Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Słuszność moralna a dzieło sztuki. Przypadek Knuta Hamsuna

100%
Schauffler D.
ER(R)GO: Teoria – Literatura – Kultura
|
2005
|
issue 11
EN
David Schauffler Moral Correctness and the Artwork. The Case of Knut Hamsun David Schauffler distinguishes five different levels on which one can consider the relation between art and politics: contextual, intentional, temporal, categorical, and finally and most importantly – ethical, a level which he regards as primary and fundamental. On the example of Knut Hamsun’s infamous pro-Nazi stance during World War II and his pro-German inclinations even long before the War, Schauffler exposes the difficulty, or rather impossibility, of reconciling a high appreciation of an author’s artistic merits with revulsion towards his or her offensive political opinions. Regardless of the numerous reasons we can adduce to explain Hamsun’s political views, among them the urge to remain untainted by commonly held beliefs, time came, argues Schauffler, when the conventional wisdom was right.
PL
David Schauffler Moral Correctness and the Artwork. The Case of Knut Hamsun David Schauffler distinguishes five different levels on which one can consider the relation between art and politics: contextual, intentional, temporal, categorical, and finally and most importantly – ethical, a level which he regards as primary and fundamental. On the example of Knut Hamsun’s infamous pro-Nazi stance during World War II and his pro-German inclinations even long before the War, Schauffler exposes the difficulty, or rather impossibility, of reconciling a high appreciation of an author’s artistic merits with revulsion towards his or her offensive political opinions. Regardless of the numerous reasons we can adduce to explain Hamsun’s political views, among them the urge to remain untainted by commonly held beliefs, time came, argues Schauffler, when the conventional wisdom was right.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Dialektyka żarłoczności, albo o pustych trzewiach nienasyconego rozumu

100%
Schauffler D.
ER(R)GO: Teoria – Literatura – Kultura
|
2002
|
issue 4
EN
David Schauffler The Dialectic of Gluttony, or The Empty Stomach of Insatiable Reason Summary The radical physiological limits imposed upon the gross human appetites is compensated for by their constant recurrence. The very meaning of an appetite seems to be necessarily connected with the ideas of repletion and repetition, the sense of a continual process of desire and its fulfillment. The immediate and repetitive satisfaction of the individual appetite is mirrored by the general socio-economic activity of the fulfillment of the stipulated needs of the public, a process which likewise contains a dialectical relationship between the (re)occurence of the appetite and its satisfaction. The socio-economic level of this dialectic has received considerable attention. The paper intends to reexamine its connection to the individual, or microappetitive, dialectic, which the Author calls the dialectic of gluttony, and thereby to further draw attention to another repetitive process, another cycle of desire and fulfillment, and that is dialectical criticism itself.
PL
David Schauffler The Dialectic of Gluttony, or The Empty Stomach of Insatiable Reason Summary The radical physiological limits imposed upon the gross human appetites is compensated for by their constant recurrence. The very meaning of an appetite seems to be necessarily connected with the ideas of repletion and repetition, the sense of a continual process of desire and its fulfillment. The immediate and repetitive satisfaction of the individual appetite is mirrored by the general socio-economic activity of the fulfillment of the stipulated needs of the public, a process which likewise contains a dialectical relationship between the (re)occurence of the appetite and its satisfaction. The socio-economic level of this dialectic has received considerable attention. The paper intends to reexamine its connection to the individual, or microappetitive, dialectic, which the Author calls the dialectic of gluttony, and thereby to further draw attention to another repetitive process, another cycle of desire and fulfillment, and that is dialectical criticism itself.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.