Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 9

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
Trzy lata temu, przy okazji rozmowy o zbliżającym się wówczas XXVI Kongresie Heglowskim, który pod hasłem „Filozofia polityczna Hegla”  odbył  się  w  2006  roku  w  Poznaniu,  jeden  z  kolegów-filozofów zwrócił mi uwagę na dość osobliwą sytuację, z którą mieliśmy do czynienia po upadku tzw. realnego socjalizmu i przywróceniu niepodległości w 1989 roku. Jednym z naczelnym haseł, którymi posługiwali się wówczas politycy, politolodzy i publicyści – że wymienię choćby Pawła Śpiewaka i Jadwigę Staniszkis – było zbudowanie w naszym kraju społeczeństwa obywatelskiego i oparcie na nim nowego ładu społecznego.
EN
The present analysis and interpretation relate to Hans-Georg Gadamer’s book The Enigma of Health, a seemingly surprising choice of subject matter for this prominent thinker. In fact, there is no surprise considering how he approached and practised hermeneutic philosophy. In this concept, disease “forces itself” on us, while health “hides itself”, which related to the structure of our being in the world. A reflection on the changing historical experience of humanity requires new light to be shed on the relation between philosophy and medicine, and a particular deliberation on how the latter handles the relations between theory and practice, and between theory and technology. The outcome offered by hermeneutics, drawing on philosophy of life, is a deepened understanding of medicine with a characteristic expression of the relation between nature and culture.
PL
The text begins with an introduction that sketches the philosophical and cultural context of Being and Time which is followed by three parts. In the fi rst part theauthor explains the reasons why Heidegger’s analysis of human existence, which he calls a “hermeneutics of facticity”, developed into fundamental ontology. In the second part the author discovers an ontological description of death, as contained in this book, which is fundamentally different from any ontic description of this phenomenon. The last part contains the conclusions: 1. Heidegger’s fundamental ontology opens up a new chapter in the history of Western philosophy; it is an original project of a hermeneutic phenomenology; 2. the experience of death belongs, according to Heidegger, to the transcendental structure of a human being. Levinas’s and Sartre’s critique of Heidegger’s description of death is invalid because Heidegger does not describe bodily experience and pain, which accompany the process of dying, but rather the consciousness of being mortal that conditions people’s existential projects. This constitutes a deeper sense of his analyses.
EN
Well known is the distance of Hermeneutical Philosophy – whose fundaments, based on the findings of Heidegger and Dilthey, were created by Gadamer andRicoeur – to Kant's theoretical philosophy, i.e. to his theory of knowledge. This is surprising that in the area of practical philosophy – mainly applied to ethics, to a lesser extent to policy – a reference to the ideas of the author of Critique of the Practical Reason is definitely stronger. The effect of this is that Hermeneutical Philosophy makes an important contribution to maintaining the vitality of ethical thought of Kant,to renew and nurture its spiritual heritage. This text shows, due to an analysis of the ethical considerations of Gadamer and Ricoeur, in what wayand to what extent ethical reflection in hermeneuticsderives from this heritage.
EN
While Stein truly admired Heidegger, she was nevertheless deeplysceptical of the direction that his philosophy took. What caused such a flattering assessment of Heidegger was primarily, but not exclusively, her reading of Being and Time. In this work,Stein saw the development of the issues that fascinated her for a long time and whichwere for her more important than epistemological studies that dominated Husserl’s research.It was a matter of individual, unique, human existence. Her critical review ofHeidegger's book shows two elements that set the way for the development of a comprehensive,systematic hermeneutical philosophy. The first is the stress on the importance ofthe human community against the domination of das Man. The second component is heraccount of death, in response to Heidegger's description of being-towards-death
EN
The article presents the New Phenomenology of Hermann Schmitz as a third way of doing philosophy today: between the Scylla of analytical analysis of language and science and the Harybdis of quasi-metaphysical description of the reality (structuralism, new ontologies), being a kind of continuation of the speculative idealism. Based on the general idea of the descriptiv phenomenology by Edmund Husserl and critisizing the mistakes done by its initiator Hermann Schmitz proposes an attractive form of the philosophical research that situates itself far from summerizing the results of the scientific inquiry on one side and from critisizing the sciences from a “higher, metaphysical” standpoint on the other. In a kind of friendly challenge to the Fundamental Ontology Heidegger’s the New Phenomenelogy proposes an analysis of humans’s primordial experiences of the reality we are in, sharing it partially with animals. Schmitz seems to succeed in showing the point where the human experience transcendents the reality experience of the higher animals, which is an interesting challange to a similar attempt done by John Searle.
EN
The aim of the above text is presentation and a critical analysis of the vision of human being contained in Dilthey’s hermeneutical philosophy of life. It is well-known that Dilthey based his early epistemology of the humanities on so-called descriptive psychology that anticipated the phenomenology of Husserl. I try to show that this concept is explicitly connected with an anthropology that tries to dicover – on a basis of historical research of human culture – the universal categories describing the essence of human being as such.
EN
The article presents the New Phenomenology of Hermann Schmitz as a third way of doing philosophy today: between the Scylla of analytical analysis of language and science and the Harybdis of quasi-metaphysical description of the reality (structuralism, new ontologies), being a kind of continuation of the speculative idealism. Based on the general idea of the descriptiv phenomenology by Edmund Husserl and critisizing the mistakes done by its initiator Hermann Schmitz proposes an attractive form of the philosophical research that situates itself far from summerizing the results of the scientific inquiry on one side and from critisizing the sciences from a “higher, metaphysical” standpoint on the other. In a kind of friendly challenge to the Fundamental Ontology Heidegger’s the New Phenomenelogy proposes an analysis of humans’s primordial experiences of the reality we are in, sharing it partially with animals. Schmitz seems to succeed in showing the point where the human experience transcendents the reality experience of the higher animals, which is an interesting challange to a similar attempt done by John Searle.
EN
In both the Polish and German languages, the term ‘reparations’ is almost exclusively associated with the compensation for wartime losses incurred by a state as a result of unjustified military aggression on the part of another, ultimately defeated state. The term ‘compensation’ has the broadest scope in both languages. Therefore, this term used in the parliamentary resolution of October 2022 concerning reparations from the Federal Republic of Germany seems appropriate, as the material and non-material losses of the Polish state and its citizens in 1939, caused by the Nazi Germany, are evident and easily demonstrable.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.