The paper is aimed at the problem of transformational word-formation meant as a dynamic process of formation of new expressions on the basis of linguistic models using entire forms of already existing expressions, which become motivated expressions that way. This problem was taken into consideration from this viewpoint often defined in linguistics as polysemy. One lexical unit was analyzed on the basis of many core glossaries and a homonym dictionary, and three was an attempt to falsify the theory of polysemy and substitute it with the theory of homonimoidality seen as a phenomenon of formal similarity of xpressions having different semantic features and retained derivational features (one of the expressions is a motivational one, another – motivated). The paper also presents a detailed description with a scheme of motivation of such lexical transformations of the entity, which is determined by a greater semantic elasticity. In the glossaries, the number of meanings for the lexical unit oscillated at 15–17 meanings but their definitions were different. The change in basic theory allowed both to distract and to order the semantic structure of homonimoids пройти.
W opracowaniu zaprezentowano analizę wybranych wyroków sądowych opublikowanych w Centralnej Bazie Orzeczeń Sądów Administracyjnych w okresie od 1 stycznia 2014 r. do 10 października 2016 r. Celem analizy było rozpoznanie przypadków, w których naliczenie opłaty planistycznej stanowiło podstawę skargi do sądu administracyjnego. Najczęściej wątpliwości wzbudzało naliczenie opłaty planistycznej w przypadku darowizny lub dziedziczenia nieruchomości, zamiany nieruchomości, nieodpłatnego przeniesienia własności nieruchomości celem zaspokojenia roszczeń pożyczkodawcy, a także nieodpłatnego przeniesienia własności nieruchomości wchodzących w skład gospodarstwa rolnego. Ponadto głównym zarzutem skarżących było naliczanie opłat planistycznych w oparciu o wadliwie sporządzony operat szacunkowy.
EN
The analysis of selected court judgments published in the Central Database of Decisions of Administrative Courts in the period from 1 January 2014 to 10 October 2016 was presented in the paper. The aim of the analysis was to recognize the range of cases in which calculation of a planning fee was the basis for the petition to the administrative court. The cases where planning fee calculation was dependent on interpretation of the term “disposal of property” were subjected to the detailed analysis. Calculating the planning fee in case of donation or inheritance of property, exchange of properties, free transfer of ownership of property to satisfy claims of a lender and also free transfer of ownership of properties included in an agricultural holding were called into question most often. Moreover, the main accusation of applicants was calculating planning fees on the basis of improperly prepared property valuation.