Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The anti-Russian orientation was shaped in Galicia at the end of the first decade of the twentieth century. The irredentist core of the orientation was initially composed of emigrants from the Kingdom of Poland, mainly of socialist provenance; soon, however, it increased due to access by the opponents of the current political line represented by the National League. The second core of the anti-Russian segment were the adherents of transforming the dualistic Habsburg monarchy into an Austro-Polish-Hungarian triad. Following the outbreak of the war, an attempt at continuing independent political activity, made by the irredentists together with the establishment of the Polish National Organisation, finally ended with the inclusion of that structure into the Cracow Committee (22 November 1914 ). The anti-Russian orientation was never uniform. After all, it was composed of forces which tried to realise different programmes whose contents were determined by people of incompatible experiences, not merely political. In 1914 the Galician subjects of Franz Joseph as well as the emigrants from the Kingdom of Poland found themselves in the same camp. They shared a common enemy and the belief that they were acting in the interest of the Polish cause. Despite recurring conflicts, the anti-Russian orientation survived in this form until August 1915.
EN
Despite significant progress of pertinent research, the events of March 1968 continue to a large extent to be the stuff of myths. Regardless of the publication of the extensive and well-documented monograph by J. Eisler, they are still perceived from the central, Warsaw-based perspective, while knowledge about the 'provincial' March remains slight. Although researchers concur in their descriptions (albeit not always assessments) of, e.g., the mechanisms decisive for the so-called anti-Zionist campaign, have relatively well recreated the course of the student protest, and recognised the thesis about the generational character of the protests, there still remain certain domains which call for further in-depth studies of source material and the posing of new questions. They include solidarity campaigns conducted in secondary schools, the consequences of March '68 in schools of higher learning, or the verbalisation of protests in the provinces.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.