Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The study covers one of the key aspects of Erdei's social strata analysis, that is, the characteristics of the farm-like market towns in the Great Plains. Erdei saw the 'third way' as the only alternative for successful social development of peasantry stepping out from a closed world of community existence. The study points out that Erdei's interpretation is seen rather burdened with an ideological approach. Although the author was been known as the most outstanding scholar of market-town social development (and his work on Hungarian towns may well be considered a standard for town sociology), in certain cases Erdei's typical program action and its value orientation interwoven with his ideological approach also shape the aspects of his book, therefore his strata analysis becomes indefensible. The study also touches upon the fact that the precedents for the concept of the double structure can be observed in his earlier works already in the 1930's, although his ideas had not yet been characterized with his latter approach of double structure. In his approach, Erdei divided the examined society in two possible social strata, as the only preferable social development, and its all possible anti-poles.
EN
This study analyzes the group formation within the populist sociographers that expresses a national radical policy in contrary to the existing Christian-national trend. This political view is the base of a common platform among Ferenc Erdei, Geza Feja and Peter Veres. The paper examines the approach to society of this group that intents to draw the attention in their sociographic writings to the inherited new socialization of Hungarian farmers and intents to establish a new national radical policy based on the farmers. This analysis points out that these three writers also share - beyond the opposition policy and the emancipation program of farmers - the vision of a social progress building on the tradition of the farmer society. In addition, the study highlights that these three sociographers are common to place the inherited opportunities in the social progress of the farmers living in the Alfold. By comparing the social approaches of these writers, the author analyzes to what unfounded value statements this committed national radical policy leads in the descriptions of the society.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.