Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 8

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article constitutes an analysis of the concept of satire as a discursive practice proposed by Paul Simpson. What the author considers the main forte of Simpson's model is its definition of the nature of satire without references to the categories of “satirical intent” and the “ideology” of the satirist. The author claims that such an approach allows a new perspective on the way literary satire is perceived.
PL
Przedmiotem analizy w artykule jest relacja między parodią i satyrą. Odwołując się do, zaproponowanej przez Paula Simpsona w On the Discourse of Satire, koncepcji satyry jako praktyki dyskursywnej, autorka wskazuje na przyczyny nieporozumień interpretacyjnych wynikających z zastosowania parodii w tekście satyrycznym. Jej zdaniem parodia utrudnia identyfikację intencji satyrycznej, zwłaszcza wtedy, gdy obiektem parodii jest tekst literacki o wysokich walorach artystycznych. W niektórych przypadkach niemożliwe okazuje się jednoznaczne rozstrzygnięcie, czy parodiowany tekst służy jedynie satyrycznemu ukazaniu pewnych aspektów rzeczywistości pozaliterackiej, czy jest również obiektem krytyki.
EN
The subject of analysis in this article is a relation between parody and satire. With reference to the concept of satire as a discursive practice proposed by Paul Simpson in his work On the Discourse of Satire, the author points out the reasons for interpretative misunderstandings caused by the application of parody in a satirical text. She claims that parody makes it difficult to identify a satirical intention, especially when the object of parody is a literary text of great significance. In certain cases it seems impossible to decide unambiguously whether a parodied text is only used to satirize some aspects of non-literary reality or is also a satirical target itself.
EN
The subject of analysis in the article is a relation between irony and satire understood as discursive practice. Putting under scrutiny the concept of the satirical text proposed by Paul Simpson in his work On the Discourse of Satire, the author argues that irony understood as a form of expression is not a constructive element of satire.
EN
The articles analyzes the poetics in Sylwia Chutnik’s Cwaniary. It is the audacious parody of urban courtyard ballad about four Warsaw feminist scallywags (Polish: 'cwaniary') who fist-fight to take control in the city. The author of the article demonstrates thatWarsaw is not merely the novel’s background scenery but also its main character. By analyzing the poetics of the city in the context of Chutnik’s metatextual remarks and her city guide Warszawa Kobiet (Women’s Warsaw) the author concentrates on the function of description to evoke the Warsaw genius loci. It is in the descriptive parts of the book that the writer particularly demonstrates her fascination with the city, which she herself calls ‘sickness’. This picture of Warsaw results from Chutnik’s social activism and from the attempts to ‘tame’ the place whose traumatic past leaves traces in her literary works.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Czy satyra jest formą komizmu?

100%
EN
The article undertakes the issue of relation between the comic and satire. Reviewing the recently reprinted book 'O komizmie. Od Arystotelesa do dzisiaj' by Bohdan Dziemidok, the author applies critical analysis to the researcher's proposed understanding of satire as a form of the comic which is equivalent and simultaneously opposite to humour.
6
100%
EN
The paper discusses the book by Tomasz Mizerkiewicz devoted to the phenomenon of humour in the Polish literature of the 20th and 21st centuries. Evaluating highly historical-literary merits of the work, the author draws attention to the need of a more precise defining the relation between humour, satire, comicality and grotesque. She also points to Mizerkiewicz marginalizing the satire resulting from understanding it in an exceedingly narrow sense.
EN
The problem of low interest of Polish literary scholars in the satire is discussed in the article. The author points to the need for a deeper reflection on this phenomenon, aimed at restoring the term “satire” as necessary neutral for effective use in the analytical-interpretative practice. Taking into account the autocratic potential of satire, the author suggests to look at it as a form of challenge to the reader, which provokes the search for a “new perspective”.
EN
In the article, the author analyses the satirical works by Julian Tuwim published in his poetic collections. By indicating the strong bonds between poetry and satire in the poet’s works, the author explains the phenomenon of the unwavering topicality of Tuwim’s satire having generalising ambitions. She has considered the poet’s masterful combination of the poetic perspective with the attitude of a satirist as a factor which enables the generalisation of the critical diagnosis. However, she argues that the universal dimension of his wide-scope satirical works is mainly determined by the poet’s worldview-based horizons, which constituted the point of reference for his critical evaluation of the existing social reality, which exposed the destructive influence of a community on an individual. She also stated that he was able to peer deep into the mentality of the mindless members of the “tyrannous community” by virtue of his distance towards himself, in turn being the result of his sense of the absurdity of his own existence.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.