Results found: 1

Search results

Sort By:

Limit search:

Understanding, Expression and Unwelcome Logic

100%

Holub Š.

Studia Semiotyczne

2020

vol. 34

issue 1

In this paper I will attempt to explain why the controversy surrounding the alleged refutation of Mechanism by Gödel’s theorem is continuing even after its unanimous refutation by logicians. I will argue that the philosophical point its proponents want to establish is a necessary gap between the intended meaning and its formulation. Such a gap is the main tenet of philosophical hermeneutics. While Gödel’s theorem does not disprove Mechanism, it is nevertheless an important illustration of the hermeneutic principle. The ongoing misunderstanding is therefore based in a distinction between a metalogical illustration of a crucial feature of human understanding, and a logically precise, but wrong claim. The main reason for the confusion is the fact that in order to make the claim logically precise, it must be transformed in a way which destroys its informal value. Part of this transformation is a clear distinction between the Turing Machine as a mathematical object and a machine as a physical device.

Refine search results

1 Studia Semiotyczne

1 Holub Š.

1 2020

Search results

Understanding, Expression and Unwelcome Logic