Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Following subjects are addressed: (a) two kinds of discussion about the interpersonal; (b) criticism regarding insights into and views of the interpersonal; (c) sociological mythos and its critique; (d) critique of sociological theory; (e) differences and similarities between the sociological mythos and sociological theory.
EN
Performing the profession of scientist consists generally in creation, determination, and application of specific 'cognitive values'. It is activity of people taking part in a micro-world, in which of great importance are the rules of communicating since what is most important in science belongs to objective knowledge about the world and about research into it. Therefore, scientists' collective care about forms of their responsibility for statements promoted and accepted is of utmost importance. The culture of creation and application of scientific knowledge is a literal culture. The 'World 3' (interpreted and modified by respective invention of the 'World 2') is a treasury of knowledge objectified by its record. Therefore, the language of scientific communication and ability to decode it are of such a great importance.
EN
The paper deals with such professional duties of scholar: (1) Participation in dispute with respect to problem situation; (2) Expressing opinions in scholarly language; (3) Creation of theoretical knowledge; (4) Restricting itself to problems suitable for scholarly research; (5) Binding criticism with conceptualism; (6) Dealing with tradition of development and improvement of scientific myths; (7) Insight into continuity and discontinuity of problem situations.
EN
In the paper, the set of statements is presented that form a basis of Florian Znaniecki's considerations dealing with therapy of Western civilization and method of future civilization construction. Then the idea of therapy and construction of cultural reality is presented, that can be found in Znaniecki's writings. Znaniecki accounts Western civilization as a set of social problems that are to be recognized and appropriately solved for the civilization lasting in its integrity and vigour, whereas he accounts future civilization as a set of tasks, which planning and carrying out forms a complex of answers to a complex of challenges proper for contemporary social life of civilized societies in a global scale - scale of universum that should form a unity in diversity, i.e. a wholeness rejecting barbarianism (which classic example is revolution of nihilism and utopias of totalitarian system of common life) and gathering what is valuable in various civilizations that are advantageous fragments of global, interpersonal world.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.