Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Kierunki badań nad przywództwem politycznym. Analiza ilościowa na przykładzie polskich publikacji zbiorowych

100%
Hartliński M.
Forum Politologiczne
|
2013
|
vol. 15 - Przywództwo polityczne w Polsce i na świecie
145-176
EN
Polish political scientists have been increasingly interested in political leadership. One may encounter an augmented number of studies concerning this issue. These are monographs as well as team works. Taking the latter into consideration one can identify 15 publications containing 354 articles. The analysis of their content leads to defining 5 main study areas. These study areas are: political leaders (55 articles); political leadership on local level (42); the theory of political leadership (31); political leadership in various countries and regions (19); political leadership (17).
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Formalne determinanty pozycji przywódców w strukturach pozaparlamentarnych partii politycznych w Polsce

100%
Hartliński M.
Prawo i Polityka
|
2015
|
issue 6
40-64
EN
The study is aimed at analysing the statutes of 76 political parties and constitutes an attempt at characterising the formal position of party leaders in the structures of Polish non-parliamentary parties. Formal conditions determining leadership in non-parliamentary parties may be characterised with references to a few issues. Almost all of such parties have either of two formally determined positions of the leader. This is chairman (35) and president (33). In the majority of the parties (44) the position of the leader is an independent body set apart in their organisational structure. In fewer parties, the leader is the head of a collegiate body. Classifying the hierarchy of party bodies, in the greatest number of cases the leader was not set apart (29). If it was done, the leader received the second (20) or the third (14) position. The leader almost always, as a result of the position he occupies, becomes a member of other key bodies in the party. In slightly more than half of the parties (39), the leader has an opportunity to decide about the choice of his closest collaborators thanks to the right to propose candidates to take such positions. The length of the term in office is also different in different parties, although the most common period is 4 years (31 parties). In 63 out of 71 parties the leader is chosen by the delegates of local structures during a national congress. As regards the proposed research hypothesis, non-parliamentary parties do not significantly differ from the mainstream parties. There are no considerable disproportions with reference to the applied terminology, selecting various bodies, solutions concerning terms of office, automatic election to the most important decision-making bodies, as well as methods of selecting the leaders. The only difference concerns the fact that in non-parliamentary parties the leader is often not set apart against other party bodies, which is a situation quite rare among the main political parties. As far as the distinguished indexes are concerned, there is of course some degree of variation, yet both parliamentary as well as non-parliamentary parties show similar tendencies in formal positioning of the leaders in their structures.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The Political Leadership Section of the Polish Political Science Association: Origins and Activity

100%
Hartliński M.
Polish Political Science Yearbook
|
2016
|
vol. 45
399–403
EN
One of the most important aspects of academic life is cooperation between researchers from different centres. Different levels of experience, approaches and paradigms enable researchers to observe the complete image of categories. The Political Leadership Section of the Polish Political Science Association has been formed during the Second Nationwide Congress of Political Science in Poznań (2012). The Association’s Board has established it on February 7, 2013. Since that day the section integrates scholars from different universities interested in issues of political leadership, it supports development of this research field in Poland, it collects published monographs, editions and papers relevant to this field and it coordinates development of teaching standards in education on political leadership. The section’s activity and its role in Polish academic community proves that this topic has become a significant aspect of social sciences in the country.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Zagadnienia badawcze w analizach przywódców politycznych na przykładzie wybranych publikacji politologicznych w Polsce

100%
Hartliński M.
Kwartalnik Naukowy OAP UW "e-Politikon"
|
2014
|
issue 10
125-144
PL
Przywództwo polityczne uwarunkowane jest tradycją demokratyczną, krzyżu-jącymi się interesami różnych grup społecznych czy wyznaczaniem standardów przez media. W dobie „fabrykowanych wizerunków” coraz większą rolę od-grywa dopasowanie stylu kierowania państwem do potrzeb wyborców. Badania przeprowadzone na grupie liderów biznesu wskazują, że największą sku-teczność odnoszą liderzy o rozbudowanej inteligencji emocjonalnej (IE). Artykuł przedstawia adaptację teorii przywództwa, opracowanej w kontekście biznesu w odniesieniu do polityki. Międzykulturowe badania empiryczne (Polska, Szwajcaria, Gruzja) pokazują, że jakkolwiek mogą istnieć różnice wzorów per-cepcji i preferencji stylów przewodzenia, to w polityce –podobnie jak w bizne-sie – najmniejsze poparcie zyskują liderzy o stylu nakazowym, a największe – liderzy jednoczący, demokratyczni, wychowawczy czy autorytatywni. Rozpo-znanie roli IE i oczekiwań wyborców może m.in. pomóc w rozwoju kompetencji przywódców i ich właściwym pozycjonowaniu w kampaniach.
XX
Political leadership depends on democratic tradition, crossed interests of dif-ferent social groups or media influence. In the “age of manufactured images”, response to voters’ needs remains crucial. According to business theories of leadership, the most effective leaders are these who master emotional intelli-gence (EI) abilities. The paper tries to adapt business leadership theory to poli-tics. Cross-cultural studies conducted in Poland, Switzerland and Georgia show that, however profiles of perception and preferences of leadership styles might differ within the level of democracy maturity, in politics -as well as in business- coercive leaders gain the lowest support contrary to strongly sup-ported democratic, affiliative, coaching or authoritative leaders. Understand-ing of EI role and voters’ needs might be helpful in developing leaders’ skills and their proper positioning in political campaigns.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Stanowiska i deklaracje przywódców partii politycznych w Polsce wobec religii

63%
Hartliński M., Klepański J.
Nurt SVD
|
2017
|
issue 2
303-321
PL
Celem opracowania jest analiza porównawcza wypowiedzi sejmowych, wygłoszonych przez przywódców partii politycznych w Polsce odnośnie do religii. Zakres merytoryczny obejmuje cztery główne partie polityczne (PiS, PO, PSL, SLD) oraz ich 15 przywódców, wypowiadających się w Sejmie RP w latach 1991-2015. Należy stwierdzić, że problematyka szeroko rozumianej religii jest rzadko poruszana przez przywódców partii, na co wskazują 62 wypowiedzi spośród 3795. W ujęciu liczbowym o kwestiach związanych z religią częściej niż przywódcy PiS (8 odniesień) i PO (6) wypowiadali się liderzy SLD (28) oraz PSL (20). Przywódcami, którzy najczęściej odnosili się do aspektów religijnych, byli J. Oleksy (13 wystąpień – 5,8% ogółu jego wypowiedzi) oraz L. Miller (11 – 2,6%). Brak odwoływania się do kwestii religii dotyczy pięciu przywódców partyjnych: L. Kaczyńskiego, M. Płażyńskiego, R. Bartoszcze, J. Wojciechowskiego, K. Janika. Analiza jakościowa pokazała, że przywódcy partii odnosili się zasadniczo pozytywnie bądź neutralnie do kwestii związanych z religią. Pozytywny stosunek przejawiali głównie przywódcy PiS, PO oraz PSL. Natomiast neutralny, nie zaś negatywny (zwalczający) stosunek werbalny cechował przywódców SLD.
EN
This is a comparative study of the parliamentary utterances delivered by fifteen different leaders of the four main political parties in Poland (PiS, PO, PSL, SLD) on matters relating to religion in the years 1991-2015. Religion as such rarely made it into their sphere of interest, judging from the frequency of their remarks on it (62 out of total 3,795). Most instances belong to the politicians from SLD and PSL (28 and 20 times respectively). Leaders of PiS and PO mentioned religion 8 and 6 times respectively. Among leaders most often touching on aspects relating to religion were J. Oleksy (13 times, amounting to 5,8% of his parliamentary utterances) and L. Miller (11 times, that is, 2,6 of his total utterances). Five leaders, namely L. Kaczyński, M. Płażyński, R. Bartoszcze, J. Wojciechowski and K. Janik did not mention religion at all. Analysis of the remarks on religion by political leaders indicates their generally positive or neutral attitude to religious issues. The positive utterances would come mostly from the leaders of PiS, PO and PSL. Leaders of SLD would rather express their neutral attitude, and not a negative, or hostile one.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wstęp

63%
Hartliński M.
Forum Politologiczne
|
2013
|
vol. 15 - Przywództwo polityczne w Polsce i na świecie
13-20
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.