Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 7

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Status cech Wielkiej Piątki: czy tylko endogenne tendencje zachowania?

100%
Zawadzki B.
Roczniki Psychologiczne
|
2008
|
vol. 11
|
issue 1
163-171
2

Temperament, poznawcza regulacja stanów afektywnych oraz poziom nastroju w zaburzeniu stresowym pourazowym (PTSD)

84%
Barańczuk U., Zawadzki B.
Psychologia-Etologia-Genetyka
|
2013
|
vol. 28
97-114
EN
The aim of the study was an analysis of the influence of temperamental traits, cognitive affect regulation strategies and intensity of posttraumatic symptoms disorder (PTSD) on the mood level in the group of 250 subjects (152 females and 98 males), who were exposed in life at least to one traumatic event. The study assessed concurrent relationships and based on self-report measures. The results showed that temperamental traits influence active strategies of affect-regulation and positive mood. On the other side the impact of symptoms of PTSD on avoidance strategies of affect-regulation and negative mood was recorded.
3
Content available remote

O (nie)trafności Ogólnego Czynnika Osobowości (GFP)

84%
Zawadzki B., Strelau J.
Roczniki Psychologiczne
|
2014
|
vol. 17
|
issue 2
259-290
PL
W pracy podjęto problem trafności Ogólnego Czynnika Osobowości (General Factor of Personality, GFP). Analiza bazowała na danych zebranych ogółem w grupie 1906 osób (878 kobiet i 1028 mężczyzn w wieku 18-66 lat). GFP wyodrębniono na podstawie wyników badania kwestionariuszem NEO-FFI, zaś wyniki skal badających cechy Pięcioczynnikowego Modelu Osobowości (PMO) oraz czynnika GFP odniesiono do 15 wybranych zmiennych kryterialnych: nasilenia objawów PTSD, uogólnionego poczucia własnej skuteczności, objawów osobowości schizotypowej, stylów zachowania w konflikcie (konsens, unikanie, dominacja, uleganie i kompromis) oraz behawioralnych czynników ryzyka chorób somatycznych (choroby wieńcowej i nowotworowej): Typu A, Typu 1, Typu 2 i Typu 4 osobowości oraz depresyjności, uległości i wrogości. Uzyskane wyniki wskazały na słabość pomiaru GFP (niska rzetelność, nieadekwatne dopasowanie modelu jednoczynnikowego do struktury skal NEO-FFI) oraz dużą zmienność trafności GFP. Analiza porównawcza zmiennych kryterialnych, dla których zarówno GFP, jak i skale PMO charakteryzowała wysoka trafność z przypadkami zmiennych wykazujących niską trafność czynnika GFP przy wysokiej trafności skal źródłowych, pozwoliła na zidentyfikowanie przyczyn zróżnicowania trafności GFP. Wynika ona z niskiego skorelowania skal PMO, skutkującego odmiennością wzorca interkorelacji skal od wzorca ich skorelowania ze zmiennymi kryterialnymi. W dyskusji wskazano na ograniczony sens teoretyczny i empiryczny czynnika GFP, zasadniczo odmienny od stosowanego w badaniach nad inteligencją czynnika ogólnego g, generowanego z testów zdolności czy nawet skal osobowości, które są agregatami wysokoskorelowanych cech niższego rzędu
EN
The paper presents research on the validity of the General Factor of Personality (GFP), extracted on the basis of NEO-FFI scores. Analysis was based on data obtained in four groups consisting, in total, of 1906 participants (878 women and 1028 men aged from 18 to 66 years). Scores on Five-Factor Model (FFM) scales and GFP scores were analyzed against 15 selected criterion variables: the intensity of PTSD symptoms, schizotypal personality symptoms, general self-efficacy, conflict management styles (integrating, dominating, avoiding, compromising, obliging), and behavioral risk factors of somatic diseases (CND and cancer): Type A, Type 1, Type 2, and Type 4 personality as well as depressiveness, hostility, and submissiveness. The results indicated the structural weakness of the GFP (low reliability, unacceptable fit of the one-factor model to the structure of NEO-FFI scales) and a high diversity of GFP validity. Comparative analysis of criterion variables for which both FFM and GFP scores had high validity with cases of variables showing high validity of FFM scores and low validity of the GFP allowed to identify the causes of the diversity of GFP validity. It is a result of low intercorrelations among FFM scales, which frequently creates differences between the pattern of intercorrelations of FFM scales and the pattern of their correlations with criterion variables. In the discussion the limited theoretical and empirical meaning of the GFP was underlined, especially when compared to the general g factor, used in research on intelligence, extracted from highly intercorrelated ability tests or even personality scales, which are based on highly correlated lower level subdimensions.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Post-traumatic disorders as a consequence of the disaster

84%
Zawadzki B., Strelau J.
Nauka
|
2008
|
issue 2
EN
The paper discusses the post-traumatic disorders as the consequence of disaster, their course and determinants. As an illustration, the summary of the results of the Polish studies on flood survivors, conducted in 1999-2007, was presented. The studies were focused on the identification of risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), assessed in several groups of victims in the early (about three months) and late phase (from one to years) after the flood. The findings indicate that PTSD is a multi-causal phenomenon with many risk factors, preceding the flood and operating during the trauma and in the post-traumatic period, which result in arousing and maintaining in time PTSD symptoms. The main conclusion of Polish studies on flood survivors underlines the eminent role of personality traits, including temperament, as well as within-family factors influencing PTSD.
5

Polska adaptacja Inwentarza Poznawczych Strategii Regulacji Stanów Afektywnych ICARUS

84%
Zawadzki B., Barańczuk U.
Psychologia-Etologia-Genetyka
|
2013
|
vol. 27
87-105
EN
The presented study was focused on assessment of psychometric properties of Polish adaptation of the Inventory of Cognitive Affect Regulation Strategies (ICARUS; originally developed by Barbara Kamholz, Adela Hayes, Charles Carver, Suzy Gulliver and Carola Perlman) in the group of 250 Polish students exposed to traumatic events. Fidelity of translation was established by application of the standard translation procedures, like back-translation, evaluated and commented by the authors on ICARUS, and bilingual retest in the group of students of English philology. Reliability was assessed on the basis of indices of internal consistency and validity by relationships with scales assessing emotions (Inventory of Emotions, developed by Diener, Smith & Fujita) and mood dimensions (PANAS inventory, developed by Watson, Clark & Tellegen) as well as with scales measuring styles of affect regulation (Mood Regulation Scales developed by Wojciszke) and coping with stress (COPE inventory developed by Carver, Scheier & Weintraub). Analyses demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties of Polish translation of ICARUS, comparable with original version.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Memorial note. Professor Jan Strelau (1931–2020)

84%
Brzeziński J. M., Zawadzki B.
Nauka
|
2020
|
issue 4
EN
The paper is dedicated to the memory of Professor Jan Strelau, who passed away in Warsaw 4th of August 2020. Professor Jan Strelau was the most prominent and world-wide recognized Polish psychologist and his scientific contribution was essential for psychology of individual differences and studies on temperament. Paper presents the life and scientific achievements of Professor Jan Strelau.
7

Temperamentalna charakterystyka zaburzeń osobowości

60%
Zawadzki B., Rozmysłowska J., Nowocin D., Popiel A., Pragłowska E.
Psychologia-Etologia-Genetyka
|
2012
|
vol. 25
7-23
EN
The aim of the paper was empirical verification of the relationship between temperamental traits (according to RTT) and personality disorders. Two hypotheses were tested - the possibility of describing the specific profile of temperamental traits for each disorder or identifying the common temperamental characteristics for all personality disorders. The data were obtained in the study of more than 1700 subjects, assessed by self-report measures: TALEIA-400A, PBQ and SCID-II questionnaire for personality disorders, and the FCB-TI for temperamental traits. The results indicate the high similarity of correlational profiles of temperamental traits with all personality disorders, which may be classified into “week” (characterized by the low capacity for stimulation processing - involving Cluster A, C and borderline personality disorder) or “overstimulated” type of temperament (characterized by dysregulation of stimulation supply – Cluster B: antisocial, histrionic and narcissistic personality disorder). Identifying the specific profile of relations of temperamental traits for each of 10 personality disorders (described in DSM IV) was not possible.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.