This part includes an analysis of four primary options of implementation of the right resulting from the developer agreement and which the buyers of residential premises and single family houses are entitled to: 1) through the further development project by an official receiver (Art. 425e-425h), 2) through liquidation of the property that is being developed (Art. 425i-425k), 3) through continuation of the development project by a different entrepreneur (Art. 425l-425m), 4) through continuation of the development project in an agreement (Art. 425n-425s).
Actio pauliana procedure, fully shaped in the Roman Law during the Classical period, has been deeply rooted in the legal culture of currently unifying Continental Europe. This also applies to Poland where this procedure is very popular in a doctrinal area, often revealing major differences of views, which refers especially to functioning of actio pauliana procedure within the bankruptcy law. In this publication I present these issues, the most important ones, trying to explain/solve them.
This abstract concerns the analysis of legal consequences of initiating restructuring proceedings against a developer, specifically the definitione of the legal position of buyers of residential premises and single family houses covered by the developer agreement.
This analysis includes: 1) a brief description of general terms a) civil law claims and b) a unilateral modification right, 2) an indication of primary sources of claims for transfer of ownership, 3) a presentation of an agreed way of satisfying these claims.
The article presents: a) the merit of the right of transmission easement as a civil law institution regulated by the provisions of Article 3051 . 3054 of the Civil Code b) limitation of the ownership right or of perpetual usufruct of ownership, as a form of expropriation of a real property, regulated by public law provisions, including the Real Property Management Act, c) special claims pursuant to the provision of Article 231 § 2 of the Civil Code (failure to comply with limitation period)
This analysis presents legally substantive and formal prerequisites of a) creating a foundation, non-public school of higher education and commercial partnership, b) obtaining legal personality by foundations and schools of high er education and obtaining legal capacity by partnerships. However, first and foremost, this analysis presents some particular problems related to the transfer of ownership right or perpetual usufruct right to the property to the abovementioned entities by their creators; this is about whether the said transactions are both binding and dispositive or only dispositive. Moreover, it includes the explanation concerning the role of a notary performing the transfer of ownership or perpetual usufruct right to the property.
This article preliminarily introduces a term .handover. in the context of semantics/a dictionary, and then presents its different meanings in the legal language (i.e. the language of normative acts). Numerous cases of .handover. of a real property as a basic legal interest are discussed throughout the article.
This article discusses/analyses some of the topics connected with the issue of the fraudulent conveyance claim, especially concerning bankruptcy, which, as we all know, was not created as a legal existence by Roman law. The said legal institution has survived until now basically in an unchanged shape and nowadays is experiencing a revival, which is confirmed by many statements of the representatives of law studies, especially by the decisions of European judicial authorities.
New regulations introduced into the Polish Civil Code provide that the warranty for sales for the entrepreneur is shaped in a manner characteristic for the consumer. In this situation regulation on consumers protection apply to the physical person who performs economic activity unless the contract on sales is devoid of professional character for this person. The article considers consequences of this new regulations and highlights a few inconsistencies resulting in its application.
The main topic of this article is the term “gross ingratitude” as a condition for revoking donation of property (Art. 898 Section 1 of the Civil Code). This term is closely related to the following issues, discussed one after the other: a) obligations and dispositions/material consequences of revocation of donation b) manners of completing obligations to return transfer of ownership of the item of the donation that was revoked c) qualifications of a benefactor as a part of the term “moral rights and claims” as defined in Art. 16 of The Act on Land and Mortgage Registers and on Mortgage Finally, this article presents the abovementioned issues with respect to the provisions governing bankruptcy proceedings started against the benefactor as “a consumer”.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.