Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Instytucja pytań prejudycjalnych do Trybunału Sprawiedliwości w praktyce Sądu Najwyższego RP

100%
Miąsik D.
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny
|
2020
|
vol. 82
|
issue 1
5-24
EN
The article discusses the experience of the Polish Supreme Court with 31 preliminary references to the Court of Justice. It presents the subject-matter of the references, the circumstances which had been taken into account before the reference was made or before the motion to refer was rejected (by use of acte clair or acte éclairé). It provides practical guidance as to when and how to refer, and how to reason the reference. The article also analyses the impact of a preliminary ruling on the judicial decision and reasoning following the judgement of the Court of Justice, by elaborating on how the Supreme Court adjudicated after the referral.
PL
Artykuł w sposób kompleksowy i syntetyczny analizuje instytucję pytań prejudycjalnych do Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z perspektywy Sądu Najwyższego RP jako sądu unijnego. Przedstawia okoliczności wpływające na wykonywanie przez SN obowiązku kierowania pytań do TS z punktu widzenia krajowego orzecznictwa ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem zastosowania doktryn acte eclaire i acte clair. Uwzględnienia specyfikę różnych postępowań toczących się przed SN oraz różnych źródeł prawa unijnego. Prezentuje cele zadawanych pytań, przedmiot, sposób formułowania i uzasadniania. Odrębny fragment poświęcono wykonywaniu wyroków TS wydanych w odpowiedzi na pytania prejudycjalne SN z punktu widzenia zasad stosowania prawa unijnego przez sądy krajowe (prounijna wykładnia, bezpośredni skutek oraz pierwszeństwo).
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Solvents to the Rescue – a Historical Outline of the Impact of EU Law on the Application of Polish Competition Law by Polish Courts

100%
Miąsik D.
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
|
2010
|
vol. 3(3)
11-27
EN
The article is devoted to the influence of European competition law on the application of Polish competition rules by Polish courts. It covers references to EU law that has been made throughout 20 years of its history. It aims at identifying various instances where EU law has been invoked to provide Polish competition rules with the actual content as well as different modes of referrals to EU law.
FR
L’article concerne l’influence de la loi européenne de la concurrence sur l’application des règles polonaises de concurrence par des tribunaux polonais. L’article couvre les références a la loi de l’UE développée au cours des 20 années de son histoire. Son but est d’identifier des instances où la loi de l’EU a été invoquée pour donner aux règles polonaises de la concurrence le contenu actuel et les modes de référence a la loi de l’UE.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów a prawo własności intelektualnej – czy art. 2 ustawy jest w ogóle potrzebny?

100%
Miąsik D.
internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny
|
2012
|
vol. 1
|
issue 1
50-59
PL
Artykuł poświęcony jest analizie przepisu art. 2 ustawy o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów, który normuje stosunek tej ustawy do prawa własności intelektualnej. Autor prezentuje ewolucję regulacji normatywnej tego zagadnienia w polskim prawie antymonopolowym oraz zgłaszane w doktrynie propozycje interpretacji tego przepisu oraz przedstawia własną koncepcję znaczenia art. 2 ustawy. Opracowanie zawiera również ocenę potrzeby utrzymania dotychczasowego rozwiązania normatywnego. Konkluzje publikacji zawierają sugestię rezygnacji z normatywnej regulacji stosunku prawa ochrony konkurencji do prawa własności intelektualnej i propozycję uchylenia art. 2 ustawy.
EN
The article analyses Article 2 of the Polish Act on Competition and Consumer Protection 2007 as it regulates the intersection between Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and antitrust in Poland. Discussed here is the evolution of national legislation dealing with this issue as well as the approach to it presented by different commentators. The author presents also his own interpretation of Article 2 critically evaluating its content and considering the necessity of its very existence. It is ultimately concluded that there is no need for a normative regulation of the IPR/antitrust interface in the Polish Competition Act 2007 and that it is appropriate to repeal its current Article 2.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Controlled Chaos with Consumer Welfare as the Winner – a Study of the Goals of Polish Antitrust Law

100%
Miąsik D.
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
|
2008
|
vol. 1(1)
33-57
EN
This article presents the main issues relating to the goals of modern Polish competition law. It examines the relationship between the subject-matter of competition law, its function and its goals. It identifies various goals of competition law as well as their acceptance in the legal doctrine and jurisprudence. The study shows that the goals of Polish competition law have always been limited to enhancing efficiency and consumer welfare, with this latter term being understood in a post-Chicago-school fashions, rather than accordingly to its Chicago-school origin. This article shows how an 18-years competition law system, rather accidentally than deliberately, took the best ideas from both the American and the European legal tradition and mix them up into an incoherent, yet workable system of competition protection which is favourable towards efficient operations and, at the same time, safeguards consumers against exploitation and diminished choice.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The Application of EU Law by Polish Courts. General Remarks on 15 Years of Experience

51%
Domańska M., Miąsik D., Szwarc M.
Contemporary Central and East European Law
|
2019
|
issue 1 (133)
21-32
EN
The Court of Justice of the European Union operates on a case-by-case basis. This means that its decisions normally relate to specific problems occurring in a specific Member State. Consequently it is often hard to ‘translate’ this case law into the national legal system of a different Member State. Nevertheless the case law of the Court of Justice has consequences not only for the individual Member States. It also has harmonising effects. In this sense, the principles of primacy and of direct effect of EU provisions, as well as the obligation to interpret domestic law in conformity with EU law, operate as the minimum requirements which the legal systems of Member States must fulfil. Poland joined the European Union in May 2004. At that time the number of Member States increased to 25. The existence of avenues of judicial protection in the EU raised a number of questions from the very beginning. Now, after 15 years of experience it is time to consider the standard of application of EU law by Polish courts.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.