Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Freiheit durch Gott retten? Die Freiheitsproblematik in Schellings Schrift Über das Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit und in den Werken von Wolfhart Pannenberg

100%
Machoń H.
Diametros
|
2009
|
issue 20
62-76
PL
Artykuł jest próbą analizy istoty i granic ludzkiej wolności w horyzoncie pytania o Boga. Tak różni autorzy jak Schelling i Pannenberg, których wybrane pisma są przedmiotem niniejszych rozważań, nie rozumieją ludzkiej wolności i Boga antynomicznie, jak często ma to miejsce od czasów krytyki religii XIX i XX wieku, lecz za podstawę tejże wolności uznają Boga, który jest jej gwarantem i źródłem. Ważnym przyczynkiem do namysłu nad problematyką ludzkiej wolności w kontekście pytania o Boga stają się tu takie kwestie, jak idea Boga, rzeczywistość pojmowana jako system lub proces, znajomość uczucia wolności, czy też istota wolności rozumiana jako wolność wyboru między dobrem a złem oraz subiektywność i osobowa natura człowieka.
EN
The article is an attempt to analyze the essence and limits of human freedom within the horizon of the question about God. Such diverse authors as Schelling and Pannenberg, selections of whose writings are the subject of the present considerations, do not take human freedom and God to be contradictory, as often has been the case since the times of the critique of religion in the 19th and 20th centuries; rather, they consider God to be the foundation of freedom, being its source and guarantee. Important reasons for engaging in reflection upon the problematic of human freedom in the context of the question about God are such issues as the idea of God, reality conceived as a system or process, acquaintance with the feeling of freedom, the essence of freedom understood as freedom of choice between good and evil and subjectivity, and the personal nature of man.
2

Prymat emocji w religii? Williama Jamesa ujęcie doświadczenia religijnego

100%
Machoń H.
Lectiones & Acroases Philosophicae
|
2011
|
vol. 4
|
issue 2
115-136
EN
In his fundamental book, The Varieties of Religious Experience (1902), which enjoyed considerable attention among philosophers, psychologists, as well as religious studies specialists, William James, in the title itself, indicates his perception of the phenomenon of religious experience as extremely diverse. However, carrying distinctive elements of pragmatism and also James's theory of emotion (called James-Lange theory), the religious experience is here understood primarily as a strongly emotional phenomenon. Although James did not acknowledge the existence of specifically religious emotions, he considered emotions to be the most essential/ significant within the religious experience. The purpose of this paper is to present James’s concept of religious experience from the perspective of such characteristics as privacy, directness/immediacy or nobleness. An attempt undertaken here is to look at the essence of religion in the form of a religious experience through the reference to James's original theory of experience.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Gott als fruchtbare illusion? Ernst Blochs „Atheismus im Christentum“

100%
Machoń H.
Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris
|
2014
|
vol. 26
|
issue 3
1-14
EN
Either almighty God or a free man: this is an alternative of atheistic critique of religion. In this context, the aim of the article is to present Ernst Bloch’s (1885–1977) original proposal, concluded in his Atheism in Christianity. Standing for atheistic humanism he finds an inspiration in the Bible, in the classical example of Job’s (undeserved) suffering. Bloch’s original and appealing concept of Marxist revolution is based on hope and the idea of liberation, which are very characteristic of him. This article focuses on such issues of philosophy of religion as the biblical concept of God, the proposal of Job’s radical dilemma of righteous man’s suffering or the significance of eschatology for understanding immutability of God in His essence, who acts in mutable history.
4
Content available remote

Tertium non datur? Der Streit zwischen Idealismus und Dogmatismus in Fichtes Versuch einer neuen Darstellung der Wissenschaftslehre

100%
Machoń H.
Forum Philosophicum
|
2008
|
vol. 13
|
issue 2
283-294
DE
Der Beitrag präsentiert wesentliche Bestandteile von Fichtes Wissenschaftslehre mit einigen kritischen Bemerkungen. Als repräsentatives Beispiel seiner philosophischen Position, die zugleich die Grundlage seines wissenschaftlichen Systems bildet, stellt Fichte den Streit zwischen zwei möglichen philosophischen Systeme dar: dem Idealismus und dem Dogmatismus. In Auseinandersetzung mit dem Dogmatismus findet er die Begründung für die idealistische Position durch die Analyse von Begriffen und Phänomenen wie Erfahrung, Bewusstsein, Erkenntnis und schließlich Freiheit. Die Freiheit, verstanden als eine bewusste Entscheidung, nötigt den Philosophen zur Wahl einer konkreten Form von Philosophie, weil sie davon abhängt, was für ein Mensch man ist.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.