In practice, every certificate included the cause of disability. In case of persons like the complainant, the information on the cause of disability had a negative character, as the lack of a symbol was also an information on the state of health. The judgment shall therefore be evaluated negatively.
4
Content available remote

Parlamentaryzm europejski Ryszard M. Małajny Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, Warszawa 2019, s. 780

100%
Lis-Staranowicz D.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2020
|
issue 4(159)
237-249
EN
The book European Parliamentarism is an exceptional work because the author conducts a multi-faceted discourse, analyzing the institution referred to in the title from the perspective of the history of political and legal doctrines, constitutional law, political science, experiences of Poland, Germany, Great Britain, France and other European countries. The author takes the reader on a ride not only through decades, but also through the years of the development of the parliamentary system in Europe, its strengthening and transformation. In view of the rich content of the book, the review discusses the issue of the relationship between the Council of Ministers and the Sejm, presented from the perspective of R.M. Małajny, who observes the political scene and analyzes constitutional solutions implemented in Poland. Based on that relationship the author believes that the Council of Ministers plays the lead role among the constitutional bodies of the state, although it has no democratic authority thereto. Constitutional powers of the Sejm, which is the representative body of the nation, do not allow for the expression of the opinion „on its preponderance in the system of authorities of the Republic of Poland”.
5
Content available remote

Wtórna niekonstytucyjność przepisów ustawowych w orzecznictwie sądów administracyjnych

63%
Lis-Staranowicz D., Kopacz M.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2022
|
issue 6(173)
115–135
EN
The defect of secondary unconstitutionality of the law (manifest unconstitutionality) is an issue growing out of judicial practice, and its determination is a multi-stage process. In this process, the judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal performs the function of a predicate ruling (prejudykat) for the court, for which it is binding not only in the operative part of the judgement, but also in the justification. This is of particular importance for the determination of manifest unconstitutionality. What is important is not the wording of the provision affected by the defect in question, but its meaning, normative environment, purpose and legal effect. The linguistic concurrence of the juxtaposed provisions argues for secondary unconstitutionality. It is, however, a prerequisite, but not a sufficient condition for its determination by the court.
6
Content available remote

Glosa do Wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 23 listopada 2022 r., sygn. akt SK 113/20

63%
Lis-Staranowicz D., Miaskowska-Daszkiewicz K.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2023
|
issue 5(178)
185–199
EN
The commented judgement was issued in a case initiated by a constitutional complaint and concerns the right to possess arms. However, this entitlement is not the crux of the constitutional problem. It is only the background to the main issue, which is the right to good administration. In its judgement of 23 November 2022, ref. no. SK 113/20, the Constitutional Tribunal confirmed that Article 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland guarantees everyone the right to good administration, which is a subjective right and is fully enforceable by means of a constitutional complaint. According to the Constitutional Tribunal, the right to good administration is procedural in nature and is equivalent to the right to a fair trial. The administrative procedure, and in particular the legal rules governing them, must guarantee the party concerned: a) a full and thorough examination of the circumstances relevant to the resolution of the case; b) the right to be heard, i.e. the right to present and defend one’s arguments; c) the examination of the case within a reasonable period of time; d) justification of the decisions taken by the public authorities; e) the right to appeal against the decisions taken at first instance (judgement SK 113/20).
7
Content available remote

EUROPEANIZATION OF POLISH CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (O zjawisku europeizacji polskiego prawa konstytucyjnego)

63%
Lis-Staranowicz D., Galster J.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2010
|
issue 2(97)
29-51
EN
Europeanization of law is the consequence of influence of European integration on the domestic legal system of countries aspiring to EU membership. The constitution is not free from this influence. To put it more simply, Europeanization of the constitution means constitutionalization of matters either related (even if in a different way) to European Union law ('a sensu stricto' Europeanization) or generally connected with law enacted by European international organizations ('a sensu largo' Europeanization). Constitutional transformation resulting from the EU accession is mostly reflected in the organizational structure of the state. In Poland, the consequence of delegation of some powers of state authorities to the European Community/European Union (under Article 90 of the Constitution) means the extension of the state activity to the European level. This function of the state does not correspond with the classical separation of powers doctrine. The exercise of this function only by the Council of Ministers threatens the balance of powers guaranteed by Article 10 of the Constitution. There is, above all, a need for involvement of the representative bodies of the Nation in the exercise of this function. Therefore, an amendment to the constitution should be considered that would specify the principles of cooperation in European affairs between the Council of Ministers, the Sejm and the Senate, and the president of the Republic. Europeanization of the constitution does not always have positive effect on its 'improvement'. It may lead to 'erosion' of constitutional standards: disavowal of the principles of the system of government, the weakening of the regulatory function of the state. The absence of constitutionalization of the 'progress in integration' exposes the legal system to criticism for being contradictory and lacking completeness. The scope of Europeanization should be limited by the so-called identity of the constitution, i.e. a relative immutability of fundamental constitutional principles and values. When proclaiming an 'integration option', their authors have not identified those categories which determine the substance of the basic law.
8
Content available remote

Zakres podmiotowy prawa do petycji w Polsce i w Unii Europejskiej. Przyczynek do dyskusji

63%
Galster J., Lis-Staranowicz D.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2018
|
issue 3(146)
59–77
EN
The purpose of the article is not to comprehensively analyse the right of petition, but to expose its addressees. The issue is not solely of theoretical nature, as it results from problems which have arisen in the practice of applying the right. The authors pose the question on the ability of the organs of public administration and public legal persons to submit petitions in view of both Polish and European Union legislation.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.