Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

VÝKON MEDZINÁRODNÉHO ROZHODCOVSKÉHO ROZSUDKU V HOLANDSKU – YUKOS CAPITAL VS. OAO ROSNEFT (PRAKTICKÝ PRÍKLAD) II. ČASŤ

100%
Chovancová K.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2012
|
vol. 95
|
issue 5
446 – 467
EN
The main obligation of every arbitrator, deciding the case in international commercial arbitration, has always been to decide the dispute in such manner, that it would mean a successful outcome of arbitration. Nowadays it is possible to state that courts, competent to permit an enforcement of foreign arbitral award are applying a positive approach, at least in the states with the international commercial arbitration being a usual way of solving international commercial disputes. Among states, in which the recognition and enforcement of the foreign arbitral award is refused only exceptionally, firmly stands undoubtedly the Netherlands. And it is the analysis of the complex case Yukos v Rosneft, decided in the Netherlands, to which the two-part-long study submitted has been utterly dedicated. The first part of the study will introduce an international commercial arbitration in the Netherlands for the reader, together with the characteristics of the most famous Dutch arbitration institution. The analysis of the Yukos v Rosneft case has been included in the second part of the study. Actually, the Dutch judgments, gradually rendered in all instances of the Dutch judicial system have proved to be an illustrative example of interpretation of the New York Convention, as well as an example of application of the Dutch Act on Arbitration 1986. Far from exaggerating any point, after delving into the intricacies of the Yukos v Rosneft case, it is possible only to predict, that nothing could have been able to diverge the reader’s attention from the fact that these judicial decisions are definitely both complicated and highly controversial in their very nature.
2

VÝKON MEDZINÁRODNÉHO ROZHODCOVSKÉHO ROZSUDKU V HOLANDSKU – YUKOS CAPITAL VS OAO ROSNEFT (PRAKTICKÝ PRÍKLAD) I. ČASŤ

100%
Chovancová K.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2012
|
vol. 95
|
issue 4
341 – 362
EN
The main obligation of every arbitrator, deciding the case in international commercial arbitration, has always been to decide the dispute in such manner, that it would mean a successful outcome of arbitration. This successful outcome is bound to have a form of the valid international arbitral award, which is easily recognizable and enforceable in any assumed state of its enforcement. Nowadays it is possible to state that courts, competent to permit an enforcement of foreign arbitral award are applying a positive approach, at least in states with the international commercial arbitration being a usual way of solving international commercial disputes. Among states, in which the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral award is refused only exceptionally, firmly stands undoubtedly the Netherlands. And it is the analysis of the complex case Yukos vs Rosneft, decided in the Netherlands, to which the two-part-long study submitted has been utterly dedicated. The first part of the study will introduce an international commercial arbitration in the Netherlands for the reader, together with characteristics of the most famous Dutch arbitration institution. The analysis of the Yukos vs Rosneft case has been included in the second part of the study. Actually, the Dutch judgments, gradually rendered in all instances of the Dutch judicial system have proved to be an illustrative example of interpretation of the New York Convention, as well as an example of application of the Dutch Act on Arbitration 1986. Far from exaggerating any point, after delving into the intricacies of the Yukos vs Rosneft case, it is possible only to predict, that nothing could have been able to diverge the reader’s attention from the fact that these judicial decisions are definitely both complicated and highly controversial in their very nature.
3

NOVÉ ROZHODCOVSKÉ PRAVIDLÁ MEDZINÁRODNÉHO ARBITRÁŽNEHO SÚDU V PARÍŽI (PROBLÉMY SÚČASNEJ APLIKAČNEJ PRAXE)

100%
Chovancová K.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2015
|
vol. 98
|
issue 3
220 – 237
EN
The International Arbitration Court in Paris (“the ICC Court“) is nowadays the leading arbitration institution in Europe. Its new arbitration rules have entered into effect on the 1st of January 2012 („the ICC Rules“), being an undisputed improvement of its predecessor from 1998. Up to now, there have not been noted any critical voices in international arbitration writings, which would concern the application of the new ICC Rules. Indeed, it appears flawless, except for one complication, caused by ignorance of the strengthened position of the ICC Court in relation to the ICC arbitration’s organization. The trouble is, that authors of the new ICC Rules really enacted an absolute exclusivity of the ICC Court for all ICC arbitrations. The latest dispute in HKL v. Rizq International has then set alive again the European – Asian polemic about the rightness of hybrid arbitrations. In the aforementioned case, the Singaporean judges decided in 2013 in favour of hybrids, supporting the international arbitration practice in Singapore. The soundness of their decisions is questionable. Be that as it may, the reasons of their issuing may be deduced by the gradual analysis of the most resonating hybrid ICC arbitrations under the SIAC insatiable roof – and this is exactly a well-hidden topic of the following study.
4

NOVÉ ROZHODCOVSKÉ PRAVIDLÁ MEDZINÁRODNÉHO ARBITRÁŽNEHO SÚDU ICC (VÝHODY A ŠPECIFIKÁ)

100%
Chovancová K.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2015
|
vol. 98
|
issue 2
105 – 127
EN
Nowadays, the International Arbitration Court in Paris (“the ICC Court“) is the leading arbitration institution, deciding international commercial disputes worldwide. The new ICC Arbitration Rules have entered into effect on the 1st of January 2012 („the ICC Rules“) and they are deemed to be an undisputed improvement of its older version from 1998. The new ICC Rules guarantee a quicker deciding of complex international disputes and reflect flexibly on the requirements of disputing parties in the ICC arbitration, as well as on the requests of the arbitration community. On the whole, the legislative changes in the ICC Rules may be divided into three categories. The first category consists of adaptations, focused on acceleration of the proceedings. The second category comprises new provisions, added to the rules in order to achieve a better reflection on the requests of both disputing parties and arbitrators in the contemporary ICC arbitration. All the new provisions with their main purpose, being an increase of the use of ICC Rules in the international investment arbitration, have been included in the third category of the latest amendments. These days – after two years since their adoption, the new ICC Rules are considered an important step forward, which is true, at least from the viewpoint of improving the effectiveness of the ICC arbitration. On the other hand, they are neither shorter, nor simpler, than their older version from 1998. As a result, their detailed analysis would have to be so detailed, that even a sensitive reader could get lost in it quite easily. On the contrary, a sketchy overview of the ICC Rules could turn out as insufficient and rushed. Because of this reason, a monitoring overview of the whole skeleton of rules seems to be a more suitable choice, while reviewing the latest amendments of the ICC Rules. And it is exactly the aforementioned monitoring ‘clean-cut’ through the most important changes in the ICC Rules in all above featured categories, that the following paper is aiming at, together with explaining their purpose and meaning for the international arbitration community.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Lucia Ráčková, François Schmitt, Les interférences linguistiques du français sur le slovaque. Lʼexemple du système verbal

100%
Chovancová K.
Studia Romanica Posnaniensia
|
2022
|
vol. 49
|
issue 2
119-123
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Injekčný užívateľ drog v centre pozornosti výskumu

63%
Chovancová K., Pavelová Ľ.
Humanum. Międzynarodowe Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne
|
2012
|
issue 2(9)
33-50
EN
Authors deal with the risk behaviour of injecting drug users in the focus of research. They described of knowledges of researches from Slovakia and strand. They defined Health Belief Model and their used in research
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.