Search results

1

Więcej niewiadomych wytrzymać w dziejach myślenia. Dialogi Junga i Heideggera z Nietzschem

100%

Kostyszak M., Instytut Filozofii U. W.

Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica – Aesthetica – Practica

|

2007

|

vol. 19-20

EN

The article, being a part of the just prepared book, deals with two different interpretations of Nietzschean text. C. G. Jung devoted five years' Seminar to discuss "Thus spoke Zarathustra" in the Psychological Club (1934–39), M. Heidegger was giving lectures and developing his controversy (Auseinandersetzung) with Nietzsche between 1934–48, some pauses including. The thesis exposed in the article suggests that in Nietzsche's text they were looking for the kind of language, capable to generate transformation of individual and general culture of being. The quest for such a regenerative code is explored in three main semantic fields: the "natural", the sacred and the artistic. The task of regaining "natural" character of human unity, despite of theoretical inadequacy of the category of "nature"; the aim of taking care of alive essence of sacrum as well as the possibilities of regeneration that may be found in the sphere of artistic experience, are considered in the light of Jungian and Heideggerian perspectives of reading Nietzsche. Ambivalence of their interpretations helps to show also certain continuous difficulties to get access to the sources of life. To endure these, at first unknown, conditions of our lives, allows the mind to learn and shape thinking from experience. Jung's and Heidegger's dialogues with Nietzsche may let us see that enduring in the unknown does not have to paralyze the growth of thinking.

2

O wielości metod w filozofii Wolffa

100%

Paź B., Instytut Filozofii U. W.

Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica – Aesthetica – Practica

|

2012

|

vol. 25

EN

The main goal of the article is to demonstrate that (against general opinion) Wolff used not one but few different research methods in his philosophy. Except mathematical (more geometrico), there were semiotic, eidetic and reflective ones. Moreover I indicate the presence of reductive, transcendental, and rhetorical method elements in Wolff's works. Each of this methods are represented in this article in details with an examples of their usage by Wolff. The choice of the methods and the structural relation between them are not coincidental. In the current article I try to prove that the heuristic epistemological primacy in Wolff's philosophy belongs not to the mathematical but to eidetic method. Speaking of the relation type between eidetic method and the rest of them – semiotic, reflective and axiomatic (mathematical one) – I would define it as: (1) genetic dependence, since eidetic method is the reason of existence of the rest of the methods, (2) heuretic dependence, while eidetic one gives the opportunity for the reflection over the rest of the methods, and (3) epistemological dependence, while eidetic method provides criteria of truth (reliability) of the knowledge for the rest of methods.

3

Mądry od początku: w stronę autobiografii Nietzschego

100%

Korobczak P., Instytut Filozofii U. W.

Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica – Aesthetica – Practica

|

2007

|

vol. 19-20

EN

In my article I try to reconstruct what one could call "Nietzsche’s epistemology". I try to show its mythological and metaphorical aspects in affiliation with an autobiographical modus of thinking by which I understand such a way of reflection that places itself in an area of individuality (contrary to generality of a concept). So, on the basis of "Ecce homo" I try to understand Nietzsche's understanding of the phenomenon of being a reader, of beginning, of wisdom. I try to investigate the role of the category of "race" in Nietzsche's thought. How does it affiliate with a conception of the differance? What are its connections with the category of language and (if so) with the writing, too? The conclusion of my article – if there is any – shows a kind of necessity and – at the same time – impossibility of being a reader of Nietzsche's writings which means: being Nietzsche's own autobiographer.

4

Zagadnienie tworzenia w filozofii Fryderyka Nietzschego

100%

Wroński J., Instytut Filozofii U. W.

Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica – Aesthetica – Practica

|

2007

|

vol. 19-20

DE

In vorliegender Arbeit wird von mir die Gedanke von Nietzsche als Philosophie aufgezeigt, deren die oberste Wert und Wesen unbedingte und hinausgehende über die Rahmen des anwesendes Daseins die Schaffung ist. Meine Arbeit fange ich damit an, die Tiefe und Ausdehnung dieser Problematik im Werk "Also sprach Zarathustra" darzustellen. Dann überlege ich die Schwierigkeiten, die vor der konstitutiven für Erfahrung des Wesens von der Schaffung stehen, die Schwierigkeiten, die vor allem aus den Begrenzungen von der Natur der Sprache und des Bewußtseins als die Vorstellung folgen. In Bezug auf die Auslegungen von Deleuze und Heidegger zeige ich weiter die Problematik der Schaffung in der Perspektive des Werdens und des Ereignisses, die eng mit der ahistorisch verstandenen Frage der Zeit zusammengehängt wird. Sehr wichtige Rolle spielt hier das Begriff der Zukunft, das der gesehenen im Gedächtnis und in der vergangenheit Grundlage der Zeit entgegengesetzt wird. Die Zukunft als schöpferischer und zugleich destruktiver Abgrund drückt hier eigene Sphäre von der Konstituierung der Zeit aus. Gemaß dahinter wird diesen Artikel mit den berlegungen geschlossen, die der Möglichkeit mystischen Auslegungen der Gedanken von Nietzsche im Zusammenhang mit der Frage der Schaffung betreffen.

Refine search results

4 Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica – Aesthetica – Practica

4 Instytut Filozofii U. W.

1 Korobczak P.

1 Kostyszak M.

1 Paź B.

1 Wroński J.

1 2012

3 2007

Więcej niewiadomych wytrzymać w dziejach myślenia. Dialogi Junga i Heideggera z Nietzschem

O wielości metod w filozofii Wolffa

Mądry od początku: w stronę autobiografii Nietzschego

Zagadnienie tworzenia w filozofii Fryderyka Nietzschego