Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Sytuacja materialna a wyniki kształcenia studentów wychowania fizycznego podejmujących pracę zarobkową

100%
Rekowski W., Zubrzycka A.
Rozprawy Naukowe Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego we Wrocławiu
|
2015
|
vol. 49
73-82
EN
Background. The aim of the study was to present the quantitative and qualitative description of the phenomenon of students’ gainful employment and determine if the work affects their functioning in the college. Materials and methods. The research included 412 fulltime Master’s degree students from Józef Piłsudski Uniwersity of Physical Education. The self-designed questionnaire was used and the statistical analysis was performed. Results. The majority of respondents was not employed during the course of studies. Gainfully employed students were active both in the learned profession and in other areas. The most common reasons for taking gainful employment were: improvement of the financial situation, earning money for entertainment, acquiring new skills and experience. Conclusion. The socio-demographic situation does not affect the phenomenon of taking gainful employment. The field of study affects the employment. Gainful employment does not affect student’s functioning in the college.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Tło społeczne i niektóre elementy sytuacji studiowania nieatrakcyjnych kierunków, na przykładzie studentów wychowania fizycznego

100%
Rekowski W., Jankowski K. W.
Rozprawy Naukowe Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego we Wrocławiu
|
2015
|
vol. 48
137-150
EN
Background. The aim of the study was to look at the social composition of students studying unpopular degree courses and to verify whether their social characteristics affect their studyrelated situation. The questions arose in the context of the processes occurring in higher education in Poland in recent years: increasing accessibility of higher education and elimination of horizontal access barriers. Material and methods. A group of 412 students in master’s degree programs in physical education, tourism and recreation, and physiotherapy participated in the survey. Results. The results indicate that people coming from families of lower status tend to select these degree courses more often than others. The student community encompasses people from two socio-professional backgrounds: (i) business owners and (ii) employees in the service and trade sector. Social origin affects the subjects’ studying situation. Considering the aspects of satisfaction connected with studying and accepting their later role as professionals, physical education students have the most positive image of studies. Conclusions. In the social strata from which the students come, the need for higher education is acknowledged, and the families can provide money necessary for this purpose.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Środowiskowe przyzwolenie na łamanie zasad dobrej praktyki badawczej w opinii społeczności akademickiej

81%
Rekowski W., Przyłuska-Fiszer A., Różyńska J., Fijałkowska B.
Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa
|
2012
|
vol. 48
|
issue 4 (194)
251-268
PL
Do najpoważniejszych występków względem dobrej praktyki badawczej zalicza się powszechnie: fałszerstwa, fabrykowanie oraz plagiatorstwo. Fanelli dokonał pierwszej metaanalizy badań empirycznych, w których starano się określić rozmiary zjawiska nierzetelności wśród badaczy. Okazało się, że średnio 2% naukowców przyznało się do popełnienia przynajmniej raz w karierze zawodowej fabrykacji bądź fałszerstwa, a prawie jedna trzecia do różnych innych, budzących wątpliwości praktyk badawczych. Od 14% do 72% respondentów zaobserwowało te praktyki u swych współpracowników. Zgodnie z wiedzą autorów, jak dotąd nie przeprowadzono żadnego badania dotyczącego nierzetelności badawczej w nauce wśród polskich naukowców. Celem prezentowanych badań było zbadanie z użyciem kwestionariusza opinii o środowiskowymprzyzwoleniu dla nierzetelności badawczej w dwóch środowiskach: doktorantów i pracowników naukowo-dydaktycznych uczelni wyższej Obie badane grupy wyrażają opinie o stosunkowo wysokim poziomie braku przyzwolenia na dopuszczanie się nierzetelności w trakcie procedury badań naukowych. Stwierdzono jednak istotne różnice opinii pomiędzy badanymi grupami. Grupa doktorantów o około 20% częściej wskazuje na istnienie środowiskowego przyzwolenia dla łamania norm. Pracownicy naukowi w większości (85-95%) wyrażają opinie o braku akceptacji dla nierzetelności naukowej, jednak także wśród nich daje się wyróżnić grupa wskazująca na stosunkowo wysoki poziom przyzwolenia. Uzyskane wyniki potwierdzają spostrzeżenia innych autorów o trudności mierzenia zjawiska nierzetelności w nauce i wskazują na konieczność prowadzenia dalszych badań.
EN
Fabrication, falsification and plagiarism are serious forms of scientific misconduct. D. Fanelli conducted the first meta-analysis of surveys aiming to define the level of scientific misconduct among scientists. It found that on average, about 2% of scientists admitted to have fabricated or falsified their researches at least once in their carrier, and up to one third admitted a variety of other questionable research practices. From 14% up to 72% of respondents observed such conduct among their associates. To Authors best knowledge, no one has ever conducted a study on scientific misconduct among Polish scientists. This paper details the findings of the first survey of PhD students and academic employees of one of Warsaw universities concerning the respondents’ perception of the level of acceptance for fabrication, falsification and plagiarism within the university community. In this research a questionnaire was used where respondents had to estimate the level of acceptance for scientific misconduct. Both groups of respondents express relatively a high level of non-acceptance for scientific misconduct. However, there are significant differences between the opinions of both groups. Ca 20% more PhD students then academic employees expressed the view that there is acceptance for questionable research practices. Majority of academic employees (85-95%) did not share that view, however even among themselves there exist a group that indicates that there is a high level of acceptance for scientific misconduct. Findings confirm opinions expressed by many researchers that scientific misconduct is a phenomenon hard to investigate. Academic employees’ opinions are rather declaratory than descriptive, most probably because of their strong sense of professional solidarity. Doctoral students significantly more often express the view that there is an acceptance for questionable research practices.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Ocena systemu klasyfikacji w piłce siatkowej na siedząco na podstawie opinii zawodników reprezentacji Polski

71%
Marszałek J., Molik B., Lencse-Mucha J., Abadżijew B., Rekowski W.
Rozprawy Naukowe Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego we Wrocławiu
|
2015
|
vol. 49
90-98
EN
Background. Sitting volleyball is one of the fastest growing disciplines of sport for people with movement impairments. In contrast to other team games, sitting volleyball has no division into start classes. Players are divided into those with minimum disability – MD (one player with minimum disability may be on the court) and athletes with movement impairments – D. The aim of this study was to evaluate the medical classification system in sitting volleyball based on National Polish players’ opinion. Material and methods. Nineteen people (12 men, 7 women) were examined during a sport camp (24th–27th April 2014). A diagnostic survey method was performed (10 personal questions, 16 concern classification system in sitting volleyball). Respondents were asked about their opinions on the current classification system of athletes with disabilities in sitting volleyball and possibility of playing with able-bodied athletes. Results. The current classification system has been assessed as “good” by 47.4% of respondents. Most of the athletes (73.7%) opted for a change in the medical classification system to a functional one. Most of the respondents (63.2%) were opposed to playing able-bodied with disabled athletes. Conclusion. The results confirmed the need for changes in the classification system of disabled athletes in sitting volleyball. However these changes of classification system require further verification of the scientific research.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.