Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The paper aims to define the concept of “felt sense”, introduced in psychology and psychotherapy by E. T. Gendlin, in order to clarify its relation to bodily sensations and its difference from emotions. Gendlin’s own definition, according to which the felt sense is a conceptually vague bodily feeling with implicit meaning, is too general for this task. Gendlin’s definition is specified by pointing out, first, the different layers of awareness of bodily feelings and, second, the difference between bodily readiness for action and motivation for action. According to the more precise definition, the felt sense is the awareness of readiness to act carried by the configuration of bodily sensations. The felt sense differs from emotions because it is not able to motivate the action for which it makes us ready. The article also discusses the intuition that led to the founding of Gendlin’s psychotherapeutic technique and compares it with the psychoanalytic concept of working through resistance during therapy.
CS
Cílem článku je vymezit pojem „pociťovaný smysl“, který do psychologie a psychoterapie zavedl E. T. Gendlin, tak aby se objasnil jeho vztah k tělesným počitkům a jeho odlišnost od emocí. Gendlinova vlastní definice, podle níž je pociťovaný smysl pojmově vágním tělesným pocitem s implicitním významem, je pro tento úkol příliš obecná. Gendlinova definice je v článku upřesněna poukazem jednak na různé vrstvy vědomí tělesných pocitů, jednak na rozdíl mezi tělesnou přípravou k jednání a motivací k jednání. Podle upřesněné definice je pociťovaný smysl vědomím připravenosti k jednání nesené konfigurací tělesných počitků. Proti emocím se liší tím, že jednání, na které připravuje, není schopen sám motivovat. Článek též rozebírá intuici, která vedla Gendlina k založení vlastní psychoterapeutické techniky, a srovnává ji s psychoanalytickým pojetím propracování odporu během terapie.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2013
|
vol. 68
|
issue 5
367 – 375
EN
The paper compares the notion of bodily expression as used in Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of perception with the notion gained from the analysis of The Acting with the Inner Partner. It is a kind of dramatic improvised performance, developed at the Department of Authorial Creativity and Education at the Theatre Faculty of the Performing Arts in Prague. Whereas Merleau-Ponty grasps the experience of non-certainty, so typical for the creative state of mind, by the schema empty intention/fulfilment. The Acting with the Inner Partner is based on the ability of a body’s expression to create its own meaning. Thus the body’s expressivity is liberated from the meaning given in advance, no matter if fulfilled (as it is in the case of imitation) or just empty or intended (as when realizing an idea). The improvisation thus offers a new means how to get to the “very birth” of our experience (Merleau-Ponty’s understanding of the proper goal of phenomenology), and to understand the intrinsic creativity of our own body.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.