This article aims to establish the current practice of determining the qualifications of candidates for court experts. This is done on the example of the model developed by the District Court in Poznan on the basis of the author’s research. The study involved examination of personal files of court experts in forensics entered in the list kept by the President of the District Court in Poznan.First, the standard model for determining the qualifications of candidates for expert witnesses adopted by statute has been presented, and then the qualifications of expert witnesses from the list and the manner of their documentation by candidates examined. This is followed by an analysis of the manner in which the qualifications of candidate experts are verified by the President of the District Court in Poznan.
PL
Celem artykułu jest ustalenie modelu weryfikacji kwalifikacji kandydatów na biegłych sądowych istniejącego w praktyce. Model ten ukazano na przykładzie modelu wypracowanego w okręgu poznańskim. Artykuł przygotowano na podstawie badań własnych przeprowadzonych na obszarze Sądu Okręgowego w Poznaniu. Badaniom poddano akta osobowe biegłych sądowych z dziedziny kryminalistyki wpisanych na listę prowadzoną przez Prezesa Sądu Okręgowego w Poznaniu. Artykuł podzielono na dwie części. W pierwszej części ukazano ustawowy model weryfikacji kwalifikacji kandydatów na biegłych sądowych. W części drugiej przedstawiono kwalifikacje biegłych sądowych wpisanych na listę Sądu Okręgowego w Poznaniu oraz sposób ich dokumentowania przez kandydatów na biegłych. W części tej ukazano również wypracowany przez Prezesa Sądu Okręgowego w Poznaniu sposób weryfikacji tych kwalifikacji.
The aim of this paper is to present the possibilities and prospects for the development of modern criminalistics. Discussion of this matter is of importance due to the observa-tion that criminalistics has, of late, lost its original form. The new techniques, including forensic analysis and biometrics, for example, are applied in traditional criminalistics. Fields of knowledge such as forensic archeology and forensic entomology play a signifi-cant role in solving common crimes and are also gradually forming part of criminalistics. There are still no effective tools, however, to combat economic crime. This paper presents the research capabilities that academic research institutes have in this field and possible ways to equip the authority conducting the proceedings with algorithms for identify-ing and combating economic crime. The paper is divided into three parts. The first part demonstrates the shortcomings of criminalistics in terms of the fight against economic crime. The second part presents the author’s achievements, such as establishing the types of economic opinions and presenting typical traces of economic crime. The third part presents the possibilities for further development of criminalistics.
The article presents basic findings about the disciplinary and criminal liability of common courts judges in Poland. These findings are presented from a criminalistics perspective. The article provides data on the following issues: the basics of the disciplinary and criminal liability of judges, the number of disciplinary cases of judges in the years 2010–2018 and the number of criminal cases of judges in the years 2001–2017, categories of the disciplinary violations and crimes committed, decisions taken in cases of disciplinary violations, and imposed penalties. The article is based on an examination of Supreme Court verdicts issued in disciplinary cases of judges and data provided by the Ministry of Justice
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.