Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Opposition to a trade mark application in amended Polish law and EU law

100%
Sieńczyło-Chlabicz J.
Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego
|
2021
|
issue 4
2-9
PL
Celem artykułu jest analiza przyjętych przez ustawodawcę rozwiązań prawnych dotyczących postępowania w sprawie sprzeciwu wobec zgłoszenia znaku towarowego w ustawie - Prawo własności przemysłowej i ich porównanie z unijną procedurą sprzeciwową. Poddano ocenie zarówno przepisy prawa materialnego, jak i procesowego dotyczące postępowania sprzeciwowego w prawie znaków towarowych na tle kilku ostatnich nowelizacji ustawy - Prawo własności przemysłowej. Porównano rozwiązania obowiązujące w polskiej ustawie z unijną procedurą sprzeciwu w zakresie takich zagadnień, jak: podmioty legitymowane czynnie do wniesienia sprzeciwu, podstawy sprzeciwu i terminu jego wniesienia, badanie dopuszczalności sprzeciwu, przebieg postępowania sprzeciwowego i tryb rozpoznania sprzeciwu uznanego przez zgłaszającego za bezzasadny. Sformułowano uwagi krytyczne w odniesieniu do niektórych rozwiązań przyjętych przez polskiego ustawodawcę dotyczących m.in.: niekompletnej regulacji postępowania w sprawie sprzeciwu w prawie znaków towarowych; zawężonego kręgu podmiotów legitymowanych do wniesienia sprzeciwu; potrzeby uszczegółowienia treści sprzeciwu; nieuzasadnionego zniesienia rozpoznania sprzeciwu w trybie postępowania spornego. Poczynione rozważania pozwoliły na sformułowanie wniosków de lege ferenda.
EN
A purpose of the article is the analysis of legal solutions concerning opposition proceedings on a trade mark application adopted by the legislator in the Industrial Property Law and their comparison to the Union procedure for opposition. The provisions of both substantive and procedural law on opposition proceedings in trade mark law in relation to several recent amendments of the Industrial Property Law have been assessed herein. The following aspects of legal solutions contained in the Polish Law and the Union procedure for opposition have been compared herein: entities who have standing to file a notice of opposition, grounds and time limits to file a notice of opposition, examination of admissibility of the opposition, a course of opposition proceedings, and the procedure for the examination of the opposition that has been deemed unfounded by the applicant. Furthermore, the article has voiced some criticism against certain solutions adopted by the Polish legislator which refer, among others, to incomplete regulation of opposition proceedings in trade mark law, a narrowed group of entities empowered to file a notice of opposition, a need to make the content of an opposition more precise, and unjustified abolition of the examination of an opposition in the course of adversarial proceedings. The considerations made herein resulted in the formulation of conclusions de lege ferenda.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The Jurisdiction of Administrative Courts and Common Courts in the Industrial Property Cases from a Historical Perspective

100%
Sieńczyło-Chlabicz J.
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
|
2023
|
vol. 22
|
issue 2
103-123
EN
The origins of the administrative court system go back to the period of building of the system of government in the Second Republic after Poland’s partitions and are associated with the establishment of the Supreme Administrative Tribunal (SAT) in 1922. Significant changes were made to the administrative court system by the Polish Constitution of April 2, 1997, which, in Article 175(1), stipulates that administrative courts – in addition to common courts and military courts – administer justice. Administrative courts are therefore a separate part of the judiciary based on a two-instance adjudication system. In this paper, the author presents the origins of the administrative court system, including the Supreme Administrative Tribunal, the Supreme Administrative Court (SAC). The author indicates the models of the administrative court system, its essence, and the role it plays in the justice system. Then she analyzes the jurisdiction of administrative courts in industrial property cases from a historical perspective An interesting issue in this context is the existing dualism of the consideration of industrial property cases by administrative courts and by common courts. An important change that came into effect on July 1, 2020 pursuant to the Act of February 13, 2020 on amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) was the introduction of separate proceedings in the intellectual property cases and the establishment of the so-called IP courts (intellectual property courts), and the impact of these changes on the development of relations in terms of the jurisdiction of administrative courts and common courts.
3

The Principle of Proportionality as a Method of Limiting the Privacy of Public Officials

63%
Sieńczyło-Chlabicz J., Zawadzka Z.
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
|
2013
|
vol. 32
|
issue 1
43-66
EN
It is unquestionable that people performing public functions are entitled to much narrower range of privacy protection than the so-called private persons, because of voluntarily holding a public office, the right of citizens to public information as well as the necessity of preserving transparency and openness of public life. Thus, the principle of proportionality should refer to foremost needs connected with proper functioning of public institutions, and not only to the status of people performing public functions as citizens. How- ever, it is important to underscore that intrusion into privacy of the people of this category should be justified, every time, on grounds of a direct connection between their functioning in the sphere of private life and the function (office) performed for the state and the public good. The issue of reducing privacy of the people performing public functions requires presenting the premises of the principle of proportionality determining the restrictions in exercising the constitutional rights and liberties. The considerations in this paper will allow to analyse the solutions of the Constitutional Tribunal examining the compliance with the Constitution of statutory legal regulations which constitute an intrusion in the right to privacy of people performing public functions in view of their meeting the premises of suitability, necessity and proportionality in the strict sense in reference to the imposed limitations.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Działanie w interesie publicznym jako okoliczność wyłączająca bezprawność naruszenia przez prasę prywatności osób wykonujących działalność publiczną

63%
Sieńczyło-Chlabicz J., Zawadzka Z.
Themis Polska Nova
|
2012
|
issue 1(2)
7-27
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.