Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The text proves the importance of philosophy for the development of science, including legal science. Philosophy as a source of wisdom would serve for the politicians in passing just laws. Philosophy is now being eliminated from the education process. The result is that the lower values dominate now, such as material and biological values. They also exist as a result of political liberalism. The lack of influence of philosophy on the consciousness of individuals eliminates higher values from the influence on society as a whole.
EN
As the Author of this article demonstrates, natural law is the subject of research by many different sciences, especially by the philosophy of law. Natural law affects public aware- ness. Classification of the theories of natural law is based on the sources of this law, including the theory of variation and immutability of natural law. Grotius developed the concept of natural law and with it laid the foundations for international law. Not all saw this as being for the good, voicing opinion that natural law was of an immoral character.
EN
The author takes up the question of the freedom in the moral and sociopolitical context. She distinguishes, besides the freedom “from” and “to”, the outside freedom and the inner freedom. The first is to determine by conditions in which the man is functioning. The second has basis in human psyche. Political system, including the democracy, should guarantee the outside freedom. The sphere of the inner freedom, in which among others the morality is realizing, cannot be limited or imposed by the state and its the laws. Democracy, which the law is a product of the majority not always of conscious people, not enough protect the outside freedom, as well as is often a threat for the inner freedom.
RU
Автор поднимает вопрос свободы в нравственном и социально-политичном контексте. Кроме свободы «от» и «до» она отличает свободу вну-треннюю и внешнюю. Первая определяется условиями, в которых человек функционирует. Вторая основывается на его психике. Политический строй, в том числе демократия, должны гарантировать внешнюю свободу человека. Сфера внутренней свободы, в которой реализуется, между прочим, нравственность, не может быть ни ограничена, ни навязана государством и его законами. Демократия, чьи законы производятся большинством, не всегда сознательных людей, не гарантируют достаточным образом внешнюю свободу, и часто бывают угрозой для внутренней свободы.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wyróżnik człowieczeństwa

100%
EN
Who is a human being? What is the aspect that marks out its humanity? Are individuals in the right to recognize themselves as better than other creatures? What is the discrimination of intellectually inferior person? The considerations proposed by the author became the basis to reflect on the situation of a modern man and their attitude towards other humans that can be different.
PL
Who is a human being? What is the aspect that marks out its humanity? Are individuals in the right to recognize themselves as better than other creatures? What is the discrimination of intellectually inferior person? The considerations proposed by the author became the basis to reflect on the situati
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.